• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the nuclear family benefit the bourgoisie?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

DOES THE NUCLEAR FAMILY BENEFIT THE POWERFUL? The nuclear family can be taken to be two parents and their children. Is the nuclear family primarily to benefit the powerful rather than society as a whole can be perceived to be true. This point of view is associated with Marxism and the powerful are the ruling class or bourgeoisie. They own the means of production such as land, factories, machines and so on. Marxism is based on an exploitative and unequal relationship between two classes. The proletariats who are the workers are the majority and this is were the family comes in. The family is controlled by those who control the economy and they control the family and manipulate the family into benefiting them. In any society the economic aspect (that is, the productive process involving the creation of goods and services for distribution and exchange) is always the most basic, fundamental and ultimately most significant aspect because it is only through economic activity that people can produce the things they need for their physical survival. ...read more.

Middle

Marxists contend that this "illusion of power" within the family serves as a safety value for the build-up of tension and frustration at work. The feminist perspective on the family has tended to stress the following ideas. Men oppress women within the family, just as they oppress women within all other institutions in Capitalist society. Feminist have tended to dismiss ides of gender differences based upon supposed biological / genetic differences between males and females that serve to legitimate male domination over women. Women have a role forced upon them within the family. Women act as "unpaid servants" within the home. This idea is linked, by Marxist feminists, to the economic relationship between Capital and labour, in the sense that labour is exploited by Capital in the economic aspect just as women are exploited by men within the family. They see family benefiting the powerful who are the men, this is patriarchy. Functionalist sociology has tended to look towards the family as the cornerstone of social integration in any society by which is meant the idea that ways have to be found to make ...read more.

Conclusion

In short, it provides a sense of belonging and serves to clearly-define role relationships between men and women. Provision of a Home: This idea expresses the assumption that people find comfort and security within primary social and sexual relationships. The "home" not only provides physical shelter, it also serves as the focal point of family existence. I recognise that the family group serves some kind of purpose in any society. Where Marxists tend to disagree with thinkers working in other perspectives, however, is in relation to the nature of that purpose and, for Marxists, the relationship between the family and the social structure of any society is one of unequal dependence. Functionalists argue that social institutions develop out of the need to satisfy, fulfil and organise various human social needs. However I feel that the primary role of the family is not to benefit the powerful but in some societies it does to an extent conform to this idea. There are other functions of the family such as the socialisation of children also providing love and support for its members which does not always benefit the powerful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This essay identifies the correct theories to use and cover the basic assumption of each theory well. However, there are a distinct lack of sociologists, key terms and theory to back up the points being made.

Marked by teacher Matthew Wilkin 04/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber's view on Stratification

    they do not own part of the means of production and lack the means to produce goods autonomously. They are therefore dependent on the capitalists for their livelihood. The capitalists, as non-producers, are dependent on the labourers, since, without them, there would be no production.

  2. "Men and women have different roles to play in modern society." Discuss

    Thus the traditional gender roles remain intact. If, in any case, the traditional roles of mother and father are not fulfilled, it will have negative repercussions on a child.

  1. The City in Anthem has numerous rules and controls. Why do these exist? What ...

    The world council was shocked to see Prometheus, a man who was not one among them to come and present in front of all the scholars. The council of scholars did not like the idea of Prometheus for many different reasons like: (1) not belonging to the house scholars (2)

  2. Introduction to Sociology - questions and answers

    up on from the day we are born and in our everyday lives. Primarily we start to learn our culture through family and our households, it then furthers on to a second stage which comes from learning, whether being at school, work or socially networking.

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    reform movement hoping to change the position of the working class through a six point charter. Although there were other factors involved, one of the main reasons Chartism failed was because the Church did not support them. The church told the working class that they should accept their position in society and not try to change it.

  2. Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist perspectives on the family

    Murdock's idea of a sexual function agrees with Engels' point of monogamous nuclear families because they both agree that there should only be one sexual relationship and this is to be between the adults in the family. Functionalists and Marxists tend to focus largely on the nuclear family and ignore

  1. Is sociology a science?

    Then theories may be formulated to explain observed behaviour. Positivists criticize those sociologists who study unobservable and subjective mental states.

  2. The role of religion in society.

    Functionalists do not say that Religion doesn't change. its form certainly does. Parsons believed that religion was in differentiation, but what does not change is the function of religion in society and therefore supports the status quo. The culture of a particular political movement is parralelled with the collectivity of religious movements, ie, rituals like flag waving and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work