• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Much of Lenins success was no doubt explained by his towering domination over his [Bolshevik] party. To what extent does this explanation account for his rise to power and rule, 1917 to 1924?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Much of Lenin's success was no doubt explained by his towering domination over his [Bolshevik] party." To what extent does this explanation account for his rise to power and rule, 1917 to 1924? Though some western interpretations have been that Russia was unprepared for the drastic changes that Lenin desired, the transition to a socialist government was successful, and Lenin was the one leading. He was the most prominent figure within the Bolshevik party, but it can be argued that his domination over the party was the cause of his continued success. He did introduce the policy of 'kick-starting' a proletarian revolution, but the Bolsheviks were not a one-man party. Up until the arrival of Lenin, they had published books explaining Marx's theory within the Russian context, and they had already help form a Soviet that was not directly associated with the Provisional Government that replaced the Tsar after his abdication on March 15, 1917. Lenin did have a strong influence over the Bolshevik Party with his ideology, political strategies, and willingness to compromise, but there were other men who helped lead to his successful rise to power and its maintenance. Upon his arrival to Russia through Germany, Lenin knew that 1917 was a year for change as the Tsarist government had been overthrown, and its replacement was failing to relieve the people. ...read more.

Middle

Later, he created a variety of short slogans like "Peace, bread, land" which were of much more success amongst the peasants and uneducated. The slogans were based on the main demands of the time: an end to Russian participation in the war, an end to food scarcity, and an end to the land question. Lenin's book was addressed mainly to the intellectuals as Lenin was aware of who would and who would not read it. Trotsky said that even if the people did not read Lenin and his books, he had already read them, meaning that the slogans had been created for the purpose of circulating the Communist ideology amongst those who would not read the book. So far, all the successes have been his own. After the October/November revolution in 1917 and the Bolshevik rise to power, Lenin needed a way to preserve the control and power, and this was done through a reign of terror. Thus, other Bolsheviks appeared, and two divisions were created within the defense: the CHEKA and the Red Army, neither of which was under the direct control of Lenin. The CHEKA had its own Chief of Police, and the Red Army was under Trotsky's control and leadership. The soldiers of the Red Army had also been trained by Tsarist generals, whose families' lives had been threatened, because of their experience and capabilities, but this took place under the supervision of Bolsheviks. ...read more.

Conclusion

These compromises may have provoked criticism, but Lenin's priority was retaining the support of the peasantry and proletariat which needed food and money. He kept the main industries like coal, iron, and fuel centralized, but he allowed some liberties. Even if the CHEKA and the Red Army had intervened to resist the German and Poles and to persist the continuation of War Communism, the Bolsheviks would have lost their power to either the Germans, the Poles, or revolutionaries. They would have followed the Tsar into insignificance. In the case of the treaties and the NEP, Lenin played a huge role. It can be assumed that Lenin had played an impressive role in his success because his name continues through the pages of history. His intelligence and composure were so contagious to surrounding Bolsheviks and Russians that they provoked E.H. Carr into saying that the Bolshevik success resulted from Lenin imposition of his personality upon the party and its decisions. He was a predominant feat of the Bolshevik Party, serving as the 'mouthpiece' for publicity, as well as the one finding new means of regulating control over the people. His dependence upon other Bolshevik individuals, especially Trotsky, mars any possible argument of his domination of the party caused his success as, without the Bolsheviks and their support, Lenin would have lost his influence over Petrograd and Russia. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do Trotsky(TM)s own misjudgments account for his failure in the power struggle ...

    4 star(s)

    Trotsky's biographer, I. Deutscher mentions in his writings, "The truth is that Trotsky refrained from attacking Stalin because he felt secure." However a reasonable explanation could be that Trotsky was extremely loyal to both the party and to Lenin that he did not take a hard-line position in fear of creating splits in the party.

  2. Compare and Contrast the rise to power of Hitler and Lenin

    Lenin overcame the setback of the July days and Hitler that of the Munich putsch. Lenin outmanoeuvred the ambitious General Kornilov, and Hitler the ambitious General von Schleicher. Kerensky was on drugs and Hindenburg was on his last legs. When Lenin took his tram ride to the Kremlin there was

  1. French Revolution: Success or Failure?

    Under this document, the French citizens are equal and they should have same privilege without any discrimination such as social background. Truly, through this article, the French people were guaranteed the rights of freedom, liberty and security. Due to the lack of organization of King Louis XVI, the French people had to fight with poverty.

  2. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    - Lousi XVI travelled to Paris and he publically donned a cockade (przywdzial kokarde). Cockade became a symbol of the Revolution. It was a combination of colors: white for the Bourbons, blue and red for the city of Paris. These 3 colors became the national flag.

  1. Castro's rise to power

    What is more, Batista's regime continued being politically dependant on the USA because the Americans saw him as an ally against communism. For Batista and the USA it was a win-win situation. The USA kept Cuba under control and Batista's economic interests were fulfilled; but what about Cuban people?

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Lenin and Trotsky to the establishment and consolidation ...

    Although not as good orator as Lenin, but Trotsky managed to organize the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, which was a peace treaty signed on March 3, 1918 announcing the withdrawal of Russia from World War One. Trotsky, tired with continuous demands for cessions of territory on behalf of Germany, withdrew from negotiations.

  1. Comparison between Trotsky's and Lenin's role in the establishment of the USSR

    Lenin couldn't set up the immediate measures necessary for a Bolshevik revolution such as a suitable militia, because he was exiled and could only enter Russia shortly before the Revolution. So in general it is fair to argue that Trotsky did the immediate organisational work, leading to the revolution, although

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Aimed to achieve a perfect society based on the peasant and village commune. 3. 1873-1874 2-3000 Populists from the nobility and intelligentsia ?went to the people? to share in the true life of the peasant and educate them to rise up in rebellion against the Tsar and form a Populist state.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work