• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18

Human Resource Management

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

4/3/2007 Performance Appraisal A report on Bakersfield University Staff Appraisal schemes problem Acknowledgments "We would like to thank my professor, Mr. Robert Graham, for the valuable advice and support he has given me in the writing of this report. We would also like to thank our team members, for their encouragement, guidance and hard-work in making this report. Our deepest thanks go to our family, for their love, understanding and support." Summary / Abstract This study was to highlight the importance of performance appraisal and relate its significance to the case study. It was requested by Robert Graham It was requested on 4th March 2007 The investigation was done by The main findings were that the staff members were not happy with the current situation in the university and the new appraisal scheme received mixed reactions It was concluded that the Bakersfield did not implement Performance Appraisal system properly The recommendations are that the university should improve its Performance Appraisal scheme Contents Page 1. Introduction.......................................................................1 2. Literature Review..............................................................2 3. Methodology......................................................................11 4. Findings.............................................................................12 5. Conclusions.......................................................................13 6. Recommendations............................................................14 7. Bibliography......................................................................18 Introduction Background This report has been written because it was requested by our professor to have an analytical view Performance Appraisal schemes It was requested by Robert Graham It was requested on 4th March 2007 Objectives The objectives of this report are to highlight the importance of performance appraisal and relate its significance to the case study. Literature Review Performance appraisal is a regular, formalized and recorded view of the way in which an individual is performing in a particular job. ...read more.

Middle

Typically, the goals are established at the beginning of the appraisal period and measured at the end of the appraisal period. 4. Essay Method - In the essay method approach, the appraiser prepares a written statement about the employee being appraised. The statement usually concentrates on describing specific strengths and weaknesses in job performance. It also suggests courses of action to remedy the identified problem areas. The statement may be written and edited by the appraiser alone, or it be composed in collaboration with the appraise. This report has been written because it was requested by our professor to have an analytical view Performance Appraisal schemes Methodology Findings The theory aspect of Performance appraisal helped us understanding the case very well. It help us to get an inside view of various problem related to Performance Appraisal methods used by the university. The university was in the dilemma of decreasing number of lectures. University tried to overcome these problems by limiting the early retirement, exhorting them to complete their PhD's. The staff members were under a lot of pressure. In the end university as a whole decided to put two major schemes into place relating to performance appraisal; one was staff appraisal scheme and the other was an individual performance-related pay scheme. But the response to this change was mixed. Some were very positive to these changes & some were totally against it. There were disparate reactions to the individual performance pay scheme. Some were pleased that at last there was potential monitory recognition for the extra effort they put. There was no coordination or communication between the managers regarding the application of the scheme. ...read more.

Conclusion

If you have identified competencies or have comprehensive job descriptions, give people feedback on their performance of the expected competencies and job duties. The system will fail if it is an add-on rather than a supporter of your organization's fundamental direction and requirements. It must function as a measure of your accomplishment of your organization's big and long term picture. * Insufficient Information: Since 360 degree feedback processes are currently usually anonymous, people receiving feedback have no recourse if they want to further understand the feedback. They have no one to ask for clarification of unclear comments or more information about particular ratings and their basis. For this reason and for the points listed in the several bullet points following this one, developing 360 process coaches is important. * Focus on Negatives and Weaknesses: At least one book, First Break All the Rules: What The World's Greatest Managers Do Differently, advises that great managers focus on employee strengths, not weaknesses. The authors said, "People don't change that much. Don't waste time trying to put in what was left out. Try to draw out what was left in. That is hard enough." * Rater Inexperience and Ineffectiveness: In addition to the insufficient training organizations provide both people receiving feedback and people providing feedback, there are numerous ways raters go wrong. They may inflate ratings to make an employee look good. They may deflate ratings to make an individual look bad. They may informally band together to make the system artificially inflate everyone's performance. Checks and balances must prevent these pitfalls. * Paperwork/Computer Data Entry Overload Traditional evaluations required two people and one form. Multirater feedback ups the sheer number of people participating in the process and the consequent organization time invested. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Business Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Business Studies essays

  1. HRM - how Marks and Spencer motivate their staff.

    Sally Humpage, employment policy manager for M&S, said changing the guidelines suited the retailer, where half of its 60,000 in-store workforce is over the age of 40. "We treat our older workers like anyone else," she told delegates at the 'Age at Work' conference, hosted by the Employers Forum on Age in London last week.

  2. Business plan for Laundry Toaster laundry dryer.

    However, the size and scope of operation of some of the larger manufacturers active in the wardrobe furniture market means that there is likely to be an element of this activity in the medium to longer term. New products developed for new markets within the wardrobe furniture industry are forecast

  1. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of two different types of organizational structure.

    specialized skills (Mintzberg, 1993), an example of which is shown in Appendix 1. On the contrary, matrix structure, usually defined as a combination of product based structure and functional structure, has dual chain of authority (Moorhead & Griffin, 1995). Each member can belong to two divisions and may have two

  2. Ford Company Analysis - corporate structure and financial analysis

    = 5.29% Bond rating = BB+ Default spread = 3.75% Treasury bond rate = 1.62% Market cost of debt (rd) = 5.37% Average default rate for BB = 2.1% (in recession 8%) Average ?d by rating = 0.17 Weights of debt and equity: Debt: Long term debt + Short term

  1. Case Study of Reach Out, a business providing therapy to children with autism.

    They are less enthusiastic about achieving the organizational objectives. All these occurrences point towards the prevalence of the Power Culture, put forward by Charles Handy. According to this culture a group, Laura and Neil possess decision-making power. This type of culture is commonly observed in small organizations.

  2. Employment Discrimination- An Introduction

    Discrimination in the workplace stems naturally from this broad aspect of discrimination in general. The fight against discrimination in various forms in India started largely in 1950, when India achieved independence and strove to create a constitution which would hold equally in the eyes of society and law huge numbers

  1. Human Resource Management. HR management is especially critical to the core competencies of ...

    The HR Major Functions HR management typically entails the following highly interrelated functions: Job analysis and design involves systematically gathering information on the job (job description), determining the knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to perform the job competently (job specification), and designing a job that can be performed efficiently and competently by a qualified employee.

  2. Questions on Globalisation and International Trade

    the society and persons involved, both attitudes that may be derived from underlying religious beliefs. Likewise, hard work may be either rewarded positively or viewed as something of secondary importance to spiritual peace and harmony. Thirdly, different dominant religions may affect the overall competitiveness and potential for economic growth of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work