• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hydration Lab

Extracts from this document...


Hydration Lab (no design) Malcolm McCulloch Purpose The purpose of this lab is to determine the water of hydration of a compound (CuSO4) by heating it and hence find its chemical formula. Data Table Table 1 Data collected during experiment (a few very simple calculations made: [d],[h],[i] ) [a] Compound selected for analysis CuSO4 [b] Mass of crucible and cover (g) 16.7 � 0.1 [c] Mass of crucible and cover, and hydrated sample (g) 18.1 � 0.1 [d] Mass of hydrated sample [c] - [b] = 1.4 � 0.2 [e] Mass of crucible and cover, and dehydrated sample - 1st weighing (g) 17.70 � 0.01 [f] Mass of crucible and cover, and dehydrated sample - 2nd weighing (g) 17.67 � 0.01 [g] Mass of crucible and cover, and dehydrated sample - 3rd weighing (g) 17.66 � 0.01 Mass of crucible and cover, and dehydrated sample - 4th weighing (g) n/a [h] Mass of dehydrated sample (g) [g] - [b] = 0.96* � 0.11 [i] Mass of water evolved (g) ...read more.


However, the literature value was 5 moles of oxygen for every 1 mole of CuSO4 (Copper [II] Sulfate Pentahydrate - CuSO4 � 5H2O). As calculated above in Data Processing, this means that the percentage deviation from the literature value was 20%. This is significantly less than the percentage uncertainty, which was 37%. This should indicate that the random error was higher than systematic error, because while there was a high level of uncertainty, the literature value still falls within that value, meaning that the measurements were close enough. In reality, though, this high level of uncertainty says more about the inaccuracy of the measuring equipment than it does about the amount of systematic error. For example, it is possible that simply not all of the water was removed from the compound. On the contrary, the lab procedure instructed to continue trials of heating the compound and weighing it until the mass values were within 0.05g of each other. Those in this lab were only 0.01g apart - a difference which would not have affected the outcome of the lab. ...read more.


Improving the Investigation This lab did not meet its goal, hence definitely should be improved. The simplest change that could be made is to use the more precise scale from the beginning of the experiment. This would reduce the percentage error down to 6.7%, a much more reasonable value. This, however, does not solve the problem of the inaccurate value determined, because it is unlikely that this scale would have been any more accurate, despite being more precise. It is hard to pinpoint, therefore, exactly where the experiment went wrong, as it seems that the scales were not at fault but that a sufficient amount of water had been removed. There was certainly some kind of systematic error. One way that this error might be reduced, even without understanding its source, is to increase the amount of substance measured. Because the lab is about obtaining a ratio, this would not affect the result at all except hopefully to decrease the effect of any systematic error. This would, however, have the disadvantage of making the lab take longer, and steps might need to be added to ensure that all of the compound has a chance to dehydrate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Energetics Design Lab

    This limitation cannot be fully avoided but can be easily improved. Realistic improvements to this limitation include: * Doing the reaction straight in a Styrofoam cup and not in the copper cup which was placed in the Styrofoam cup. Due to the fact that copper is an extremely bad insulator,

  2. Chemistry Equilibrium Lab

    radius of the straws that keep the amount of water the straw can hold due to air pressure the same. The environment where the experiment is held in also controls the relative volumes of water because of the evaporation of water due to the temperature and the air pressure.

  1. Titration Lab

    Method For Data Collection 1. I have weighed out exactly 2.5 grams of AR ammonium iron (II) sulphate crystals, and dissolved them in approximately 40cm� of sulphuric acid solution with a concentration of approximately 1 mol dm-�. 2. I did NOT heat the solution to assist the dissolving of the solution.

  2. Change of Potential Difference in Voltaic Cells Lab Report

    The most diluted concentration of copper sulfate (0.2 M) shows the lowest potential difference (voltage) between the two half-cells. In contrast, the most concentrated copper sulfate solution (1.0 m) shows the highest potential difference between the two-half cells. However, potential difference remained constant (0.83 V)

  1. Popcorn Lab

    of water n= 0.31g 18.01g/mol =0.0172 mol Percent water in kernel Mass of water lost x 100 Mass of 16 kernels 0.31g/2.34g x 100% = 13.25% Pressure of steam inside kernel at time of pop PV= nRT P=nRT V = (0.0172) (0.0821L x atm x mol-1 x K-1) ( 273+225)

  2. Group 4

    The maximum of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution shows the intermediate speed at which the largest number of molecules are traveling. As the temperature increases, the number of molecules that are traveling at high speeds increases, and the speeds become more evenly distributed in the curves.

  1. Calcium Lab

    8) Clean up. Data and Observations Table 1: Quantitative Observations before Reaction #1 Mass of filter paper 1.42g Mass CaCO3 1.99g Mass beaker 104.2g Volume of HCL 40 mL Table 2: Observations During Reaction #1 Quantitative Qualitative CaCO3 --> white powder HCL --> transparent fluid 0:01 seconds -Immediate sizzling (big, white, bubbles)

  2. Organic lab. Comparison of alkanes and alkenes

    Part II ? Comparison of alkanes and alkenes 1. Reaction of the double bond Substance Hexane + dilute sulfuric acid + potassium permanganate Hexene + dilute sulfuric acid + potassium permanganate Observations When the fucsia potassium permanganate is added to the clear hexane and sulfuric acid, the whole solution turns fucsia, as one would expect.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work