• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The League of Nations was unable to enforce its policies or maintain peace because of the weak alliance between powers. The US was not part of the League, some potentially strong countries, Germany and Russia, were excluded, the existing members were weak

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SECTION A The League of Nations was unable to enforce its policies or maintain peace because of the weak alliance between powers. The US was not part of the League, some potentially strong countries, Germany and Russia, were excluded, the existing members were weak, the fundamental problem of collective security and the ineffectiveness of decision-making. The first problem was that the US was not an member of the League. As shown by Source B, The President was idle, even though Wilson's Fourteen Points formed the basis of the league, represented by the bridge, and they also had a lot of economic and military power. Without the US, the League lacked power, prestige and legitimacy, as the original creator of it was no longer there. The US was also the keystone upon which the entire bridge rests, without the US, there is a "gap in the bridge", and the League was weak and incomplete. ...read more.

Middle

This meant that if a problem broke out, the League would not be able to go further than economic sanctions as it had no military power, weakening its power. The fourth problem as Source A identifies is that collective security is fundamentally problematic, as not all countries are equally invested. This meant decision-making was ineffective. Countries either disagreed on what "constituted aggression" or "over the appropriate sanction", but the League required unanimous agreement to pass a decision, paralyzing the league. And sanctions were ineffective because they were inevitably the "lowest common denominator", having limited effectiveness. The League's failure is apparent in the Abyssinia Crisis. Mussolini wanted to invade Abyssinia. The League talked to Mussolini, but he then sent an army to Africa. Mussolini ignored the League and invaded Abyssinia. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is also a specific argument against "collective security" rather than a general narrative of the event. The limitation of Source A is that it is written for students and is meant as an overview, and does not analyze the problem fully. The origin of Source B is that it is a cartoon drawn in 1919, drawn by a British cartoonist and published in Punch. The purpose of it was to be a political comment for the British public on the problem of US self-isolation. The value is that it reflects how people in Britain at that time considered the League to be ineffective partly due to lack of US involvement, and the US is also presented in a manner that suggests idleness, reflecting a negative view towards the US. Its limitation is a lack of concrete facts as it is only a visual representation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. The League of Nations - Although the League of Nations had several successes, it ...

    [6] The Treaty of Versailles was signed with Germany after World War One. The treaty was the harshest peace treaty of the war, forcing Germany to accept the guilt for the war and the Treaty restricted the German army to 100,000 troops with no submarines or airplanes.

  2. Free essay

    May the League of Nations be considered a complete failure? Answer this question and ...

    At the same time, it was obliged to defend the peace treaty even if by many it was considered unjust or exaggerated, and even if the terms of the settlement did not satisfy the promises which had been previously made to some nations, for example those on which Italy relied to gain new territory.

  1. Appeal to the League of Nations

    animals both succumbed to the deadly rain -Tens of thousands of civilians died due to the gas attacks -Nobody but Haile and his "brave companions" were brave enough to bring the "undeniable proof" to the civilized world (Europe?) -The League of nations did not listen to Haile's delegates, and therefore

  2. Nazi Germany

    - Nazi successes - many Germans tolerated the terror (any opponent killed, citizens scared to submission, ...), they appreciated the economic recovery, they felt Nazism brings needed discipline and order to Germany, and some Germans felt proud of their country again - Economic fears - many German workers were afraid

  1. Collapse of the League of Nations

    This policy seemed right for the context of the current atmosphere in Europe which was economically and socially shaken by the Great Depression and the previous war. Also with the absence of one of the world's powers the U.S. and based on the assumption that Mussolini and Hitler were reasonable politicians Chamberlin's idea of appeasement sounded as a reasonable policy.

  2. Bismarck's policies success

    Bismarck was determined, yet not successful, in eliminating all nuisances in his point of view, such as the Socialist party. To Bismarck, socialists were thieves, robbers and murderers. The Social Democratic Party in Germany became the greatest Socialist Party in Europe and the one with the most prestige.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Witte?s economic policies 1. Home industries protected from foreign competition by import duties (up to 33% on some items). Metal and Moscow textiles benefitted most while St Petersburg textile found it had to pay more for its supplied by sea.

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    - The meetings did seem to bring about a closer relationship and understanding between the two men. Arafat pledged to try and control Palestinian violence, and Netanyahu agreed to resume discussions about Hebron (their promise to deploy from it) - October 6 1996 Israeli and Palestinian negotiating teams began discussions in Hebron.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work