• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"It's easy to become a football hooligan!" With reference to football hooliganism in Britain and the latest theories and research, state your views to agree or disagree with the statement?

Extracts from this document...


Year 11 Soccer Assignment "It's easy to become a football hooligan!" With reference to football hooliganism in Britain and the latest theories and research, state your views to agree or disagree with the statement? Who are hooligans and why do they do it? Discuss the latest theories. Football hooligans are noisy, violent people who want to make trouble. Evidence suggests that most of these hooligans are in their late teens or early 20's. And also that they come from mainly working class backgrounds. It is also suggested that generally hooligans are from low-income occupations- some are unemployed or are working in a poor economy. Hooliganism is actually non-violent. Hooliganism involves verbally abusing rival fans, threatening them with attack and most of the time they aim to have a laugh. Although seem of them do seem more interested in fighting rival groups who are, like themselves, looking for trouble. What is the motivation of the hooligans? There are many theories for this. The main reason is said to be the risk and excitement involved in hooliganism drives people (esp. them who are in their late teens or early 20's). For example, the British sociologist Paul Willis (sociologist analytical theory) talks about the tension involved in the fight situations and the risk in these attractive situations is what makes them do it. The sociological approach also states that male hooligans are formed because young men are expected to be able to look after themselves. ...read more.


I have seen hooliganism in Cricket myself in a match between England and India in India where some people started throwing water bottles (known as water missiles) and other stuff on the English cricket players. As we have read from the theories, the main of hooligan-like behavior is to get loyalties, be honored, and be involved in risk. Though the difference was that since it was an International match in India- there was no hooligan in the rivalry. Hooliganism is not tied to a sport as I said. Hooligans disturb matches because of the many reasons I have explained from the three different theories. Why is hooliganism linked to football? Well, I think that hooliganism is related to football simply because of the explanation given by the social theory and the others. The socail-pyschological theory tells us that these football fans have a passion for football. Hooliganism is a way to search for a peak experience, which is an intense, emotional experience not usually encountered in everyday life. Peak experiences allow for an open expression of collective emotionality: an outpouring of joy or sadness, and a strengthening of a common social identity via suporting a team. And since football is the world's most popular and one of the most intense sports it has got more advertisement in that manner. Hooliganism in football would hence be the easiest and best way to get loyalties, raise your status, have a peak experience and have risks. ...read more.


If you live in an environment where there is some existence of shame and security, a person would not get involved in such activities, (which is again found widely in the Eastern Hemisphere). If you looked at what the sociological theory is closely: The rewards involved in such activities like the loyalty and the entertainment you get from hooligan involvement is very valuable for these young men whose opportunities for status and excitement from other ways are very limited. Now, if you get opportunities and excitement and the involvement in risk (if required) from other ways (excelling in studies, participating in state or club teams and gaining reputation etc.) these activities will not at all be necessary to do. There is some affect of how you are brought up and what environment you live in. Peer pressure comes into play. And so do so many other factors. What I mean to say is that it depends upon how you are suppressed under the factors i.e. are all the factors positive to say that your requirements are of one to become a hooligan. It is very hard to answer this question that why some young men, rather than others, might find this sort of activity attractive and rewarding. Nor is it clear why, at particular times and in particular kinds of societies or in particular places, hooliganism of this kind should become so attractive. What my opinion is that things should match with those in the theories to give us some sense of realization that this person might be a hooligan because of these reasons. It is not easy to become a hooligan but it is not hard also. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. "Age is a social construct". How far do you agree with this statement?

    Many societies don't have a definite period of transition from childhood to adulthood but a ceremony that initiates the child at a certain age, these vary from culture to culture. Often in tribal cultures the transition from child to adult is some sort of challenge to prove that he is

  2. A Study of Football Hooliganism: Are Football Hooligans "Real" Fans?

    Disadvantages: The interviewer must ask the question in such a way, which does not influence the person answering the question. This method is expensive and time-consuming. > People are given a form to fill in themselves. Advantages: The person filling the questionnaire has time to answer the questions.

  1. "Religion may encourage rather than inhibit Social Change," Critically discuss this statement with reference ...

    Also it is important to note that Weber was not saying that religion always caused change, but that it could be an important factor. Weber highlights the fact that ideas can conceivably lead to economic change. G.K. Nelson also gives arguments for religion as an initiator of social change.

  2. Compare and contrast the six main sociological theories of religion as well as examining ...

    Catholicism, for example, stresses that people can commit the worst crimes and lead the most debauched lives and still enter heaven as long as there is genuine remorse before death. The religion stresses the forgiving, loving nature of God and that there is no certainty of anyone being saved or condemned.

  1. This essay proposes to discuss different accounts of the welfare state by both mainstream ...

    Other feminist's such as Barnes (1997) have also looked into gender differences in the welfare state by studying informal care, and the gendered consequences of it. Barnes claims that women have the main responsibility for informal (unpaid) care. (1997: 13)

  2. Karl Marx and Vladimir Ilich Lenin - look at their very similar views on ...

    Lenin saw the state as a "machine for the oppression of one class by another."3 Marx and Lenin did see the French Revolution as an advancement, but not in the way that they would have hoped. The French Revolution established the Rights of the Citizen and the Rights of Man,

  1. Social and action theories

    the discretion of the Bourgeoisie even though it is actually the Proletariats that create their wealth and power initially. The Bourgeoisie ensure that Proletariats remain committed to providing their labour by convincing the Proletariat that the economic system is based upon freedom, fairness and equality.

  2. Does Boxing have a future?

    The boxing skills which are recognised today, and which the Greeks may have developed before they were over run (Source Brooke-Ball 2000), were never given a chance to evolve by the Romans. This sordid weapon along with boxing itself was finally abandoned and abolished when the Roman Empire fell in the fifth century AD.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work