• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate some of the ways in which the movement from pre-industrial to industrial society has been used by sociologists to explain changes in the family.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate some of the ways in which the movement from pre-industrial to industrial society has been used by sociologists to explain changes in the family. Around 1800, a period of change began to occur. Before this period, people often lived in extended families, i.e. land and other resources would be split between numerous kin besides the conventional nuclear family unit (mother, father, children), e.g. cousins. Home and workplace were basically one and the same, with very few people going out to find work and neighbouring families trading goods with one another. Family roles in work were simply ascribed rather achieved, passed down generation to generation - with no other chance of mobility unless a family member died or moved away for some reason - and each family seemed to have a particular speciality, e.g. pig farming. These extended families all worked together for each other and cared for one another from birth to death. However, the advent of an industrial society brought an end to all that. Instead of a more pastoral existence, the emphasis shifted to factories offering work connected by goods produced through machinery and a process of urbanisation occurred. Functionalism is the theory that social events can be best explained in terms of the functions they perform, i.e. ...read more.


As well as asking whether Parsons and other sociologists had bothered to include non-family members of households in their calculations, Laslett and Wall also concluded that while the average size of households decreased, the average size of the family did not. In 1957, another pair of sociologists, named Young & Willmott, came up with a theory that also contradicted some of Parsons' ideas. They believe the change happened over a longer period of time rather than being sudden. Their research in Bethnal Green (East London) in the 1950's found that even then extended families were living together because of emotional attachment and obligation, and again, acting as a mutual support network. In 1973 Young & Willmott published a study claiming that the extended family declined in the 1960s with the advent of council housing after extensive slum clearance. Also, welfare and benefit systems introduced by the government in the 1950's lessened the need for a mutual support system. Therefore, the nuclear family only became the social norm in the latter half of the twentieth century. They also believe that the family went through three important main stages (and is possibly in a fourth right now): the first is the pre-industrial family, which they believed was revolved around primogeniture (where the eldest son inherits everything); the second is the family during the period of industrialisation, which again, ...read more.


certain duties were given to certain genders; that when asked it was found that in 81% of households, women had last cleaned the toilet; that only 42% of men found the current domestic division of labour unfair; and finally, they also considered the change in values against changes in behaviour. Edgell (1980) also found there was no evidence for joint conjugal roles in the 38 middle-class couples, although 45% of these couples had shared responsibilities when it came to caring for their children. Edgell also critically introduced the idea of which partner makes what decisions - he found that husbands made all the decisions relating to large sums of money (moving, finance and car). From all these sources, as disagreeing as some of them are, we can tell that the family is resilient - it adapts over time and is flexible enough to fit the society and circumstances it is faced with. We are still in this period of transition right now - although we have many sources to prove Young & Willmott wrong about whether the family is symmetrical or not, this does not necessarily mean that the symmetrical family is a myth. It may not fully exist as Young & Willmott claim, but it is beginning to as we are already in a period of transition towards it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of the family.

    4 star(s)

    that the monogamous nuclear family developed to solve the problem of the inheritance of private property. Some Marxists feel the functions of the family can be performed by alternative institutions, therefore the family is not significant. Engels felt in a capitalist society, within a family, women are exploited and prevented from achieving equality.

  2. In what ways does education effect social changes between one generation and the next?

    Functionalists maintain that there is a high degree of equality of opportunity within the education system Functionalism stresses the link between education and the economy. A malfunctioning educational system would be one in which individuals are not assigned the most appropriate role, and will hence lead to inefficiency.

  1. Assess the view that the modern family is symmetrical

    All of the women questioned saw their primary role as that of looking after the home and the needs of the family. However, it should be noted that all of the women surveyed were solely housewives and did no paid employment outside of the home and the research was only based on a sample of 40 women.

  2. Discuss the major changes to have taken place in family life in Britain since ...

    Divorce Reform Act' (Allan, G.1985:101), however one could argue that the rising divorce rates were reflected by the Act itself rather than the Act shaping the increase. In keeping with this in today's society 'Around forty percent of marriages now end in divorce' (Giddens, 2001).

  1. 'Assess the contribution made by feminists' sociologists to the study of the family'

    Functionalists see the family as a building block of society. They follow the human body analogy which is the model society that suggests that al society's institutions work together to maintain equilibrium and avoid anomie. Functionalist Talcott Parsons claimed that the family retains 2 vital functions for society to remain

  2. In what ways does "Modern times" capture the main features of an industrial capitalist ...

    Thompson supported this view that Chaplin provided, as he believed that a change in time lead to a change in the workers discipline as workers were not only alienated because of employee and employer relations but also because of what employees wanted to do and what employees have to in

  1. To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society?

    However, they feel that this is built in to the capitalist system. Irene Bruegel felt that women not only performed a valuable unpaid role as domestic workers, but also provided a 'reserve army of labour'. Juliet Mitchell in 1971 agreed with Engels' argument that women should be freed from domestic

  2. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    This research is based on, very personal information about the family, so it was imperative I kept to this. In order to achieve, this I decided that the questionnaire should not ask for their name, as this does not allow for any potential identification of the he participant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work