• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society? Families are crucially important to society without doubt. Most British people are born into families and then raised by a family. Most of these very same people grow up to form families of their own and take the responsibility of being a parent. Many people see the family as the normal way of life and watch television programs which revolve around family life. For many the nuclear family has always been viewed as the proper way to bring up children and to live life. However, the subject of families is much deeper than many think. But is the family beneficial to society? Different groups have different views on how beneficial the family is to society. Functionalists, who traditionally dominated the sociology of the family, feel that the family is necessary for the running and continuation of an integrated society. It is assumed by functionalists that if there is the existence of a social institution, then it must have a purpose or a function. Functionalists therefore see the family as beneficial for society. To functionalists, society is an 'organism' that contains different segments which come together to keep society running smoothly. They argue that the family interrelates to other social institutions. ...read more.

Middle

Another view from Marxism is that the economy benefits from the family as the family produces new workers for society. A Marxist writer, Engels, has two main points to his argument. Firstly, that the family serves the requirements of the capitalist economy and secondly that the family prevents women from achieving equality both inside and outside the home. Engels felt that women were oppressed by the family. Women were dependant on their husbands economically and were expected to keep faithful to their husband. However it was regarded as legitimate for men to be unfaithful and use prostitutes. In this way, Engels was critical of the family but still wanted the family to exist. Engels' main view that women cannot achieve equality because the family prevents it from happening and that the requirements of society are served by the family are seen as central by many critics of the family. The main Marxist arguments about the family differ from functionalist opinions considerably. Marxists do not see the family as beneficial to everyone, and in particular stress that women are disadvantaged in the family. However, Marxists do feel that society benefits from the existence of the nuclear family as it develops the next generation of workers. Marxist-feminists use a gender-based analysis of the family and feel that women are oppressed within the family and the wider society. ...read more.

Conclusion

Family members expect too much from each other in his view. Leach is criticised, as he has not carried out detailed fieldwork to support his claims. His view could be labelled as extreme and unbalanced according to critics. It is clear that there are contrasting opinions on whether or not the family is beneficial to society. Functionalists strongly believe that the family is beneficial to the running of society and New Right agree that the family's main function of raising and socialising children is of some benefit. Other views such as Marxists and Feminists have other ideas. Marxists stress that not everyone in society benefits from the family, especially women who are at a disadvantage behind males. Then there are the more extreme views from feminists who strongly believe that women are oppressed in society and the only people who benefit are men. Critical theories argue that the family has harming effects on individual development. The family lifestyle is seen as damaging to a child's up bringing and can cause problems for the child in later life. These theories explain how individuals find it hard to develop themselves as a person in the family because other family members influence them and family relationships can lead to unnecessary emotions coming out. Certain sociologists agree on the subject of the family being beneficial to society, others do not, and the contrasting views lead to fascinating arguments over the true meaning of family life in society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the Functionalist claim that the family benefits both individuals and society as a ...

    5 star(s)

    It can also be said that the idea of the division of labour - men have Instrumental role, women have Expressive role - is an old theory, and does not apply to families in modern society, as men and women's supposed "roles" cross.

  2. Changes in Family Roles

    child would live with one of their parents and their new wife/husband or girlfriend/boyfriend. From this graph it is clear that al family structures have changed from 1970. They have all changed in numbers; this could be taken to mean that there is still balance in the structure.

  1. Is George Murdock's 'Nuclear Family' still, the norm in British society?

    so I decided to scale this number down by half which is 25 and the closest even number to is 24. I choose people from my sixth form centre to fill in my questionnaire, as I thought that because they would know it is for a piece of coursework, they

  2. Functionalist sociologists agree the family is the key foundation to society.

    Society was constantly changing and becoming modern, factories and building were becoming developed; there was a wide range of jobs individuals could achieve towards. Parsons argues that it was easier for the nuclear family to move, and they best suited the modern industry.

  1. Examine the claim made by some feminist sociologists that marriage and family life can ...

    Radical Feminist also see the family as key in maintaining male superiority. Feminist information I received from the internet, published by someone with the name "Sadashivan" raises the following points: * "First education she receives from her parents is to live with arguing (do as told)

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    John Rex and Sally Tomlinson's 1979 study of "Colonial Immigrants in a British City: a Class Analysis", shares common characteristics with Castles and Kosack's study (1973), in that both identified the problems faced by immigrants in the labour market. However Rex and Tomlinson's study opposes the theory that immigrants can

  1. The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each ...

    significant role in industry - which maintains society - his employment responsibilities should therefore not be interfered with. This also refers to the extended family for which the male is not responsible. Parsons indicates that obligations to extended family, out with the nuclear family, disrupts the freedom of career mobility and reliability - which in turn affects society.

  2. Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of ...

    Parsons suggested that the extended family had disadvantages in the industrial society such as the nuclear family containing basic roles i.e. carrying out the families essential functions and the functions of the wider kinship was taken over for example by the welfare state (1948)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work