• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What role does the original position play is Rawl's defence of his two principles of justice in "A theory of Justice"?

Extracts from this document...


What role does the original position play is Rawl's defence of his two principles of justice? In "A Theory of Justice" John Rawls puts forwards a social contract based upon two principles of justice, the idea of "Original Position" is a key feature in understanding and justifying these principles which attempt to be the groundwork for a society operating with the concept of 'Justice as fairness". Rawls uses the 'original position' to help people arrive at the basic principles which should govern any society. He suggests that people should imagine themselves without any government and rationally deduce what kind of a government would be supported by his social contract and therefore achieve a just society in which every citizen is treated fairly. Since he acknowledges that we are essentially self-interested, original position requires us to assume a 'veil of ignorance'. This means we should suppose we are ignorant to factors such as sex, race, generation, social class and any disabilities, so therefore effectively cease to know who we are and where we stand in the world. ...read more.


This principle can be defended by the original position since no person who is ignorant of their position in society would decree that there should be restrictions on who is allowed to vote or encourage tight censorship laws applicable to only certain groups of people. This follows because each person would fear that they themselves would fall into a category which is restricted, Rawls refers to this idea as "The Maximin Rule" and assumes that every person is going to choose the least bad alternative in order to minimise their own discomfort in the event that they fall into a particular category with in society. Applied to political freedom this means no person would say women cannot vote or working classes cannot vote because according to Rawls they should assume not to know if they themselves are a woman or a working class citizen. The second principle of justice or "Difference Principle" put forwards by Rawls refers to inequalities in society. He was aware the inequalities are inevitable in any society but he put forwards guidelines under which they could be deemed acceptable. ...read more.


Norman Daniels explains that "The original positions is well designed to enforce the abstract right to equal concern and respect." 2 It is this, he adds, which is "The fundamental concept of Rawl's deep theory." It seems that Rawls uses the original position to help his discussion and it greatly strengthens his argument since it allows him to demonstrate how he arrives at his two principles of justice. By removing morally irrelevant features and placing them behind a veil of ignorance it becomes clear that justice can be called fair. It can be applied to examples which illustrate the effectiveness of a society based on his principles and make it clearer and easier for his readers to understand. The society which Rawls arrives at seems to be a just, egalitarian one in which equal rights are given. Through his use of original position Rawls provides guidelines for what it is for a society to operate in a just manner. 1 "A Theory Of Justice" John Rawls (Harvard University press 1999) 2 "Critical study on Rawls' 'A Theory of Justice' by Norman Daniels (Stanford University Press 1989) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Meanings - Unstructured interviews to try to gain elicit meanings. * Control over when they work * Control over who they do business with * Punters come back to them, therefore good at their job * Kept some marriages together b/c husband has his sexual needs fulfilled * Almost a

  2. The position of widows in Nepalese society - sociological study.

    But discrimination against widows in this context is severe. Another aspect of widowhood relates to refugees, 80 per cent of whom are women and children. A high proportion of these women are widows, or women who do not know for certain whether their husbands are dead or alive.

  1. Compare Rawl's Theory of Justice with those of Nozick and Walzer. How may ...

    The state regulates goods distribution, professions, and society's protection and so on. As long as the state benefits all members through their policies then justice is reached. If members are treated unequal and our conditions are worsened then society is not justified.

  2. Do a detailed critical analysis of the opening of Coetzee's Foe, paying particular attention ...

    This is put in by Coetzee to question the role of women in Defoe's novel. There is no place for women in Robinson Crusoe and Coetzee provides us with an idea of what Crusoe would have been like with a woman on the island.

  1. Evaluate Mill's liberty principle. What does Mill mean by liberty? What other principles are ...

    the person may steal to fund their habit. Another problem with the HP is the question of what counts as harm. It is obvious that physical abuse should be restricted, and acts such as fraud, deception and robbery. But what about emotional and psychological abuse?

  2. Rawls claims that ‘utilitarianism does not take the distinction between persons seriously.’ Explain this ...

    These inequalities would benefit everyone for example by taxation to enable a welfare state and such like. Rawls claims that utilitarianism does not take the distinction between persons sufficiently seriously because inequalities would not be rectified such as with the difference principle, instead they would be encouraged if they contributed to maximising the overall utility of the society.

  1. John Rawls in his book "Political Liberalism" lays out a political system that answers ...

    You are then told that you will be placed back into the world without any knowledge of where you will end up. Now behind the veil of ignorance you must setup a system for the world not knowing where in it you will be placed.

  2. This critical assessment of the Canada's justice system it is important

    the crime, or is the high crime rate responsible for their poverty? It can be looked at from either side, firstly poverty causes many to sell drugs or somehow raise funds through illegal means. On the other hand, a life of drugs, violence and lack of education can prevent any

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work