• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

mathsbreaking

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mathematics

Course Work

Dominique Albert-Weiss

 “Stopping disntances”


Table 1

Speed v (km/h)

Thinking distance (m)

Braking distance  (m)

32

6

6

48

9

14

64

12

24

80

15

38

96

18

55

112

21

75

  1. Use a GDC or graphing software to create two data plots: speed versus thinking distance and speed versus braking distance. Describe your results.

Graph 1

image00.png

The given values in Table 1 of speed (km/h) and thinking distance (m) were plotted against each other in this graph. With close observation, it is noticeable that the speed is proportional to the thinking distance. In other words: the points construct a straight line that is going through the origin.

In this example, we are able to assume that the more the driver increases his/her speed, the more time it takes him/her to apply the brakes.

Graph 2

image01.png

In graph 2, the values of Table 1 of speed (km/h)

...read more.

Middle

y = 0.1875x

Function for graph 2 (speed vs. braking distance):

One way to find out the function of the graph to is by using the quadratic regression method.

This can only be done on the GDC (Graphic Calculator) and gives you the result:

y = 0.0061x² - 0.0232x + 0.6

  1. The overall stopping distance is obtained from adding the thinking distance to the braking distance. Create a data table of speed and overall stopping distance. Graph this data nad describe the results.

Total braking distance = thinking distance + braking distance

Table 2

Speed (km/h)

Thinking distance (m)

Braking distance (m)

Total braking distance (m)

32

6

6

12

48

9

14

23

64

12

24

36

80

15

38

53

96

18

55

73

112

21

75

96

Graph 3

image02.png

Therefore that the braking distance was added with the thinking distance, it is logical that the y-intercepts of graph 3 are higher than the ones of graph 1 and 2.

...read more.

Conclusion

this data, and what modifications might be necessary.

Table 3

Speed (km/h)

Stopping distance (m)

10

2.5

40

17

90

65

160

180

Graph 4

image03.png

Graph 4 represents the stopping distance and the time that were given in the table.

The function of speed vs. thinking distance which is y = 0.1875x, where x is equal the speed.

Speed (km/h)

Stopping distance (m)

Thinking distance (m)

10

2.5

1.875

40

17

7.5

90

65

16.875

160

180

30

The same is done with the function of speed vs. braking distance which is y = 0.0061x² - 0.0232x + 0.6.

Speed (km/h)

Stopping distance (m)

Braking distance (m)

10

2.5

0.978

40

17

9.432

90

65

47.922

160

180

153.048

It is shown that the results that were given at the beginning (thinking and braking distance) are both much lower than the results of the stopping distance.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

  1. portfolio Braking distance of cars

    Therefore, the appropriate equation will be; [y =]. Substitute these values below into the function to find the function. Speed (km/h) Braking distance (m) 32 6 48 14 64 24 80 38 96 55 112 75 x = speed y = braking thinking y= 6 = a= = = y= (0.00585)

  2. Stopping distances portfolio. In this task, we may develop individual functions that model the ...

    m = 0.1875 then: c = 12 - 64m c = 12 - 64 x 0.1875 c = 0 Therefore the hand calculated model of the relationship between the speed of the vehicle to the thinking distance is y = 0.1875x Excel Calculated y = ax + b, a =

  1. A logistic model

    Graphical plot of the fish population of the hydroelectric project on an interval of 106 years using the logistic function model {19}. The model considers an annual harvest of 8x103 fish. A stable population (4x104) is reached. b. Consider an initial population u1=3.0x104 fish.

  2. Creating a logistic model

    r = 2.9, 3.2), however its growth rate was much too high in the beginning, causing the population of fish to soar much above the sustainable limit. Since when there are 60000 fish, growth rate is 1, any population of fish higher than this will result in a growth rate of less than 1 i.e.

  1. Stopping Distances

    = 1792a + 16b 2 = 512a a � 0.003900 8 = 1280 (0.0039) + 16b 8 = 4.992 + 16b 3.008 = 16b b � 0.1880 6 = 1024 (0.0039) + 32 (0.188) + c 6 = 3.9936 + 6.016 + c c � -4.0096 y = 0.0039x2 + 0.188x - 4.0096 Percentage of error (112, 75)

  2. The speed of Ada and Fay

    Therefore, now I had define the velocity of Ada's running speed and Fay's speed. Furthermore, I am going to use the information I got above to construct a diagram out, which simulates the situation. Diagram involve both runner position and direction In this diagram, there will be direction indicate where

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work