• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What extent was the alliance system responsible for causing World War One?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐LEE, Soo Gee (Suzie) 11 ABe What extent was the alliance system responsible for causing World War One? From the late ninetieth century to the twentieth century, the ?Great Powers? of Europe had created relationships with one another through alliances. These alliances were agreements made between countries for mutual military or diplomatic aid. By the twentieth century, the time leading to the start of the World War One, there were two prevalent rival camps or alliance systems: the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente. The Triple Alliance, formed in 1882, between Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy, derived from the Dual Alliance of 1879 between Germany and Austria-Hungary, which was made against France and Russia. It was made so that Italy cannot be against the Dual Alliance partners. The other main alliance was the Triple Entente, confirmed in between Great Britain, France and Russia. This alliance was made through the minor alliances of the Entente Cordiale (1904) and the Anglo-Russian Entente (1907), which were due to the growing bad relationships with Germany. The alliances created frosty relations; thus, stemming many crises. We can clearly see that the ?ingredients?[1] that produced the First World War were generated through this system of alliances. However, this system of alliances only had partial significance, as there are other factors, which had bigger responsibility for causing World War One. The alliance system only had a fractional impact on causing World War One. ...read more.

Middle

This view supports the idea that the alliance system only had a partial, limited significance, as there are so many other factors with bigger responsibilities for starting the war. In addition, the actions of the respective Great Powers had important responsibility, which emphasizes that the system of alliances was not so significant in creating the war. After the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, on 28th of June 1914, the Emperor, Franz Joseph was actually pleased, as his nephew had married someone that was part of the royal social circle. The Emperor felt that ?God has reasserted the rules?[4]. Yet, after the government found Serbian involvement, they acted against Serbia, through the ten-point ultimatum on 23rd of July 1914, as a ?renunciation of our (their) Great Power position?.[5] The ultimatum was intended by the Austrian government to have very difficult demands so that Serbia would be unable to submit to. Thus, this ultimatum can be seen as a significant action of the Great Power, Austria-Hungary, which introduces the war. In addition, the Great Power, Russia had a big impact on driving the start of the war as the Russians began mobilizing secretly on the 23rd of July 1914, in support of the Serbians. Furthermore, Russia wanted to prove its strength due to its humiliation in the Bosnian Crisis. The Russia mobilization was crucial factor to starting the war as it was popularly thought ?mobilization means war?[6]. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was a major event in the start of the war, as the Serbian terrorist group the Blank Hand supported the ring of assassins, which favored a united south Slav state, a Yugoslavia, causing Austria-Hungary act against Serbia. Furthermore, Militarism moderately added to causing the war. Militarism a crucial factor as it is the confidence of a country as it highlights the nation?s strength to go to war. There was also rivalry in military as to having the most mobilized military. For example, France set out the Three Year Service Law where they extended service requirement of conscripts. Also, during the Mulliner Panic of 1909, Britain feared a stealth buildup when it was found that Germany had secretly contracted to build two battleships. However, due to military rivalry, Britain responded later with the slogan ?We want eight [new battleships] and we won?t wait.? Furthermore, imperialism caused tension and more competition, which contributed to causing the World War One. The German concept of Weltpolitik created rivalry with Britain as Britain was the biggest empire and Germany?s new policy was a threat. In conclusion, the alliance system was only partially responsible for causing the World War One. The system of alliance was more a symptom of other bigger factors and responsibilities that caused the World War One. Although, the alliance system may have had a very small responsibility for causing the world war one but there always will be many opinions on which factor has what degree of importance. Word Count: 1467. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was the alliance system responsible for the outbreak of World War ...

    In my opinion this encouraged A-H to become a lot more aggressive, after this alliance was formed, they knew that they could do anything with the support of Germany behind them; this led to their aggression in the Balkans. A very important alliance was between Russia and Serbia, in this

  2. What was the Effect of Nationalism on World War I?

    The top priority from there was to ensure that if attacked, there would be allies who could threaten the enemy. So, Germany turned to Austria, which could threaten Russia, as the two were already attempting to establish control of the unstable Balkans.

  1. Who was responsible for the Cold War?

    perhaps more famously the Vietnam war where so many Americans died, where one and a half million Vietnamese died, and where the US efforts failed to stop, and even helped to spread, Communism or the 'red tide'. Historically the Soviets also had good reason to distrust the 'West' (and Japan).

  2. To what extent was Imperialism the key cause of World War One ?

    Overall it is clear that imperialism played a strong role in creating some important tensions, but perhaps of greater importance were those connected to nationalism. Nationalism was very much at the heart of this conflict. It was nationalism that lay at the centre of many nations' desire to expand, both within Europe and outside it.

  1. The Impact of the Manhattan Project on the Cold War

    Communist leaders in general weren't proponents of such a doctrine which gave countries who were currently operating under their governmental beliefs the ability to perform illegal acts. The intransigent attitude of both sides helped to cause the Cold War. After America had created, and used the atomic bomb to attack

  2. "To what extent can it be said that the First World War was caused ...

    When the French occupied Tunisia, Bismarck took advantage of Italian resentment towards France and created The Triple Alliance between Germany, Italy and Austria- Hungary in 1882. They signed a document that insured military support in a case of an outbreak of war.

  1. IB History HL, Extended Notes: Russia, the Tsars, the Provisional Govenment and the Revolution.

    Did not offer a viable alternative to autocracy. Lack of political tradition in Russia meant that much thinking was too utopian rather than rooted in realities of governing a state. 3. No clear united front of opposition, different groups worked for different and sometimes conflicting objectives.

  2. To what extent did the Munich Conference contribute to the outbreak of World War ...

    (Schmitz and Challener, 51) However, for the orthodox historians, the Munich Conference, along with the Appeasement, was a total failure that did not achieve the aim of peace protecting. According to Keith Middlemass, ?it was based on a wholly defensive military strategy, which neither protected Britain adequately from air attack nor offered a deterrent to Hitler? (McDonough 4).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work