How far can differences between men and women be attributed to biology and how far are they culturally determined? Which aspects of the socialisation process are most influential in your opinion?

Authors Avatar

How far can differences between men and women be attributed to biology and how far are they culturally determined? Which aspects of the socialisation process are most influential in your opinion?

Support your views with examples and theories.

Between men and women there are obvious biological differences that we can identify with. I am going to discuss how much biology compared to culture can affect a person’s gender.

Sociobiology is the way social behaviour is determined by biological drives and genetic programming. E.O. Wilson (1975) describes that each sex has different strategies for mating and reproduction and that these are reflected in a variety of aspects of social behaviour. For example males are genetically programmed to be more promiscuous, while females are disposed to nurture their offspring and remain loyal to one partner. But there are women who are promiscuous and men that stay loyal. This theory could be argued against that this behaviour by males and females is more culturally determined. As men could just take on this promiscuous role to fit in with their peer group for example. Differences between men and women can also be a result of our evolutionary past. Robin Fox (1976) states that throughout our human history men were hunters and women stayed at home nursing children. Women developed skills of foraging and nurturing children rather than the strength and aggression required for hunting. Fox sees these differences in physique and mental skills as part of our genetic inheritance today.

The argument of sociology is controversial as it ignores the influence culture has on gender and sexuality. As I pointed out with Wilson’s theory there is no scientific proof that men and women take on these roles because of their biological aspects and the only other reason for these differences is the affect of ideology.

Freud’s psychoanalytic theory describes the sexual development of children through biology and culture. He describes the way a child develops an adult sexual identity appropriate to his or her sex, with the boy identifying with his father and the girl identifying with her mother. This process develops through five stages. The first two stages, the Oral stage and the anal stage are biological. With the baby deriving pleasures from the lips and mouth and then to the anus and excretory functions. The third stage is the phallic stage where the boy eventually identifies with his father and the girl identifies with her mother. The latency stage is when the sex drive is less obvious. The final stage is called the Genital stage when the individual should have developed identification with their own sex. Freud’s theory describes to us how we develop our gender identities through biology and culture. I think they both play a key role in the differences between men and women. The biology is a basic first thought of identifying our gender then the culture playing a more dominant role. We identify with our mothers and fathers therefore I think we try to copy their individual attributes.

Join now!

Parson assumed that different roles for men and women were natural and inevitable. In family life men tend to perform the instrumental tasks, for example earning an income, while women perform expressive tasks, for example providing psychological support for the family. This explanation by Parson is mainly in biological terms. But in today’s society culture has changed these roles, as now women go out to work and provide an income for the family as well as still providing psychological support for the family. This again shows the dominant role culture can have over the differences between men and women. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay