• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society? Families are crucially important to society without doubt. Most British people are born into families and then raised by a family. Most of these very same people grow up to form families of their own and take the responsibility of being a parent. Many people see the family as the normal way of life and watch television programs which revolve around family life. For many the nuclear family has always been viewed as the proper way to bring up children and to live life. However, the subject of families is much deeper than many think. But is the family beneficial to society? Different groups have different views on how beneficial the family is to society. Functionalists, who traditionally dominated the sociology of the family, feel that the family is necessary for the running and continuation of an integrated society. It is assumed by functionalists that if there is the existence of a social institution, then it must have a purpose or a function. Functionalists therefore see the family as beneficial for society. To functionalists, society is an 'organism' that contains different segments which come together to keep society running smoothly. They argue that the family interrelates to other social institutions. ...read more.


Another view from Marxism is that the economy benefits from the family as the family produces new workers for society. A Marxist writer, Engels, has two main points to his argument. Firstly, that the family serves the requirements of the capitalist economy and secondly that the family prevents women from achieving equality both inside and outside the home. Engels felt that women were oppressed by the family. Women were dependant on their husbands economically and were expected to keep faithful to their husband. However it was regarded as legitimate for men to be unfaithful and use prostitutes. In this way, Engels was critical of the family but still wanted the family to exist. Engels' main view that women cannot achieve equality because the family prevents it from happening and that the requirements of society are served by the family are seen as central by many critics of the family. The main Marxist arguments about the family differ from functionalist opinions considerably. Marxists do not see the family as beneficial to everyone, and in particular stress that women are disadvantaged in the family. However, Marxists do feel that society benefits from the existence of the nuclear family as it develops the next generation of workers. Marxist-feminists use a gender-based analysis of the family and feel that women are oppressed within the family and the wider society. ...read more.


Family members expect too much from each other in his view. Leach is criticised, as he has not carried out detailed fieldwork to support his claims. His view could be labelled as extreme and unbalanced according to critics. It is clear that there are contrasting opinions on whether or not the family is beneficial to society. Functionalists strongly believe that the family is beneficial to the running of society and New Right agree that the family's main function of raising and socialising children is of some benefit. Other views such as Marxists and Feminists have other ideas. Marxists stress that not everyone in society benefits from the family, especially women who are at a disadvantage behind males. Then there are the more extreme views from feminists who strongly believe that women are oppressed in society and the only people who benefit are men. Critical theories argue that the family has harming effects on individual development. The family lifestyle is seen as damaging to a child's up bringing and can cause problems for the child in later life. These theories explain how individuals find it hard to develop themselves as a person in the family because other family members influence them and family relationships can lead to unnecessary emotions coming out. Certain sociologists agree on the subject of the family being beneficial to society, others do not, and the contrasting views lead to fascinating arguments over the true meaning of family life in society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the Functionalist claim that the family benefits both individuals and society as a ...

    5 star(s)

    This theory has also been called the "warm bath" theory, as it explains how the women provide an emotional role, and he claims that the family is a relaxing environment. The New Right Perspective also believes that the Nuclear family is the normal family and ideal family.

  2. Examine the claim made by some feminist sociologists that marriage and family life can ...

    It is argued mainly by New Right and Functionalist sociologists that there is an "ideal family" which should have the following characteristics: * It should be nuclear in structure (ie.based on father, mother and children) * It should be based on marriage rather cohabitation.

  1. Different views on the family.

    Overall Murdock states that the family has four roles in society. These are * Reproduction * Stabilisation of sexual relationships * Economic function * Primary source of socialisation More evidence for the strength of the family unit is the negativity of communes.

  2. The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each ...

    However, Parsons study fails to recognise its overall focus on 'white' middle class American families and therefore it offers no insight into families belonging to other classes or ethnicity. Parson's study on families implies that it can be transferred to most industrialised societies - however, industrialised societies vary in their cultures and so this could be difficult to ascertain.

  1. 'Assess the contribution made by feminists' sociologists to the study of the family'

    Also Engel's view that the family was invented at the same time in history as private property, crosses over with early feminists. Monogamy was invented to control women in order to establish legitimate lines of inheritance fro private property. This was done because fathers needed a stable sense of who

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    about any fight for a "better world" you have no intrinsic value on life. Copy cat crimes and anorexia can be blamed on the media giving the wrong impression, the bourgeoisie advertising all their great products for the proletariat to buy.

  1. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    Which is why, a closed question is more appropriate. My research consisted of asking 24 people from the Friesland Sixth Form centre, to fill in a questionnaire. I selected my research population by using Quota Sampling. The Quota, which I shall use, will be 12 females and 12 males at

  2. Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of ...

    Michael Anderson carried out a study (Preston - North West England) based on a sample of 10% census records (1851). His results showed that 23% of households in Preston were mostly extended families as they included kin beyond the nuclear family.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work