• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

League of Nations

Extracts from this document...


History assignment for week 37 Questions, page 53, chapter 3: The League of Nations. 1 (a) Using the information in this chapter, make two lists: (i) ways in which the League of Nations can be said to have helped progress in international relations; (ii) ways in which the League of Nations did not help progress in international relations; * By establishing the International Labour Organisation (ILO) which had the purpose to improve conditions of labour and it succeeded. * By establishing the Health Organisation which investigated the causes of epidemics, and successfully combating a typhus epidemic in Russia, which was threatening Europe. * By establishing the Mandates Commission whom supervised the government of territories taken from Germany and Turkey. * (By establishing the Refugee Organisation which took care of the former prisoners of war stranded in Russia at the end of the war and after 1933 they gave help to the people fleeing from the Nazi persecution in Germany.) * The League of Nations decision-making concerning the quarrel between Finland and Sweden, the rival claims of Germany and Poland, when the Greeks invaded Bulgaria, when the Turkey claimed the province of Mosul and the squabbles that were settled between Peru and Columbia, and between Bolivia and Paraguay. * All the organisations provided an increase inside welfare, but not as much inside international relations. * None of the listed disputes in row one was threatening to world peace and none of these went against a major state. * The League was twice overruled by the Conference of Ambassadors which showed its weaknesses. ...read more.


(d)Which do you think were the two most important causes of this failure? Explain your answers fully. In my opinion the one the two most important causes of the failure of the League is that it from start lacked many of the major nations such as Germany, The US and the USSR because it made the work of the League rather unbalanced, to provide a peacekeeping environment the League would need as many nations as possible, and also the fact that Britain and France tried to make Italy an ally against Germany all though Italy actually to some extend defied the League and ended up joining Hitler instead of being the ally of Britain and Germany. And beside this I believe that another one of the two most important causes of the failure of the League is that the will-power of the League started to decrease through the years, especially after the world economic crisis which made all the of the previous failures made by the League come into the surface, like the weaknesses in the Covenant, the lacking of the US which could have been a support financially especially in this period. So the leading powers in the League showed how strong the League itself were, and since both Britain and France had serous economic problems it led to a major decrease in will-power, actually you can turn this around and say that the economic crisis affected the will-power and therefore the exposed the League's weaknesses, and the world economic crisis also led to extreme right-wing governments in Japan and Germany, ...read more.


Both source D and E are speeches, but E manages to explain why the League failed to preserve peace better than D, since E is a comparison of two speeches by Churchill with a difference of two years, 1933-1935, and how the situations according to Churchill might could have been dealt by the League, but by saying that E is better than D doesn't necessarily mean that source E is explaining clearly why the League failed to preserve peace, because it doesn't to extend since it shows how the Conservative Britain dealt with the League and not how the League functioned. To return to source E which is an speech by the British Foreign Secretary Sir Samuel Hoare to the League at Geneva in 1935, and Hoare point out the British support for the League and the fact that the League is under a massive pressure because of the Abyssinia crises, which was one of the main failures of the League, but it doesn't explain as such. Source F is both lacking origin, since it is from a book by Harry Hansen without year, and value, because source F is rather subjective especially in the last line where it says:" If a nation can sit in sackcloth and ashes, the United States should do so for its selfish rejection of the League.". And the purpose of the source is to show how selfish the Americans were when they rejected the League, but that is also one of the explanations why the League failed to preserve peace but the limitations of the source comes in the way of the explaining. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Free essay

    May the League of Nations be considered a complete failure? Answer this question and ...

    At the same time, it was obliged to defend the peace treaty even if by many it was considered unjust or exaggerated, and even if the terms of the settlement did not satisfy the promises which had been previously made to some nations, for example those on which Italy relied to gain new territory.

  2. Woodrow Wilson. The absence of the United States in the League of Nations led ...

    to 38.9 The final vote was 49 to 35 in favour but still short of the two-thirds majority required.10 Republicans supported the reservations but Democrats opposed them, there was never an agreement because each party wanted to discredit the other.11 The problem started in Article 10 of League of Nations Covenant.

  1. The League of Nations was a failure. How far do you agree with this ...

    - seemed very promising but they were not organised by the League. This undermines the League and shows that countries were perfectly able to uphold peace on their own without the interference of the League. During the Manchurian Crisis (1931-1933), the League did not make wise decisions.

  2. Collapse of the League of Nations

    After all, many British people were in support of it as they wanted peace, agreed that the Treaty of Versailles was not fear towards Germany and felt that events in Europe were not Britain's business. The policy of appeasement began as Britain and France did not stop Germany to rearm in 1933.

  1. The League of Nations - Although the League of Nations had several successes, it ...

    For them, a further involvement in European affairs meant further loss of money and army. In spite of the fact that Wilson introduced the idea, the United States was not allowed to join the League due to the U.S. Senate's refusal.

  2. Interwar Years: 1919-39

    * For example, in 1932 Britain and its imperial partners set up the Imperial Preference System which discriminated in favour of members of the Empire but discriminated against goods from outside the Empire. * World trade thus fell by around two-thirds in the period 1929-32 thus intensifying the effects of the economic crisis.

  1. Appeal to the League of Nations

    drink Ravage and Terror -Carried out barbarianism in the most densely populated areas of the country -The main point was to get the idea of fear and death across to the people -The tactics worked, as the people would go screaming at the slightest touch of the gas -Humans and

  2. Extended Essay - The Role of a UN-Secretary General to Achieve World Peace: The ...

    Right then, the US requested U Thant to make another appeal to the Soviet even though it had not agreed to his first message yet. Kennedy said to Stevenson, ?See if U Thant on his own responsibility will ask Mr.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work