• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the 1905 revolution a result of poor leadership?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was the 1905 revoltion a result of poor leadership? The 1905 revolution happened for many reasons. These include the leadership qualities of Tsar Nicholas II, the decisions he made, the conditions in Russia at the time, and the Russo-Japanese war. When Tsar Alexander III died unexpectedly in 1894, his son Nicholas was to become the new leader of Russia. Nicholas was always a very sociable character but lacked interest in his tutor's lessons. He had no interest in political matters and would rather see his friends in cafes. As the new Tsar of Russia, he was much unprepared and even asked his cousin, "What am i to do? I am not prepared to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling." Excited at the thought of a new ruler, the peasants and workers went to Winter Palace to ask for constitutional reforms. He went on to call it a 'senseless dream' much to the publics' horror. ...read more.

Middle

This urbanisation resulted in the overcrowdment of cities, leading to diseases and unhappiness. Up to ten people could fit in a room. The factories were not a nice place to be with poor health and safety regualtions, harsh dicipline, long hours and low pay. The workers had reached a level of overall discontent, and they felt that the Tsar was not helping the situation. Georgi Gapon thus formed a union of Russian workers, which was very popular. Russia as a country was very backward compared to its western neighbours. There were poor communications links and the farmers were self-sufficient, relying on their own produce. This means that should there be a poor harvest; the farmers would starve, resulting in extreme discontent towards the Tsar. This happened in1897, 1898 and 1901. One could argue that Tsar Nicholas II had become the leader of an already problematic country, that was geographicaly huge and therefore it was hard to communicate, thus not being his fault. ...read more.

Conclusion

He then decided to keep the old regimes that seemed to be working, much to the horror of the public. His marriage and family life played a big part in his imperial role. Alix of Hesse advised him to keep autocracy, and she was the only person Nicholas listened to. He devoted more time to his family than political matters. Urbanisation caused upset in living conditions, and working conditions. The pubic felt that the Tsar didn't help them, and thought they were being harshly treated. The famines of 1897, 1898 and 1901 caused discontent towards the Tsar for not doing anything about it, and they started to look for faults.The Russo-Japenese war affected the overall morale and the military pride Russia once had. Nicholas mismanaged the war, and people questioned his military leadership skills. 'Bloody Sunday' was a short term cause of the revolution. The way the leader of Russia dealt with this angered the pubic, The Tsar unjustly crushed the petitioners, by which time, the Tsar was a hated figure in Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Russia 1905 revolution

    They believed in a violent struggle and were responsible for the assassination of two government officials, as well as the murder of a large number of police agents and spies. They had wide support in the towns and the country side.

  2. Was the Russian Revolution due more to tsars inadequacy as a ruler of the ...

    Nicholas II believed his wife's words that all will be fine if the Duma (elected legislative body) didn't take action the riots. The inaction of the Duma stopped nothing. Demonstrations continued on. Even the police force didn't take action against the demonstrators.

  1. Napoleon: Son or Enemy of the Revolution

    (Alexander, 52) This previous phrase is the definition of fraternity, something established by Napoleon. During Napoleons rule, many wars were fought by the French army, which as a result brought unison to the country. Nonetheless, he paid close attention on recognizing the expansion and militarization of his domain, and due

  2. French Revolution: Success or Failure?

    Therefore, the French Revolution created another positive point and effect through the New Constitution. Most of the Constitution that created during the Revolution era was to give equality and right to the French citizens. Clearly, the French Revolution produced lots of contents as well as clubs that helped and improved the French society.

  1. To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894?

    Nicholas did have some positive personalities. He was very hard working and dedicated to the autocracy. In his first decade in office, he spent days in his office working. Nicholas had quite some qualities when it comes to intelligence, manners and potential to rule.

  2. To what extent did Alexander Tsar II deserve the title of Tsar Liberator

    The basic principle of the edict had been that the serf was to be given land when he was freed. However, there was not enough land to allow every serf to support himself and yet the government imposed heavy taxes and debts on the serf; the idea being that the serf could pay for the land in instalments.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Other powers (levying taxes, appointing officials, maintaining law and order) remained in the hands of the governors appointed by the Tsar. 5. Similar councils were introduced in cities in 1870 called Dumy. 6. Liberals hoped that these reforms would lead to a national assembly but Alexander refused to surrender autocratic control.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    But the peasantry were still not liberated. It just moved from a system which could be compared to American slavery to a system of oppressive rule. It was successful in changing Russia?s backward image. Western Europe would have viewed it as a new modern Russia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work