However, Mead’s work was heavily criticised as being both subjective and invalid. Freedman (1984) claimed that many of the people interviewed told him that they provided Mead with the information she wanted to hear and other critics have challenged the validity of the translations. Both of these criticisms reduce the validity of the findings. Furthermore, subsequent studies of the primitive societies showed strong cultural similarities in levels of aggression, with men being more aggressive than women. Mead herself noted contradictions in behaviour in her field diary, suggesting that the role of culture is not as clearly defined as she first thought. Additional cultural similarities have also been found in the division of labour between men and women, with men adopting the ‘provider’ role, whilst the women adopt the primary care-giver role.
The fact that many of the differences in gender roles of men and women have been found to be similar, or universal, across cultures, suggests that biology must be a key influencing factor in the development of gender, supporting the view that nature is the dominant force behind gender role development. However, if this were the only factor involved, then we should not expect to see cultural differences in the gender role behaviour of men and women. The fact that we do highlights the extremely complex interaction of both nature and nurture in gender role development.
As a result of the vast cultural similarities in some aspects of gender role behaviour yet the existence of cultural differences in other gender role behaviour, Mead later changed her view to one of ‘cultural relativism’. This line of reasoning proposes that some aspects of gender, such as differing levels of aggression in males and females, may have a biological basis, but are then perpetuated by the society that they live in. Thus, the manner in which this aggression is expressed may differ, but the fact that men are more aggressive than women may be biologically determined. This bio-social approach has since been the preferred explanation by many as it can account for both cultural differences and similarities.
477 words