• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21

What Civil Society Can Do to Develop Democracy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Civil Society Can Do to Develop Democracy Presentation to NGO Leaders, February 10, 2004, Convention Center, Baghdad Good afternoon. I want to speak to you briefly today about the role that civil society plays in building and strengthening democracy. You are all civil society leaders, who are engaged in this effort in various ways, so I am very pleased to be able to share these ideas with you. By civil society I mean the entire range of organized groups and institutions that are independent of the state, voluntary, and at least to some extent self-generating and self-reliant. This of course includes non-governmental organizations like the ones in this room, but also independent mass media, think tanks, universities, and social and religious groups. To be part of civil society, groups must meet some other conditions as well. In a democracy, civil society groups have respect for the law, for the rights of individuals, and for the rights of other groups to express their interests and opinions. Part of what the word "civil" implies is tolerance and the accommodation of pluralism and diversity. Civil society groups may establish ties to political parties and the state, but they must retain their independence, and they do not seek political power for themselves. Often in transitions, groups arise that seek to monopolize the lives and thinking of their members. These groups do not tolerate the right of their members to dissent, and they do not respect other groups that disagree with them. Some of these groups may merely be fronts for political parties or movements that seek to win control of the state. These groups are not part of civil society and they do not contribute to building a democracy. What, then, can the independent, voluntary, law-abiding, tolerant and pluralistic organizations of civil society do to build and maintain democracy? The first and most basic role of civil society is to limit and control the power of the state. ...read more.

Middle

Further Reading: Philosophy of Right, Objective Spirit and Avineri Chapter 5 and Chapter 7. What is civil society? What is civil society? Civil society is a concept located strategically at the cross-section of important strands of intellectual developments in the social sciences. To take account of the diversity of the concept, CCS adopted an initial working definition that is meant to guide research activities and teaching, but is by no means to be interpreted as a rigid statement: Civil society refers to the arena of uncoerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values. In theory, its institutional forms are distinct from those of the state, family and market, though in practice, the boundaries between state, civil society, family and market are often complex, blurred and negotiated. Civil society commonly embraces a diversity of spaces, actors and institutional forms, varying in their degree of formality, autonomy and power. Civil societies are often populated by organisations such as registered charities, development non-governmental organisations, community groups, women's organisations, faith-based organisations, professional associations, trades unions, self-help groups, social movements, business associations, coalitions and advocacy group. Why civil society? What is this sudden interest in civil society all about? Some may recall that the term was en vogue in the 18th and 19th centuries, but had long fallen into disuse, and became a term of interest to historians primarily. For CCS, the answer is obvious but full of implications. For a long time, social scientists believed that we lived in a two-sector world. There was the market or the economy on the one hand, and the state or government on the other. Our great theories speak to them, and virtually all our energy was dedicated to exploring the two institutional complexes of market and state. Nothing else seemed to matter much. Not surprisingly, 'society' was pushed to the sidelines and ultimately became a very abstract notion, relegated to the confines of sociological theorising and social philosophy, not fitting the two-sector world view that has dominated the social sciences for the last fifty years. ...read more.

Conclusion

This, said Marx, meant that the state was even more likely to protect their interests against the interests of the workers. This domination of one class over another is inevitable under capitalism and would continue until a revolution occured, instilling a classless society in which a true civil society would flourish. The Twentieth Century John Rawls John Rawls is one of the foremost political thinkers of this century. His main contribution to the concept of civil society is his theory of justice. To set a common standard viewpoint by which to judge the various means of allocating what Rawls calls primary goods, such as rights, powers, opportunities, income, wealth, and the bases for self-respect, he postulates a "veil of ignorance" that assumes that one's position and situation in life is not known. This makes it likely that decisions regarding distribution of primary goods will be made on the basis of providing a decent life for those in the worst possible situations, since the decision-makers may find that, upon lifting the veil, that is the position they themselves are in. In addition to a principle of equal liberty, which includes the right of all people to vote and hold public office, freedom of speech, conscience, thought, association, the right to private property, and due process of law, he adds a second principle of equal opportunity to compete for any position in society. These principles underscore Rawls' idea of 'political liberalism', in which he differentiates between a political realm, consisting of public institutions and social structures, and a nonpublic cultural realm, in which people interact with others in a diversity of associations according to shared moral doctrines. No single morality arising from a non-public setting should be allowed to become the basis of justice, lest the state become a repressive regime. To ensure the values of a constitutional democracy, which Rawls feels is the best kind of government since it allows for pluralism as well as stability, a constitutional consensus must be achieved through equal rights, a public discourse on political matters, and a willingness to compromise. ?? ?? ?? ?? 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. The Go-between, while a powerful story of a young boys premature involvement in an ...

    And I liked Ted Burgess in a reluctant, half-admiring, half-hating waywhen I was with him his mere physical presence cast a spell on me. Hartleys presentation of Triminghams appearance is quite displeasing, On the side of his face turned to me was a sickle-shaped scar that ran from his eye

  2. It is argued that subcultures define themselves in opposition to the dominant culture. ...

    Visual cultures include: skateboarders; graffiti artists; street dancers, various forms of 'deviant' apparel and other forms of communication through movement or gesture. These are periphery groups empowered by the space that they have created through visual representation. They cultural production is recognised by mainstream culture and in that recognition they are given power to speak.

  1. From an urban sociological perspective, to outline one aspect of what a city is. ...

    * The transformation of the built environment displaying some distinctive aesthetic features and the springing up of new local services. * The gathering together of people sharing common culture, life-style and consumer goods and services. * Economic re-ordering of property values through increased private ownership and a decline in rental and social housing.

  2. This essay proposes to discuss different accounts of the welfare state by both mainstream ...

    The results found from a sample of forty- four married couple households caring for an elderly dependent relative, that the wives spent on average between two and three hours a day undertaking essential care for the relative, irrespective of whether the wives were in paid employment or not and the husbands spent eight minutes.

  1. The cannabis debate

    This theory is what is currently in debate. Many people are now fighting to get the laws changed because they believe legalising cannabis will achieve the greatest good. Those that believe cannabis should be kept illegal to achieve the greatest good are fighting against the laws being changed.

  2. Compare and contrast Karl Marx's and Michel Foucault's analysis of the concept power.

    This is in contrast to Marx''s telogical theory of history. Power was not a thing that was held, or be seized up on, by groups or individuals. It belonged to no-one. In the time of 'The Divine Rule of Kings' power did flow from the top down because the monarch

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Perhaps, also, we can find out why those rational conclusions have not been drawn. Typology of Asceticism and Mysticism Two contrasting abnegations of the world: 1) active asceticism that is a God-willed ACTION of the devout who are God's tools.

  2. The development of Spartan society.

    are poor, they were easily and successfully bribed.'13 Perhaps, Xenophon best succinctly summarizes the role of the king within Spartan society, he is a 'priest in the divine sphere and a general in the human one.'14 Spartan political structure is further reflected here as the kings lack their conventional 'complete' power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work