• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

To what extent were the social changes in Germany between 1865 and 1890 the result of Bismarcks deliberate policies?

Extracts from this document...


Nicole Belenska ? 001441-0031 ? Extended Essay Extended Essay in History Zlatarski International School ? Sofia Name of student: Nicole Belenska Session: May 2014 Session number: 001441-0031 Supervisor: Boris Todorov Bismarck?s impact on Germany?s social structure Research question: To what extent the social changes in Germany between 1865 and 1890 were the result of Bismarck?s deliberate policies? Word count: 3,632 Abstract The social changes in Germany between 1865 and 1890 were the result of Bismarck?s clearly focused policies pursuing precise aims: the unification of Germany, Germany becoming an industrial power, destroying old geopolitical alliances and creating new ones, and provoking political actions. Even though Bismarck did not follow a general masterplan, he responded to particular issues like the unification of Germany, the Kulturkampf (?struggle for civilization?, in fact struggle against Catholicism), the growth of the Socialist movement, in a consistent manner and his various domestic policies were tightly connected with his tide-turning foreign policy. In this essay I use the method of breaking down different aspects of the social transformations in Germany and analyzing the causal links behind every single one of them. I find specific reasons for each of those significant changes and I am rather poised to think that those changes responded to objective challenges and Bismarck?s administration just found helpful solutions. I assess the real weight of Bismarck?s policies through hypothesizing alternative solutions. The main idea of Bismarck was to transform Germany from a loose confederation into a powerful empire through three phases: Preparation, Provocation and Nationalism. As the Kulturkampf sought to limit the social importance of religion and banned Catholic education, many opposed Bismarck and the Catholic Centre Party was unable to maintain control. The anti-socialist movement and in particular the assassinations on Kaiser Wilhelm I helped to reduce easily the Socialists?s influence by turning them into the object of public blame: Socialist literature was confiscated, pro-working class groups were banned and people were expelled from their homes. On the other hand Bismarck never went on a conquering rampage. ...read more.


b. Foundations of national identity Germany was already a unified state, yet the German nation was still in the making. National identity and self-determination was still to be enforced on, and embraced by, the vast majority of the German population. This could be achieved through mass propaganda. During the 1870s education in Germany was under the control of the Catholic Church. The church itself might represent a conductor of foreign influence, since it was submitted to the Papacy in Rome. In order for Bismarck to achieve his goal of uniting Germany, he had to use the educational system as a source of pan-Germanic propaganda, which sought to boost the German national identity. The economic advantages of a lively, and liberal, German market slowly brought down the reserves of German states like Hanover, Baden-Wurtemberg or even Bavaria against the creation of a Unitarian German state. Bismarck combined economic pressure with diplomatic prudence by suggesting, and successfully implementing, the creation of a German confederation (1866) in which the smaller states would keep their local governments, much of their local taxes and would keep hold of most important domestic institutions like police and education. Thus, they were misled into thinking that they were not giving up on any important privilege, but instead would only profit from the economic integration of the various German areas. Still, the Catholics were a stain on Bismarck?s unification clause because they followed the Pope rather than the Kaiser. The German Prime minister needed a way to reduce their numbers so he came up with the Kulturkampf. Literally meaning ?culture struggle? these new laws limited many of the religious rituals of the German Catholics, the laws stayed in power from 1871 to 1878. It limited like a disregard of their clerical freedom of speech, completely banning Catholic schools and teachers. Many priests were arrested and either sent to prison or exiled for preaching, their numbers are estimated to be around 1800. ...read more.


It comes easily to mind that when the Kulturkampf was launched, the Catholics would be afraid that it could damage forever their political and social positions. Yet, Bismarck?s anti-Catholic policies did not destroy in the least the Catholics? belief in new Germany. Bennett?s main point is to make people reconsider the connection between religious and national identity but what she argued helps us argue in favour of Bismarck?s historical significance: with or without Catholic minority, with or without the Kulturkampf, which in fact led to nothing, since Catholics did not give up their confessional identity and created one of the most influential political parties in Germany ? Zentrum, Bismarck?s Germany was strong and undivided. ________________ Conclusion Otto Von Bismarck?s role in European history can mislead. On first glance it seems limited to his role in German reunification, which changed the balance of power, destroyed the old alliances, and disrupt the status quo not only in Central Europe but in the Balkan peninsula and the Mediterranean as well. Bismarck dealt a death blow to the Congress of Vienna. His foreign policy caused a historical shift of power in the European continent and the colonial world. Bismarck?s Germany defeated the Habsburg Empire reducing it to a mere satellite state. The swift victory of the German army during the Franco-Prussian war and the system of alliances created by Bismarck quickly isolated France from the continental politics. This created a long-lasting peace which was greatly beneficial for the development, the unification and the germanisation of the young German state. This long period of stability, in combination with the ever-growing rate of industrialisation fuelled the German economy. Conversely, the process of rapid growth turned Germany into a major industrial power. Regardless of some failures in his domestic policies, Bismarck achieved so much through the awakening of German nationalism that the social profile of Germany changed once for all and in fact stood at the basis of social and public policies all over Europe over the later decades. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. the importance of the role of Bismarck in the unification of Germany in 1871

    The Zollverein, however, did not only create a basis for a unified Germany, but also greatly increased Prussia's economic strength, which was to become the means by which Bismarck was able to finance the three wars that directly lead to the German Unification.

  2. Why was Germany unified by Prussia and not by Austria?

    Napoleon III was looking to expand territories and those German states were in a particular weak position. However due to Prussia's military efforts, these states were able to avoid French control and Prussia was able to extend its influence. The Austrian army though, was weak and unorganized.

  1. To what extent was Napoleon III responsible for the unification of Italy?

    He had not been interested in the south because it was rural and had failed to industrialize as the north did. He was forced to unite the north and the south, however, because he feared that rebellious soldiers in the south would continue to grow and eventually attempt to gain control of the north.

  2. The Unification of Germany

    He was appointed chancellor and solved the problem by drawing up the reform. This would come back in handy later on, as Bismarck was a man who relied a lot on the army, and believed it was the way to gain success, hence why he is often called the "Iron Chancellor".

  1. The European partition of Africa cannot be explained in economic terms alone. How far ...

    turn France's attention away from seeking revenge with Germany; in addition, he also used overseas expansion as a tool to seek political gain and popularity within the country, as he remarked: "all this colonial business is a sham but we need it for the elections."

  2. Notes on Italian unification - background and main events

    failed for several reasons: o They weren't well organized o They were easily infiltrated by the authorities (spies, etc...) o They betrayed each other quite easily - Due to the numerous failures, Mazzini began to abandon the Carbonari The Revolution of 1820- 1821 - There was a revolution against the

  1. Italian Unification: True Father of Italy

    To add on to its prestige, Italy's first steamship, the 'Sicilia' was built in Genoa in 1855, and Italy's first home-produced railway locomotives were built. Also, further schemes were in progress for the construction of the Mont Cenis tunnel through the Alps, and for the modernization of the port of Genoa.

  2. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Underlying idea that the way to maintain support for the regime was to create a class of prosperous peasants. Key problems to be addressed were: 1. Mir?s negative effect on modernization 2. Ineffective land usage in the village leading to inefficient agriculture 3.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work