• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hydration Lab

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Hydration Lab (no design) Malcolm McCulloch Purpose The purpose of this lab is to determine the water of hydration of a compound (CuSO4) by heating it and hence find its chemical formula. Data Table Table 1 Data collected during experiment (a few very simple calculations made: [d],[h],[i] ) [a] Compound selected for analysis CuSO4 [b] Mass of crucible and cover (g) 16.7 � 0.1 [c] Mass of crucible and cover, and hydrated sample (g) 18.1 � 0.1 [d] Mass of hydrated sample [c] - [b] = 1.4 � 0.2 [e] Mass of crucible and cover, and dehydrated sample - 1st weighing (g) 17.70 � 0.01 [f] Mass of crucible and cover, and dehydrated sample - 2nd weighing (g) 17.67 � 0.01 [g] Mass of crucible and cover, and dehydrated sample - 3rd weighing (g) 17.66 � 0.01 Mass of crucible and cover, and dehydrated sample - 4th weighing (g) n/a [h] Mass of dehydrated sample (g) [g] - [b] = 0.96* � 0.11 [i] Mass of water evolved (g) ...read more.

Middle

However, the literature value was 5 moles of oxygen for every 1 mole of CuSO4 (Copper [II] Sulfate Pentahydrate - CuSO4 � 5H2O). As calculated above in Data Processing, this means that the percentage deviation from the literature value was 20%. This is significantly less than the percentage uncertainty, which was 37%. This should indicate that the random error was higher than systematic error, because while there was a high level of uncertainty, the literature value still falls within that value, meaning that the measurements were close enough. In reality, though, this high level of uncertainty says more about the inaccuracy of the measuring equipment than it does about the amount of systematic error. For example, it is possible that simply not all of the water was removed from the compound. On the contrary, the lab procedure instructed to continue trials of heating the compound and weighing it until the mass values were within 0.05g of each other. Those in this lab were only 0.01g apart - a difference which would not have affected the outcome of the lab. ...read more.

Conclusion

Improving the Investigation This lab did not meet its goal, hence definitely should be improved. The simplest change that could be made is to use the more precise scale from the beginning of the experiment. This would reduce the percentage error down to 6.7%, a much more reasonable value. This, however, does not solve the problem of the inaccurate value determined, because it is unlikely that this scale would have been any more accurate, despite being more precise. It is hard to pinpoint, therefore, exactly where the experiment went wrong, as it seems that the scales were not at fault but that a sufficient amount of water had been removed. There was certainly some kind of systematic error. One way that this error might be reduced, even without understanding its source, is to increase the amount of substance measured. Because the lab is about obtaining a ratio, this would not affect the result at all except hopefully to decrease the effect of any systematic error. This would, however, have the disadvantage of making the lab take longer, and steps might need to be added to ensure that all of the compound has a chance to dehydrate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Chemistry essays

  1. Change of Potential Difference in Voltaic Cells Lab Report

    Two half-cells were used in the experiment; copper sulfate and zinc sulfate. This is a redox reaction, reduction is: Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- --> Cu (s) and the oxidation is: Zn (s) --> Zn2+ + 2e- . The sum of the redox reaction for the experiment is: Cu2+ (aq)

  2. Titration Lab

    I have mixed the solution 5. In order to control the temperature of the liquids, I have used the same room at the same time. I did not used any air conditioning to change the temperature. Method For Data Collection 1.

  1. Chemistry Equilibrium Lab

    The point where the two lines meet for both the same and different radius experiments means that the volumes at those points are equal. The first flat portion on the same radius straw graph is when the volumes and rates are equal and that equilibrium is reached with 10mL of water.

  2. Energetics Design Lab

    %unc(T) = 7.78% M(acid) = (0.005/1.00) = 0.50% V(acid) = (2/50) = 4.00% Moles(acid) = 4.50% Delta H (neutralization) = 12.3% Total: 36.8% Qualitative Results: * The reaction immediately started as soon as the sodium carbonate was dropped into any of the acids; however, specifically for the sulfuric acid there was a much louder fizzing noise and the temperature increased much faster.

  1. Popcorn Lab

    of water n= 0.31g 18.01g/mol =0.0172 mol Percent water in kernel Mass of water lost x 100 Mass of 16 kernels 0.31g/2.34g x 100% = 13.25% Pressure of steam inside kernel at time of pop PV= nRT P=nRT V = (0.0172) (0.0821L x atm x mol-1 x K-1) ( 273+225)

  2. chem design lab 2

    Using the stopwatch, start the time for 3 minutes and blow out the candle after 3 minutes has passed 22. After you have blown out the candle, record the new temperature of the water under the 3 minutes trial. 23.

  1. Calcium Lab

    8) Clean up. Data and Observations Table 1: Quantitative Observations before Reaction #1 Mass of filter paper 1.42g Mass CaCO3 1.99g Mass beaker 104.2g Volume of HCL 40 mL Table 2: Observations During Reaction #1 Quantitative Qualitative CaCO3 --> white powder HCL --> transparent fluid 0:01 seconds -Immediate sizzling (big, white, bubbles)

  2. Organic lab. Comparison of alkanes and alkenes

    This is the soot collecting on the basin. Therefore, a incomplete combustion occurred, in which the bi products of CO and carbon were released. Indeed, the soot is the amount of carbon produced by the combustion. When the lighted splint is applied to the basin full of hexene, the whole surface of the alcohol catches fire (combusts)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work