• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Fundamental Differences Between Functionalism, Marxism and Social Action Theory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FUNCTIONALISM, MARXISM AND SOCIAL ACTION THEORY. The three most commonly mentioned sociological perspectives are Functionalism, which is a system theory. Marxism which is often seen as a conflict theory and in addition there is also Social Action Theory. This theory is often described as the alternative theory as it deals with people and how they define themselves. There have been many varied and interesting debates concerning the similarities and differences between the three over the years. I shall try to explain the differences and similarities in the following essay. I shall use quote from Giddens, Sociology in focus and also Sociology Themes and Perspectives. A perspective is a set of views and beliefs; they explain how something works. They are actually a particular way of looking at something in depth. The sociological perspective can be best understood in terms of such phrases as seeing through, looking behind. Very much as such phrases would be employed in common speech i.e. looking behind the scenes, in other words etc. (Sociology in focus 5th Edition 2000 page 1) The founding fathers of the three perspectives are as follows: August Comte, Emile Durkheim and Talcott Parsons are known as the three best-known Functionalists. ...read more.

Middle

Functionalists believe that all social groups will benefit if their society runs smoothly and prospers. (Haralambos and Holborn, 5th Edition, 2001, page 11). If society as a whole prosper we all benefit, thus leading to a more harmonious society in general. Tallcott Parsons is quoted as saying that the main task of sociology is to examine the institutionalisation patterns of value orientation. We place great emphasis on socialisation therefore transmitting our values and norms to the next generation. (Haralambos and Holborn, 5th Edition, 2001, page 10). Marxism like functionalism is concerned with the overall picture of society. Marxism is seen as a conflict theory, Mainly because they see the primary interests of society as a whole as being made up of conflicting groups with conflicting interests or beliefs. We are a very materialistic society. A society made up of those who have, and those who have not. Marxists sociologists say that there will never be true social harmony because there are too many inequalities within our cultural society. Marx gave names to the haves and have nots, they are known as the Bourgeoise and the Proletariats. One way of assessing the power of the upper class is through the study of elites (people who fill the top positions in each of the major institutions of society); most of the sociological debates have centered on economic elites and political elites. ...read more.

Conclusion

Marx also believed that the class conflict would worsen as time went by. His main hope was that we would eventually live in a classness society. Social Action Theory is often described as the alternative theory to the other two. We must try and imagine that each individual and the social groups that they belong to define who they are, as opposed to taking into account the overall view. Social Actionists see people as individuals who have a right to react as and how they wish. They say that how we react with each other in our society is largely up to us as individual social being. Social Action Theory is A social perspective that focuses on the meaning and intensions that underpin human actions. Social active perspectives are concerned with the way in which the human actively and creatively interprets the world around them. Rather than the external forces which could be used as a guide (Giddens 4th Edition, 2001, page 698) We all make choices within our own lives in other words, from what we eat to when we sleep, where we live and who to talk to. According to Weber. Individuals have the abilty to act freely. We should not be bound by outside constraints (Giddens 4th Edition,2001, page 13) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of the family.

    4 star(s)

    In his enthusiasm for the family, however, Murdock did not seriously consider whether other social institutions could perform its functions and he does not examine alternatives to the family, for example the Israeli Kibbutz; these are not families but a kibbutz is a settlement where members work together and share property.

  2. This essay will compare two different sociological perspectives Marxism and Functionalism through society and ...

    All together these form a collective conscience that holds society together. This collective conscience is then transmitted through large-scale units where all individuals in society have shared goals as well as social connections between the individuals are promoted (Coakley and Dunning, 2004)

  1. The differences and similarities between functionism, marxism, and social action theory.

    Social control is one aspect of functionalism; we are kept in line by the mechanisms of social control. Functionalism views society as a living organism such as the human body, the functioning of the human body depends on the heart, brain, lungs and other vital organs if any of these parts fail it would affect the entire body (society).

  2. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    seen as a structured collection of roles and norms designed to reinforce accepted patterns of behaviour. To maintain social order these rules must be reinforced through social controls in the form of formal or informal sanctions such as a fixed fine penalty or a disapproving look, respectively.

  1. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    However, the Irish, it could be argued, might find it substantially easier to become absorbed into the British population. In this instance skin colour could be a significant factor in 'race relations', as there are less noticeable differences - especially from the next generation, who's accent would have become diluted.

  2. The essay will begin by looking at what normality and social construction is and ...

    If this is so then how children with special needs are going to receive the education they deserve does this mean that the education system sees them as second class citizens. The fundamental aim of normalization in this definition ensures that people with learning difficulties enjoyed their rights to the same quality of life as non -disabled member of society.

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    A range of Q's but in an order. Researcher builds a rapport with interviewee. Prompts respondent to talk about personal issues + feelings. Conversation may be taped + notes from it are developed after the interview. It is a good way of gaining an insight into another person's emotional world but interviewers need to be highly skilled in this method.

  2. Main features of Functionalism.

    This model comprises of: 1. The human actor; 2. Goals or ends that an actor must choose between; and 3. Different means by which these goals may be achieved, again the actor choosing between them. However, the choices are not made in a vacuum.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work