• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Experimental Molar Enthalpy of Neutralization for Sodium Hydroxide Solution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Yundi Wang October 22, 2012 Molar Enthalpy of Neutralization ________________ 1. For information regarding the problem, prediction, materials and procedure, please see attached Measurements Table for Molar Enthalpy of Neutralization for Sodium Hydroxide Solution Substance Instrument Used Measurement Sodium hydroxide 100mL graduated cylinder (±0.2mL) 50.0mL Sulfuric acid 100mL graduated cylinder (±0.2mL) 30.0mL Temperature of sodium hydroxide solution Thermometer (±0.2ËC) 26.0ËC Temperature of the sulfuric acid Thermometer (±0.2ËC) 24.0ËC Final temperature reached by solution Thermometer (±0.2ËC) 34.5ËC Initial and Final Temperatures of Solutions Temperature of sodium hydroxide solution (±0.2ËC) 26.0ËC Temperature of the sulfuric acid (±0.2ËC) 24.0ËC Final temperature reached by solution (±0.2ËC) 34.5ËC Neutralization Reaction Taking Place Pre-Lab Calculations – Volume of Sulfuric Acid Needed Average Initial Temperature of Solutions Calculation Experimental Molar Enthalpy of Neutralization for Sodium Hydroxide Solution Calculation Solution 1. The experimental molar enthalpy of neutralization for sodium hydroxide solution was found to be -64±3.3KJ/mol. Calculation of Uncertainties 34.5±0.2ËC – 25.0±0.2ËC =9.5±0.2ËC 50±0.2mL + 30±0.2mL =80±0.2mL 9.5 ± 0.4ËC = 4.210…% 80 ± 0.4mL = 0.5% 50 ± 0.2mL = 0.4% =5.11…% =5.1% Percent Difference Conclusion Through a pre-lab calculation the amount of sulfuric acid solution needed was found to be 30.0m±0.2mL. ...read more.

Middle

In saying that, it is possible within this lab the reactants were concentrated in one area causing the experimental change in enthalpy to be quite large. Because it is impossible to see into the calorimeter to see if the reaction is concentrated or when the reaction is complete the reactants could easily have been concentrated in one area. Furthermore, by not knowing when the reaction is complete, the temperature might be measured too soon or too late causing inaccurate results. In general, because the calorimeter is an isolated environment it results in the experiment having many errors because how the reaction is occurring and when the reaction is finished is unknown. A way to eliminate this error is by inserting an electronic stirring rod to stir the reactants so they do not become concentrated in one area. Furthermore, another reason contributing to the large enthalpy change is the impurity of the substances used. As a result, because the substances are impure, they could have had a higher concentration of reactants. With a higher concentration of reactants, the reaction rate will increase and there will be a greater reaction than wanted. With a larger reaction at an increased rate, the final temperature of the solutions will spike higher than wanted generating a larger enthalpy change. ...read more.

Conclusion

A hole is needed to be made to insert the thermometer. And there were many holes between the lid of the calorimeter and the calorimeter itself. Due to this ineffectiveness of the Styrofoam calorimeter, some of the heat from the reaction would have escaped through the many holes causing a lower final temperature of the reaction and the experimental enthalpy change to be lower than the theoretical (actual) value. As a result, the experimental value is usually lower than the theoretical (actual) value. Another reason includes the fact that some of the heat released during the reaction would have been transferred to the calorimeter itself instead of transferring to the thermometer. As a result, when the calorimeter and/or glass of the thermometer absorb the heat, it causes the thermometer to absorb less heat than it should. The final temperature will then be lower than it should be causing a lower enthalpy change. Even though this is not a main reason why the experimental molar enthalpy should be lower than the actual molar enthalpy it still contributes to it. As a result, with the combination of these factors the experimental enthalpy change should be lower than the theoretical value because a lot of heat is able to escape into the calorimeter and into the air due to there being holes in the calorimeter. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Investigate the rate of reaction of luminol in various factors. The objective was to ...

    Store In a dark bottle in a cool place. Take care when removing the cap as pressure may have built up. 100'vol' hydrogen peroxide should be kept with other corrosive liquids, non-acid and should only be diluted immediately before use (as the inhibitor, which slows down decomposition, is diluted as well).

  2. A comparison of various proprieary antacids

    a thorough model of how the antacid really prevents stomach acidity in the stomach, and the time needed for it to take complete effect. In this respect some of the antacids have acted completely where as other may be in need of other stimuli to complete their full action. 7.

  1. IB IA: Determination of Heat of Neutralization

    Therefore, 0.05 moles of H2SO4 reacts with 0.1 moles of KOH and gives 0.1 moles of water. Therefore, heat of neutralization = 5.225 � 0.1 = -52.25kJmol-1 = -52.3kJmol-1 (3 s.f.) Evaluation: 1. Standard enthalpy change of neutralization, ?Hf?, is the energy evolved when 1 mole of water is formed

  2. The Enthalpy of Neutralization

    for Trial 1 Temperature (�C) for Trial 2 25cm3 of 2.00mol�dm-3 H2SO4 21 � 0.5 20.5 � 0.5 25cm3 of 4.00mol�dm-3NaOH 21 � 0.5 20.5 � 0.5 Mixture of H2SO4 and NaOH 35 � 0.5 34.5 � 0.5 Change in temperature (?T)

  1. Determining an enthalpy change of reaction

    Sample calculations: 22.5 + 22.5 + 22.5 = 67.5 67.5 / 3 = 22.5?C Time/s 0 30 60 90 120 150 180* 210 240 Temperature/?C 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.6 22.6 22.6 26 31 31.8 Time/s 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 ?

  2. Enthalpy Change Design Lab (6/6)How does changing the initial temperature (19C, 25C, 35C, and ...

    For example, if 10�C was selected as a variation, and the temperature change caused by the neutralization reaction of 1.00 mol dm-3 KOH(aq) and HCl(aq) was actually an increase of 9�C, and the room temperature was 23�C, it would be difficult to accurately discern the maximum temperature from the data

  1. The aim of this experiment is to examine the enthalpy of combustion of the ...

    92.5 91.0 150 85.5 88.0 90.0 88.0 165 85.0 87.5 89.5 87.0 180 83.5 87.0 87.0 86.0 210 83.0 86.5 86.5 85.0 Lot of soot was formed on the boiling tube.The color of the flame was light orange .Incomplete transmission of heat is assumed due to the movements caused in the laboratory, which affected the flame and therefore the transmission.

  2. To determine the standard enthalpy of formation of Magnesium Oxide using Hess Law.

    Once 120 seconds were up, the calorimeter was emptied and cleaned so that another trial of the same experiment could be performed. Part Y ? With Magnesium Oxide Powder 1. The calorimeter was cleaned thoroughly ensuring no chemicals were left behind which would hinder in the reaction in part Y.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work