• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of Education And Give Some Critical Evaluation Of Each

Extracts from this document...


Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of Education And Give Some Critical Evaluation Of Each This essay is going to look at the Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist theories of education and outline the key points; it will also provide some criticism in relation to each of the theories. Although the theories are mainly very different, they all have the similarity of suggesting that a person's social class will contribute greatly to how well they will do at school and also on how this will affect the type and importance of a career they may take up. Functionalism investigates institutions to consider the functions that they perform in society. The functionalist premise is that if an institution exists then there has got to be a reason for its existence. Functionalists assume that educational institutions serve some societal need; schools are examined for the positive contribution that they make towards maintaining society. Talcott Parsons suggested that educational institutions provide the function of general socialisation of the whole of the population into the dominant culture, values and beliefs of a society. Parsons also suggested that schools select people for different types and levels of education. He believed that education meets the needs of the system by making sure that all children have a basic commitment to their society's values and beliefs and also by preparing individuals for their specific roles within the social hierarchy. ...read more.


Marxist theory suggests that one of the functions of education is to provide capitalists with a workforce that provides the most useful traits for them. The education system succeeds in achieving objectives mainly through the hidden curriculum. Bowles and Gintis suggest that high grades are awarded to the pupils who are punctual, consistent, dependable and persevering whereas low grades are given to the pupils who are creative, aggressive and independent, which means that grades are not awarded in accordance with the pupils academic abilities, but instead they are awarded depending on their personality traits. Another theory put forward by Bowles and Gintis is that there is a hidden curriculum which encourages an acceptance of hierarchy. The teacher is at the top of the chain of command and control and the pupils have to listen and conform. Pupils tend to not have any control in regards to the subjects that they study and they are used to being given orders from the teachers which they must obey. This prepares them for the social hierarchy that they will encounter when they go to work, where they will have to listen to orders form their managers and supervisors and they will have to comply with those orders, just as they do at school. ...read more.


Likewise a student who is streamed onto a high level course and is expected to achieve, may want to rebel against what everybody else expects of them and so they may become a trouble maker and start to underachieve in order to defy the teacher who has typed them as an achiever. It is hard to understand what kind of effect labelling and streaming will have on a person, because everybody is different and just because some pupils are of the opinion that if they are going to be labelled as a troublemaker and streamed onto a low level course, then they might as well act as how they are expected to act and live up to the label placed on them, but this doesn't mean that all pupils who are labelled and streamed will behave in the same manner. In conclusion, all of the theories that have been outlined in this essay seem to agree that social class background plays a major role in educational achievement. Both functionalist and Marxist theories agree that the school plays the role of socialising students into the prevailing norms and values of a society. Interactionist theories are mainly concerned with the interactions that a student has with their tutor and fellow peers at school, if a pupil has negative interactions with a tutor, it will encourage them to perform badly in the subject. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Views on Society and Education.

    are inter-related, they see that the laws are made in the interest of everyone within the society. A Marxist believes that there are two classes, the Bourgeoisie who are the ruling class and the Proletariat who are the working class.

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    These two forms of discrimination have become popularly known as 'racism'. (Race - definitions Handout) Sheila Patterson's 1965 study of "Dark Strangers" was based on the first-generation of immigrants from the West Indies, entering Britain namely, Brixton in London throughout the 1950's.

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Religion also makes people believe the suffering endured by oppression is a virtue. People believe they are rewarded for their pain and those that are rich and live luxurious lives are less likely to get into heaven. Religion offers hope that supernatural powers will intervene to solve problems, the anticipation makes life more bearable.

  2. Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist perspectives on the family

    Both functionalists and Marxists look at the family from a macro perspective and therefore do not look closely at the effects on the individual. They believe that the reproduction of children and teaching of norms and values are important to keep society going.

  1. Diversity - Gender and education Factors such as ethnicity, economic status and gender can ...

    The view that girls achieve higher in education than boys is much debated. The way in which gender roles are constructed and the process of socialisation is highly complex and is still being considered. In view of this, it is fundamental to understand that differences in educational outcomes focused on gender also have class and ethnicity elements to consider.

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    all needing to be socialised and conform together, the body fights diseases where as in a similar way society has the police and the legal system. (6) Functionalists stress the positive elements in the substructure, saying that there is an open and fair system in place, firstly the State, we

  1. Discuss the Marxist and Functionalist Perspectives on the Family

    Murdock critically claimed that the nuclear family was universal. Murdock did not appreciate alternative studies such as Banaro, New Guinea where instead of the 'father' being biological to his son/daughter, in fact the father's friend was the biological father to his friend's son/daughter. Murdock believed families were joined by a common residence, economic cooperation and reproduction.

  2. The Hidden Curriculum; Hegemony and Capitalism.

    The hidden curriculum ultimately assists in the production of the technical administrative knowledge required among other things to expand markets, control production, labour and people and engage in basic and applied research needed by industry. As part of this hidden curriculum is a concept known as streaming, which is the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work