• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the 1905 revolution a result of poor leadership?

Extracts from this document...


Was the 1905 revoltion a result of poor leadership? The 1905 revolution happened for many reasons. These include the leadership qualities of Tsar Nicholas II, the decisions he made, the conditions in Russia at the time, and the Russo-Japanese war. When Tsar Alexander III died unexpectedly in 1894, his son Nicholas was to become the new leader of Russia. Nicholas was always a very sociable character but lacked interest in his tutor's lessons. He had no interest in political matters and would rather see his friends in cafes. As the new Tsar of Russia, he was much unprepared and even asked his cousin, "What am i to do? I am not prepared to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling." Excited at the thought of a new ruler, the peasants and workers went to Winter Palace to ask for constitutional reforms. He went on to call it a 'senseless dream' much to the publics' horror. ...read more.


This urbanisation resulted in the overcrowdment of cities, leading to diseases and unhappiness. Up to ten people could fit in a room. The factories were not a nice place to be with poor health and safety regualtions, harsh dicipline, long hours and low pay. The workers had reached a level of overall discontent, and they felt that the Tsar was not helping the situation. Georgi Gapon thus formed a union of Russian workers, which was very popular. Russia as a country was very backward compared to its western neighbours. There were poor communications links and the farmers were self-sufficient, relying on their own produce. This means that should there be a poor harvest; the farmers would starve, resulting in extreme discontent towards the Tsar. This happened in1897, 1898 and 1901. One could argue that Tsar Nicholas II had become the leader of an already problematic country, that was geographicaly huge and therefore it was hard to communicate, thus not being his fault. ...read more.


He then decided to keep the old regimes that seemed to be working, much to the horror of the public. His marriage and family life played a big part in his imperial role. Alix of Hesse advised him to keep autocracy, and she was the only person Nicholas listened to. He devoted more time to his family than political matters. Urbanisation caused upset in living conditions, and working conditions. The pubic felt that the Tsar didn't help them, and thought they were being harshly treated. The famines of 1897, 1898 and 1901 caused discontent towards the Tsar for not doing anything about it, and they started to look for faults.The Russo-Japenese war affected the overall morale and the military pride Russia once had. Nicholas mismanaged the war, and people questioned his military leadership skills. 'Bloody Sunday' was a short term cause of the revolution. The way the leader of Russia dealt with this angered the pubic, The Tsar unjustly crushed the petitioners, by which time, the Tsar was a hated figure in Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Napoleon: Son or Enemy of the Revolution

    In order to fulfill Napoleon's desire for control, France's territorial limits were increasing at a fast rate. Economically speaking Napoleon evidently altered the system. For instance, in order to make sure that there would not be a financial reproduction of the "Bourbon era", he abundantly used the more constructive policies.

  2. Was the Tsar to blame for his own downfall?

    He's stubborn nature was shown in the wrong times. For example, he failed to create a political stable government and to widen support for political order by bringing in a parliamentary government as he believed only in an autocratic government. Therefore, he used repression to control his regime and as Pipes states, he "employed five instruments: the civil service,

  1. French Revolution: Success or Failure?

    Under this document, the French citizens are equal and they should have same privilege without any discrimination such as social background. Truly, through this article, the French people were guaranteed the rights of freedom, liberty and security. Due to the lack of organization of King Louis XVI, the French people had to fight with poverty.

  2. Russia 1905 revolution

    These people were called liberals or "Cadets". Two other groups were more violently opposed to the Tsar. They believed that revolution was the answer to the people's troubles. The Socialist Revolutionaries were a radical movement. Their main aim was to carve up the huge estates of the nobility and hand them over to the peasants.

  1. Napoleon Bonaparte: Son or Enemy of the Revolution?

    Cambridge: Cambridge Univesity, 2001: 76. -Napoleon used propaganda in education in order to engrave his mentality and moral to the children of France: the imperial catechism.8 -He used propaganda such as the Bulletins, regular reports of Napoleon's heroic deeds, which were carefully edited and published in France, as a way to gain respect, confidence and

  2. To what extend was Nicholas II prepared to become tsar in 1894?

    Nicholas did have some positive personalities. He was very hard working and dedicated to the autocracy. In his first decade in office, he spent days in his office working. Nicholas had quite some qualities when it comes to intelligence, manners and potential to rule.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Payments were much like direct taxation and were roughly equal to pre-emancipation feudal dues. 4. Land was overvalued to benefit the landowners. Peasants were burdened with debt which was aggravated by the poll tax. 5. Once peasants had reach this final stage their legal and economic ties with their landowners were transferred to the commune and the government.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Alexander II of Russia's reforms.

    But the peasantry were still not liberated. It just moved from a system which could be compared to American slavery to a system of oppressive rule. It was successful in changing Russia?s backward image. Western Europe would have viewed it as a new modern Russia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work