• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was President Lyndon B. Johnson responsible for the escalation of the war in Vietnam? (1963-1969)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Historical Investigation To what extent was President Lyndon B. Johnson responsible for the escalation of the war in Vietnam? (1963-1969) A. Plan of investigation The particular question this investigation will be addressing is: "To what extent was Johnson solely responsible for escalating the was in Vietnam?" The focus of the sources used in answering this question looks at the policies and documents passed regarding American involvement in the war as well as evidence regarding military strategies and who was responsible for their creation and application. To analyze the true scale of the escalation of the war I will be looking at statistics and reports. Finally, I will address the assumption that the escalation of the war in Vietnam to the extent that it happened was intentional - therefore I will analyze at personal diary entries and memoirs of President Johnson, as well as letters and recorded conversations between him and his advisors, also taking into consideration social and political pressures that may have affected the situation. B. Summary of Evidence - Kennedy's decision to commit in Southeast Asia was rooted in the American pledge to battle and contain communism: and "Vietnam", Kennedy concluded, "is the place to make [America's] power credible"1. - "If freedom is to be saved, we need a whole new kind of strategy, a wholly different kind of force, and a wholly different kind of training and commitment"2. - Although Kennedy was willing to send U.S. military "advisers" into South Vietnam and mount covert operations in North Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, he drew the line on U.S. combat units which meant that the South Vietnamese would be responsible for fighting.3 - 22ndNovember 1963: Kennedy was assassinated. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand, there is evidence to support the idea that, in reality, Johnson did not mind this war: The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution stands as a turning point in the Vietnam war, giving USA the legal means to start an 'unofficial war'. The resolution, passed by congress on August 10th 1964 gave the president the right to further escalate the war, which, as figures show, was exactly what he did. Historian Newman suggests that the Gulf of Tonkin resolution was evidence of a second master plan, of Johnson carefully clearing a path to escalation. 19 Characters such as General Taylor and William Westmoreland played a joint role in convincing Johnson that escalation was necessary by providing false statistics that 'proved' their hypothesis while omitting some of the more pessimistic findings.20 They exploited Johnson by giving illusions of imminent victory: during the aftermath of the Tet attacks he announced that the enemy had suffered a "colossal military defeat....the US had never been in a better position in South Vietnam"21, while in reality the PLAF (Peoples Liberation Armed Forces) suffered approximately 40,000 deaths, compared to the 1,100 Americans and 2,300 ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam).22 The two generals can be considered to have given consensus to Johnson for escalating the war by giving him false indication of the US position in Vietnam and taking the conflict in their own hands. A skeptic Johnson was now standing responsible to a country who started asking for an answer: In public he continued to express an optimism that he didn't feel. In his speech at John Hopkins University, April 7 1965, he attempts to justify American involvement in Vietnam despite the situation: "We are there to strengthen world order. ...read more.

Conclusion

265, quoted in McMaster, H.R., (1998), Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Lies That Led to Vietnam, New York: Harper Perennial, p. 23 16 Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr offered exact figures in "Robert Kennedy and his Times", 1978: "When Kennedy became President, there were 685 American military advisers in Vietnam. In October 1963, there were 16,732". Others have been more tentative. The approximate figure of 700 is taken from Ronald H. Spector, "Advice and Support: The early years of the U.S. Army in Vietnam, 1941-1960), 1985; Reeves suggests in a figure of 17,000 for 1963 in "President Kennedy" p. 614. The imprecision of the figures springs from American unwillingness to admit the extent to which the Geneva Accords of 1954, which limited the size of military advisors efforts in North and South Vietnam, were being breached. Whether Schlesinger's figures are entirely accurate or not, the essential point is that under Kennedy there was, as Schlesinger noted, 'a formidable escalation'. 17 Robert A. Divine, "Eizenhower and the Cold War" (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), p. 37 18 H. R. McMaster, "Dereliction of Duty", 1997 19 Mark Taylor, "The Vietnam War in history, literature and film", British Association for American Studies 20 McMaster, H.R., (1998), Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Lies That Led to Vietnam, New York: Harper Perennial, p.57. 21 DeGroot, Gerard J., (2000), A Noble Cause?: America and the Vietnam War, London: Longman, p168. 22 Ibid. 23 Copy of the original text of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution found in "The Cold War, A History Though Documents" by Edward Judge, John Langdon, 1998, p. 140 24 Ibid. 25 Ibid. 26 Robert Divine, "Vietnam: An Episode in the Cold War", in Lloyd Garder, ed., "Vietnam: The Early Decisions", p.4 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. US and the Vietnam War

    By Andrew Wiest. New York: Rosen, 2002 .Pg 59. "...the extended length of the war, the high number of U.S. casualties, and the exposure of U.S. involvement in war crimes, such as the massacre at My Lai, helped turn many in the United States against the Vietnam War." This Day in History 1973: U.S. Withdraws from Vietnam. Unsolved Mysteries.

  2. The Cold War

    was the pinnacle of the war's focus through the event of the Berlin Blockade and Airlift. The Berlin Blockade was the Soviet's answer to the West's strategies for West Germany. In June 1948, Stalin's troops blocked all railroad, highway, and water traffic going through East Germany to West Berlin.

  1. The cold war - the conferences and the start of the cCold War

    On this view, Stalin felt that he had not been fully informed on nuclear developments. It could be argued that the dropping of the atom bomb was a means of exhibiting American power to the Russians. Moreover, it could be viewed as an American plot to win the war against Japan without Russian help.

  2. The History and Development of the American Dream

    There are many other factors that play a role like language, luck, IQ or family. The American Dream is misleading, because the people who don?t have success and wealth might quickly think that it is their own fault. And the wealthier also make less effort to help the poor, because

  1. Explain the USAs policy of containment. How successful was this in Korea, Vietnam and ...

    It is argued that the filming in Vietnam was the cause of the defeat of the war in Vietnam as it lead to a lack of support from the people at home. Therefore USA?s policy of containment was failing at this point as although militarily they were able to defeat

  2. History IA: What were American peoples responses to the Vietnam War in 1965 1971?

    Industrial workers Public opinion polls showed that working people, including union members, were already divided in their opinions on the Vietnam war by the mid-1960s, and, by mid-1969, workers in ?manual? or ?blue collar? occupations favored withdrawing troops more strongly than those in ?professional or business? categories (that was from a July 1969 Gallop Poll)[9].

  1. To What Extent Did The Space Race Exacerbate Political Tensions Between The USA and ...

    April 20th 1964 announced that the USA would cut back on production of materials for the manufacturing of Nuclear Weaponry, at the same time Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev announced the same intentions for the USSR. This reduction would mean Khrushchev would have to stand down from his ?single-variant strategy? and

  2. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    of the US and SU, for the idea of a Jewish state, he did not expect statehood to be delivered on a silver platter. Realising that ultimately the Jews would have to fight for their state, he wanted a clear-cut Jewish military victory." - Ze'ev Jabotinsky: (founder of Revisionist Zionism)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work