• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Role Played by the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences in the Origin of the Cold War

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Role Played by the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences in the Origin of the Cold War. How, and to what extent, did the conferences at Yalta and Potsdam (1945) contribute to the origin of the Cold War? During the end of the Second World War there were several conferences where the allies tried to decide how to solve the problems that would come up after the war had ended. Here the allies discussed important issues like the German and Polish question, the UN, and, what to do with Eastern Europe after the fall of Hitler. As suspected the allies differed terribly in some matters and tension grew. Two of these conferences were the ones at Yalta and Potsdam (February and July-August 1945). The Yalta conference is often regarded as a success and the allies managed to cooperate together relatively well despite their ideological differences. They decided to divide Germany into four zones of occupation but that this division would be �temporary� and Germany would be run as one country. ...read more.

Middle

The Americans did also not want to see Eastern Europe become a Soviet sphere of influence, but without threatening to push the Red Army back with ground forces there was practically little that the United States could do. The first atomic bomb was also used by the US without informing Russia about it. With the creation of the UN, Stalin used his power of veto to block any initiatives that he perceived to be against Soviet interests. It is thus quite clear that this conference created great tension between the different countries. The Yalta conference is often seen as a success and many agreements were made, nevertheless, you could already at notice a gap between the allies and their ideologies since they could not reach a complete agreement on what to do with Germany. They did however come to some sort of agreement but they did not go the whole way. ...read more.

Conclusion

It can however be said that it was during these conferences that the differences were revealed. Without the differences in ideologies and interests there would not have been as many disputes and problems not being solved, and the tension leading to the cold war would not have been created. One can therefore say that the conferences only made the already existing problems surface, and made the tension visible. In conclusion, the two conferences did serve as an outlet for the already existing problems due to ideological differences of the US, Great Britain and Soviet. The tension rose due to disagreements among the allies and the inability to reach decisions for important issues. The cold war would thus not have started if there had not been underlying frustration between the allies, such as differences in ideology, and the conferences only made the suspicion and distrust rise since the countries were unable to reach decisions in the discussions. ?? ?? ?? ?? History home essay 02/10-08 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. 20th century- Cold WAR

    to end the war * 1953 - Stalin death made NK less confident * July 1953 - an armistice signed Was containment the right policy? * No doubt - communism must be stopped but question is how to do it * Some favored violent tactics as Mac Arthur and they

  2. Investigation: The Cuban Missile Crisis as a Thaw in the Cold War

    The means situated in Cuba, of which you speak and which disturb you, as you have stated, are in the hands of Soviet officers.

  1. The Cold War

    For that reason, steps were taken to win the support of West Germany. [31]In the year of 1947 restrictions on industrial production were relaxed.

  2. Why Did War Time Friends Become Cold War Enemies?

    new players on the scene, being president Truman for the United States and Prime Minister Clement Attlee for the United Kingdom differences between war leaders began to cook up, specially between President Truman and Stalin. Truman lacked Roosevelt�s diplomatic characteristics of negotiation and foresight; and put forth the development of

  1. Did Truman really save 500,000 American live through dropping the Hiroshima atomic bomb?

    9. Stimson, Henry. "The Decision to Use the Bomb." Harper's Magazine Feb. 1947: Print. 10. "Why prolong the war against Japan?"." Catholic World August 1945: Print. Documentary/Movie: 1. Morris, Errol, Dir. Fog of War. Sony Picture Classics: 2004, DVD. 2. Kurahara, Koreyoshi, and Spottiswoode, Roger Dir. Hiroshima. Echo Bridge Home Entertainment: 1995, DVD.

  2. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    On one hand, Britain had gone to war to defend the independence of Poland (to uphold her guarantee of Poland). On the other hand, Stalin wanted to move Polish borders westwards, taking some German territory (for security reasons). The difficulty was that Red Army troops controlled both Poland and Eastern Germany.

  1. The End of the Cold War.

    Gorbachev improved foreign relations by bringing down the Berlin Wall, due to his idea that the Soviet Union could survive in a new Europe by taking some Western Ideals while maintaining the Communist Party's leading role (Sheehan 1). One of Gorbachev's important reforms for the Soviet Union was his decision

  2. Assess the importance of ideological differences in the outbreak of the Cold War

    Ideologically America wanted a democratic Europe and was afraid of communism spreading and dominating over Europe. Russia wanted a communist Europe that they would dominate. The USSR feared a Europe dominated by capitalist nations. Historian LaFaber sees both the USSR and the USA as expansionist powers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work