• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do sociologists argue that the family is beneficial to society? Families are crucially important to society without doubt. Most British people are born into families and then raised by a family. Most of these very same people grow up to form families of their own and take the responsibility of being a parent. Many people see the family as the normal way of life and watch television programs which revolve around family life. For many the nuclear family has always been viewed as the proper way to bring up children and to live life. However, the subject of families is much deeper than many think. But is the family beneficial to society? Different groups have different views on how beneficial the family is to society. Functionalists, who traditionally dominated the sociology of the family, feel that the family is necessary for the running and continuation of an integrated society. It is assumed by functionalists that if there is the existence of a social institution, then it must have a purpose or a function. Functionalists therefore see the family as beneficial for society. To functionalists, society is an 'organism' that contains different segments which come together to keep society running smoothly. They argue that the family interrelates to other social institutions. ...read more.

Middle

Another view from Marxism is that the economy benefits from the family as the family produces new workers for society. A Marxist writer, Engels, has two main points to his argument. Firstly, that the family serves the requirements of the capitalist economy and secondly that the family prevents women from achieving equality both inside and outside the home. Engels felt that women were oppressed by the family. Women were dependant on their husbands economically and were expected to keep faithful to their husband. However it was regarded as legitimate for men to be unfaithful and use prostitutes. In this way, Engels was critical of the family but still wanted the family to exist. Engels' main view that women cannot achieve equality because the family prevents it from happening and that the requirements of society are served by the family are seen as central by many critics of the family. The main Marxist arguments about the family differ from functionalist opinions considerably. Marxists do not see the family as beneficial to everyone, and in particular stress that women are disadvantaged in the family. However, Marxists do feel that society benefits from the existence of the nuclear family as it develops the next generation of workers. Marxist-feminists use a gender-based analysis of the family and feel that women are oppressed within the family and the wider society. ...read more.

Conclusion

Family members expect too much from each other in his view. Leach is criticised, as he has not carried out detailed fieldwork to support his claims. His view could be labelled as extreme and unbalanced according to critics. It is clear that there are contrasting opinions on whether or not the family is beneficial to society. Functionalists strongly believe that the family is beneficial to the running of society and New Right agree that the family's main function of raising and socialising children is of some benefit. Other views such as Marxists and Feminists have other ideas. Marxists stress that not everyone in society benefits from the family, especially women who are at a disadvantage behind males. Then there are the more extreme views from feminists who strongly believe that women are oppressed in society and the only people who benefit are men. Critical theories argue that the family has harming effects on individual development. The family lifestyle is seen as damaging to a child's up bringing and can cause problems for the child in later life. These theories explain how individuals find it hard to develop themselves as a person in the family because other family members influence them and family relationships can lead to unnecessary emotions coming out. Certain sociologists agree on the subject of the family being beneficial to society, others do not, and the contrasting views lead to fascinating arguments over the true meaning of family life in society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Assess the Functionalist claim that the family benefits both individuals and society as a ...

    5 star(s)

    It is more a political perspective than a sociological one. This perspective is against lone parent families, fatherless families, cohabitation and gay and lesbian couples, as they believe the Nuclear family is now under threat from other developing types of families.

  2. Functionalist sociologists agree the family is the key foundation to society.

    Social mobile workforce is based on a society which is constantly changing and evolving. It involves family members who have certain skills in order to achieve to their highest potential. Social mobile workforce enables members to progress and is able to accomplish towards a promotion.

  1. Changes in Family Roles

    These statements made about the original and modified extended family show that a lot of changes have gone on with the extended family. For one, they no longer live with each other in the "modified" extended family; this had obviously had an impact on the amount of help they get

  2. Pitted against Patriarchy

    lack of respect for such devout displays and takes up the author's voice in challenging the already shaky faith held by Judith Hearne: He laughed, 'Religion is it? And what has religion ever done for you, may I ask? Do you think God gives a damn about the likes of you and me?

  1. With reference to the family, consider how functionalist perspective enhances understanding of the diversity ...

    of the family, and the family unit has always proved to be 'an effective and readily available agency of socialisation' (Townroe, 1999, p53). Talcott Parsons, a Functionalist, sees the socialisation of children and the stabilization of adult personalities as the two main functions of the family (Bilton, 1996).

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    (Rex, 1979, page 275) Rex and Tomlinson acknowledge that there is an 'overlap' pertaining to the similar experiences endured by the 'white' working class and their new West Indian and Asian 'neighbours'. However, the common ground shared between the two is menial and therefore does not warrant the supposition that

  1. The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each ...

    As such, to ensure the smooth operation and survival of commerce, there must be strict discipline extended from all individuals working within the occupational system. Repercussions for non-conformity within the work place can be formal or informal and apply universally for those who do not obey the basic rules of industry.

  2. Notes on Violence in Society

    Pedophiles and the Internet 1. With the increased use of internet, some pedophiles have succeeded in getting to know their victims through chat rooms, perhaps by posing as children or teenagers. 1. Children and war 1. In some countries such as Colombia and Yemen, it is cheaper to buy a gun than a book.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work