• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Lenin's legacy

Extracts from this document...


The Radical Lenin & The Russian Revolution September 8, 2006 "Without a revolutionary theory there cannot be a revolutionary movement." Vladimir Lenin And indeed... a theory was how it all began, the birth of one of the most recognized events in history, the Russian Revolution. The world remembers one man, Vladimir Lenin as the man who turned Karl Marx's distant dream of a communist society into a deviant reality. Known as the pedant and architect of the revolutionary movement and the leader of the Bolshevik party, however significant Lenin's role may have been, it can be argued that Lenin did not act alone, and that other factors contributed to the events that include the October 17th coup leading up to the consolidation of the Soviet State. To Lenin, the revolution was his life. A man of remarkable political reverence, Lenin's brilliance lay within the simple expression of his concepts and strong leadership skills. He was as crafty as he was orderly, with all the qualities of a revolutionary who was ready to make radical changes- even if that meant radical tactics. In one text, historian Chris Corin sums up Lenin as a man who "had a strong streak of ruthlessness and cruelty." (Corin) Lenin possessed a fierce determination and strength of focus that at the time was deemed impossible to challenge. Lenin is also described as a man with a "hypnotic influence" that always managed to bring the party together. ...read more.


uproar at a pre-parliament meeting where Leon Trotsky, Lenin's right hand man and the "famous leader of the bandits and hooligans," accused the government and bourgeoisie of promoting the "bony hand of hunger" simply in order to prevent a revolution. Trotsky's claims that the government planned to give up the capital as a part of a conspiracy elicit an outcry. The Bolsheviks all walked out of the meeting fueled with the lust for blood and extreme hatred needed to plan the perfect takeover against the autocratic regime, starting with tactics and deception- two things that Trotsky only knew all too well. (Kreis) As Corin states, "Lenin is given a key role as the leader who directed the party and had the insight to make crucial decisions." Lenin made one such decision when he called for the revolution to be carried out, even when others opposed him. In a letter written by Zinoviev and Kamenev that was published in Novaia zhizn on 18 October 1917, the two important Bolshevik leaders speculate on the current political situation. "If we take power now and are forced into a revolutionary war; the mass of soldiers will not support us." Both leaders were echoing the fears of many of those in the party; for fear that there would be a lack of support available for their upheaval. Even Trotsky urged Lenin to wait until the Second Congress of All-Russian Soviets on 26 October as to put on the appearance that the "seizure of power was done with the support of the soviets rather than by the Bolsheviks." ...read more.


They had expected the revolution to be the first of many revolutions to sweep across the world and destroy all capitalist governments while reinstating the workers rule. Fast-forward, and we today know that was not how the story ended. There was no international revolution. In fact if anything was proven, it was that communism is not meant to be in our co-existence. The terms "economical failure" and "political repression" now stain the concept of what once was deemed to be a "dawn in human history." (Lynch) As indispensable as Lenin's actions were, when it comes to assessing his role in the revolution up to the time of the state's consolidation which almost coincide with his death, it is plausible to conclude that, although Lenin played a key role in all aspects of the movement, the causes or upheavals that occurred and inspired revolution would have happened with or without him. The drive for land and freedom that triggered revolts in the peasant population are a prime example. Another example is the mutinies that took place in response to the war. However, it is also important to note that without the Bolsheviks it is highly unlikely that a collection of workers, soldiers and peasants would succeed alone in establishing rule. If we can accredit Lenin's contribution to the party, we can also therefore recognize him for playing a major part in the revolution. Vladimir Lenin is a man to be both admired and feared for the audacious leap of faith that we now remember as an attempt to transform human society, to transform the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    * Key figures of the Thermidorans: Jean-Lambert Tallien Paul Barras Joseph Fouch´┐Ż Their political views: they were former Jacobins, but they were more moderate than the Jacobins. Tjhey opposed restoration of the monarchy and voted for the execution of the king.

  2. The influence of socialism on the development of universal human rights

    The working class was dissatisfied and wanted more, conferences were held and organizations were established, e.g. International Association for Labor Legislation, which fought for abolishing child labor and providing education and freedom for children. This worked out and in the beginning of the nineteenth century the standards were set and child labor was abolished in the most West-European factories.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Lenin and Trotsky to the establishment and consolidation ...

    In order to ensure their loyalty, Trotsky held their families hostage. Trotsky was good at organization and so when back up was needed in the war front, he traveled in a specially equipped train to the fighting site, providing support with a "special army".

  2. Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsars inadequacy as a ruler of the ...

    lured Rasputin to his palace and together with Purishkevich (a reactionary deputy in the Duma) and Grand Duke Dmitrii (the Tsar's nephew), shot him.6 This event caused Alexandra and Nicolas II to have a closer relationship which thus enables her to still control her husband (to the displeasure of the monarchs and masses).

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Effects on peasants 1. Freedom from noble interference and control as well as forced military service 2. Mir?s power was strengthened which aided local autonomy. 3. Kulaks emerged and were resented by the peasants. 4. Overall loss of land (4% in less fertile regions and 23.6% in the Black Soil)

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Arabs: - Arab hostility was further increased towards Israel, but it also marked the end of the Pan-Arab dream - Arab leaders met in Khartoum in September 1967 and passed the 'three noes resolution': no negotiation with Israel, no recognition of Israel and no peace with Israel - Arab defeat

  1. Compare and contrast the causes and nature of the February and October revolutions in ...

    Despite this, he managed to keep in contact with the remaining members of the Soviet Party. The party had mixed fortunes during the summer, with support rising and falling. The July Days were particularly bad for the party as it was seen to have lost an opportunity and it then

  2. Which of indoctrination and repression proved most effective for consolidating Hitler's power (1933-1939)?

    Some historians think that the Reichstag fire was in fact something organized by the Nazis themselves. [11] In fact it could have been possible that some SA following the orders of Karl Ernst went into the building through hidden corridors, and put fire to it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work