• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Examine the effects of industrialisation on the structure of the family'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Examine the effects of industrialisation on the structure of the family' The Industrial Revolution was from 1750's - 1850's, which had four main effects. One was the Economic system becoming industrial from agriculture, the second was Mechanisation meaning production in factories becoming more efficient, the third was Urbanisation and the fourth was population explosion - low mobility rate and higher birth rate. Tallcott Parsons (1950's) believed that the extended family in pre Industrial Britain was the most beneficial as they were a unit of production and they were able to maintain a subsistence level of existence with very little reliance on non-family members. Parsons believed that post industrialisation, the nuclear family became the new dominant family structure for reasons such as geographical mobility. Parsons suggested that the extended family had disadvantages in the industrial society such as the nuclear family containing basic roles i.e. carrying out the families essential functions and the functions of the wider kinship was taken over for example by the welfare state (1948) Michael Anderson carried out a study (Preston - North West England) ...read more.

Middle

They essentially ignore middle class and concentrate on the working class families. Young and Willmott say that stage one was represented by the pre industrial family. They believe that in stage one the family work together as a team for example in agriculture. They say that this family was as a result of the industrial revolution, but it continued into the nineteenth century and is still represented in the minority of families today. Stage two of their studies researched its peak in early twentieth century. The family ceased to be a unit of production due to industrial members being employed as wage earners. In early nineteenth century working class poverty was widespread, Y&W agree with Anderson in the fact that the family responded to the high unemployment by extending its network to include relatives beyond the nuclear family. The extension of the nuclear family was built by women in defence of themselves and their children. Women formed a trade union which excluded men. Y&W claim husbands were pushed out of the female circle and took to the pub as their own defence. ...read more.

Conclusion

and submit to their control if they feel they are getting a good return on their investment of tome, energy and emotion. David cheal criticises Goode's theories as being closely related to the modernist view of progress. He particularly attacks Parsons saying faith in progress expressed by writers like parsons ignored contradictions within modernity. From a Marxist perspective the nuclear family benefited capitalism as it can be used as an ideological apparatus to promote the capitalist values rather than benefiting the whole of society, this is because consumer advertising is directed at the nuclear family nuclear for example adverts for cereals, it encourages them to pursue capitalist goals by stressing the importance of materialism. Although Radical feminists believe the nuclear family benefits the needs of men rather than all of society. This is because radicals believe that men and women are socialised into a set of ideas that largely confirms male power and superiority, it transmits patriarchal ideology encouraging the nation that the sexual division of labour is natural. It would appear that we are moving more into a nuclear family structure but it is unlikely for the movement to be as fast as Parsons suggests. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Changes in Family Roles

    I will state each of my aims and explain how they have been answered by either the secondary sources or the primary sources. "Indentifying the traditional ideas of men and women within in the family and whether they have changed."

  2. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    "I purpose that there is no such thing as 'normal families' [the nuclear family]. " * Talcott Parsons (1955) in the book Family socialisation and Interaction Process "the changes that have taken place in the family and the nature of the modern family are related to the impact of the process of industrialisation" * Mike Featherstone (1991)

  1. Rationale - I have decided to study the gender-oriented issue of conjugal roles in ...

    I now think that this time period was not suitable, as this was too short. People may spend longer than half an hour on certain tasks such as hovering and so this may not have been recorded in the diary.

  2. How did the effects of the Industrial Revolution influence the ordinary lives of working ...

    There was no nation-wide wage programme; each area's economy was shaped by its success within industry. Taking both hypothesis's into account then, it is generally more acceptable to account that 'wages grew slowly; for long periods they either did not grow at all or actually fell back, while severe recessions could also real wages substantially' (Feinstein, 1992).

  1. The Social Effects of the Industrial Revolution

    He shows that "deposits increased to 14.3 million pounds by 1829, and to almost 30 million pounds by 1850" (Doty 100). This increase in savings is due primarily to the introduction of the factory system because another scholar, H.O. Horne, researched that "the 30 million pounds of deposits in 1847 were predominantly the savings of wage-earners" (Horne 116).

  2. Gender advertising

    The "reader" is the "customer," and today the advertising industry is brainstorming about who the customer is. "What drives Sybil?" is the name for a market survey conducted by the advertising firm Lintas to study consumer profiles. "The AP Lintas universe6 prefers to slice Indian consumers into survivors, savers, enhancers, and splurgers.

  1. Aesthetic Labour at 'Brewsters' family theme pub.

    and robotic lifeless society. . Thus, HRM claim to target the heart and soul of employees (Bolton, 2004), but this is questionable as the emotional self is too erratic and diverse to be fully controlled and understood. Perhaps we forget some of the organisational prescribed ideals as the interaction role throws up new challenges.

  2. Examine the effects of industrialisation on the structure of the family

    He believed that the industrial revolution brought about the dramatic change from the extended family to the nuclear and three fundamental changes to society. Industrialisation brought the geographically mobile workforce and no longer was the ascription of jobs important, instead achievement became the main and most important method once education had been introduced.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work