• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society? Families are crucially important to society without doubt. Most British people are born into families and then raised by a family. Most of these very same people grow up to form families of their own and take the responsibility of being a parent. Many people see the family as the normal way of life and watch television programs which revolve around family life. For many the nuclear family has always been viewed as the proper way to bring up children and to live life. However, the subject of families is much deeper than many think. But is the family beneficial to society? Different groups have different views on how beneficial the family is to society. Functionalists, who traditionally dominated the sociology of the family, feel that the family is necessary for the running and continuation of an integrated society. It is assumed by functionalists that if there is the existence of a social institution, then it must have a purpose or a function. Functionalists therefore see the family as beneficial for society. To functionalists, society is an 'organism' that contains different segments which come together to keep society running smoothly. They argue that the family interrelates to other social institutions. ...read more.

Middle

Another view from Marxism is that the economy benefits from the family as the family produces new workers for society. A Marxist writer, Engels, has two main points to his argument. Firstly, that the family serves the requirements of the capitalist economy and secondly that the family prevents women from achieving equality both inside and outside the home. Engels felt that women were oppressed by the family. Women were dependant on their husbands economically and were expected to keep faithful to their husband. However it was regarded as legitimate for men to be unfaithful and use prostitutes. In this way, Engels was critical of the family but still wanted the family to exist. Engels' main view that women cannot achieve equality because the family prevents it from happening and that the requirements of society are served by the family are seen as central by many critics of the family. The main Marxist arguments about the family differ from functionalist opinions considerably. Marxists do not see the family as beneficial to everyone, and in particular stress that women are disadvantaged in the family. However, Marxists do feel that society benefits from the existence of the nuclear family as it develops the next generation of workers. Marxist-feminists use a gender-based analysis of the family and feel that women are oppressed within the family and the wider society. ...read more.

Conclusion

Family members expect too much from each other in his view. Leach is criticised, as he has not carried out detailed fieldwork to support his claims. His view could be labelled as extreme and unbalanced according to critics. It is clear that there are contrasting opinions on whether or not the family is beneficial to society. Functionalists strongly believe that the family is beneficial to the running of society and New Right agree that the family's main function of raising and socialising children is of some benefit. Other views such as Marxists and Feminists have other ideas. Marxists stress that not everyone in society benefits from the family, especially women who are at a disadvantage behind males. Then there are the more extreme views from feminists who strongly believe that women are oppressed in society and the only people who benefit are men. Critical theories argue that the family has harming effects on individual development. The family lifestyle is seen as damaging to a child's up bringing and can cause problems for the child in later life. These theories explain how individuals find it hard to develop themselves as a person in the family because other family members influence them and family relationships can lead to unnecessary emotions coming out. Certain sociologists agree on the subject of the family being beneficial to society, others do not, and the contrasting views lead to fascinating arguments over the true meaning of family life in society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the Functionalist claim that the family benefits both individuals and society as a ...

    5 star(s)

    It is more a political perspective than a sociological one. This perspective is against lone parent families, fatherless families, cohabitation and gay and lesbian couples, as they believe the Nuclear family is now under threat from other developing types of families.

  2. Changes in Family Roles

    As can be seen from this graph, many people do not marry and many get divorced. This would mean that if children are still present at the time of divorce, the family structure would go from a nuclear family to a lone parent family or a reconstituted family whereby the

  1. To what extent do sociologists agree that different levels of educational attainment are affected ...

    less likely to lead to such success as there is an emphasise put on present gratification. Sociologists say therefore that because a person is a part of a different social class, meaning their difference is only man made. Their chromosomes or genetics does not efficiently explain the difference in the working class' and middle class' educational achievement.

  2. Sex Roles in Parsons Family

    Experimental work - Bales (as above). Cross-cultural survey data - Zelditch (based on Murdock's Area File material). Psychoanalysis Parsons recognised how important psychoanalysis is for sociology, particularly with reference to socialization, role conformity and gender. However, he does not seem to question the assumption of orthodox psychoanalysis that there is

  1. Functionalist sociologists agree the family is the key foundation to society.

    Social mobile workforce is based on a society which is constantly changing and evolving. It involves family members who have certain skills in order to achieve to their highest potential. Social mobile workforce enables members to progress and is able to accomplish towards a promotion.

  2. Since the Industrial revelation the nuclear family has been recognised as the norm of ...

    to the poor living conditions in early industrial period and as there was no welfare state (1948). Peter Laslett researched the patterns of the family life in England Industrial Revolution; he conducted his research from parish records. As a result of his research he provides evidence that the large extended family households were relatively uncommon in the Pre Industrial society.

  1. Sociology – The Family.

    1948 saw the introduction of the welfare state and the birth of the National Health Service, the gaps between rich and poor narrowed as health improved and lifespan increased. Poverty was addressed by the state using public money, this allowed women to claim benefits, and for many meant that for

  2. Notes on Violence in Society

    Homelessness 1. Homeless people are nearly four times as likely to be murdered as the general population. The average expectancy of a homeless person is 47 years. 1. Bullying 1. Being called names, being teased, being pushed or pulled around, being hit or attacked, having your bag or other

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work