• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using empirical evidence examine the concepts of normality and abnormality

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Using Empirical Evidence examine the concepts of normality and abnormality. Abnormal psychology is the branch of psychology that deals with studying, explaining and treating mental, emotional and behavioral problems. One of the most difficult issues in this area is the definition of abnormality. Although people make judgments about what is abnormal, these are influenced by social and cultural factors. Definitely, the distinction between what is abnormal and what is normal is very difficult, and looking at different common interpretations of abnormality accentuates this problem. Moreover, there is empirical evidence that shows that it is quite hard to confidently characterize a behavior as abnormal. An interpretation of normality that depends on literal meaning assumes there is such a thing as average behavior, or behavior that most frequently occurs in particular situations. Hence, any behavior that is not statistically frequent and deviates from the statistical average is considered as abnormal. Researchers who take a statistical approach assess how characteristics are distributed in the general population, meaning they create a normal distribution curve. This is a bell shaped curve where most people score around the middle in any given population. However, there are limitations regarding this definition of abnormality. First of all, there are problems deciding how statistically rare a behavior has to be in order to be considered as abnormal. In addition, statistical deviation from the average does not give information regarding the desirability of the deviation; both mental retardation and genius are statistically rare but only the former is considered abnormal. ...read more.

Middle

They created a complex interview called the life events and difficulties scale (LEDS). A group of 539 women in Camberwell, London were interviewed using LEDS aimed to uncover stressful events in the previous years as well as childhood events. Events were rated by a many blind researchers. They found that both recent high levels of stress and having suffered a stressful childhood event left people particularly vulnerable to depression. In the previous year, 37 of them (8 per cent of the total) had become clinically depressed. Of these, 33 (almost 90 per cent) had suffered an adverse life event. Three of the four factors that had the strongest associations with depression involved recent levels of stress. These were: lack of an intimate relationship, lack of paid employment, and the presence of three of more children in the home. However, childhood events were also important, especially the death of the mother before the age of 11. The study by Brown and Harris does not establish cause and effect relationship (correlation) and it is mainly a qualitative research. In other words it examines the meaning of participants? actions and words. In addition, the sample is non-representative since it is a purposive sampling, and therefore it is difficult to generalize. On the other hand, theoretical generalizations can be made and new theories can emerge that potentially can be generalized. Moreover, a significant problem of this study is memory distortions. Probably, some participants do not remember well some events from their childhood. ...read more.

Conclusion

All were forced to admit to having a mental illness and agree to take antipsychotic drugs as a condition of their release. The second part involved asking staff at a psychiatric hospital to detect non-existent "fake" patients during a 3 month period. No fake patients were sent, yet 41 real patients were judged with great confidence to be pseudo by at least one member of staff. The staff falsely identified large numbers of ordinary patients as impostors. The study concluded, "It is clear that we cannot distinguish the sane from the insane in psychiatric hospitals" and also illustrated the dangers of dehumanization and labeling in psychiatric institutions. Therefore, this study is a very strong evidence that is very difficult to distinguish normal from abnormal. This study had an enormous impact in psychiatry. It sparked off a discussion and revision of diagnostic procedures as well as discussion of the consequences of diagnosis for patients. The development of diagnostic manuals has increased validity and reliability. The method used raises ethical issues but it was justified since the results provided evidence of problems in diagnosis which could benefit others. There is strong deception and there were also serious ethical issues in the follow-up study since the staff thought that impostors would present, but they were real patients and may have not received the treatment they needed. In conclusion, it is extremely difficult to precisely explain what an abnormal behavior is. However, there are diagnostic symptoms available to mental health practitioners that allow them to deal with the exceptions and problems of the definitions of abnormal behavior mentioned above. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Psychology essays

  1. IA stroop effect

    * Your name, age, nationality and identity will remain confidential. * At the end of the experiment you will be fully debriefed. * During the test, you will be asked to read a list of words. You are to read the words as quickly as you can.

  2. Examine the Concepts of Normality & Abnormality

    What does become clearer upon closer inspection is that the application of Jahoda's criteria of normality requires a substantial degree of subjective judgement. The reason at least in part was that "it is difficult to define these criteria precisely", as was admitted by Crane & Hannibal.

  1. IB Revision Psych

    - The dogs where put in a harness, and shown stimuli and then given food. Eventually after many trials, they were just presented with the stimuli, such as a light or a sound, and the dogs would salivate without the food being present.

  2. Psychology IB Abnormal Notes and Essay Plans

    Are these imbalances a cause or a symptom? 2. Weight gain/loss is symptom of depression and serotonin plays a part in controlling appetite so could contribute to this effect. This could also contribute to eating disordered behaviour. Psychomotor agitation, fidgeting are a symptoms of depression which could have a biological cause.

  1. Examine/ discuss the concepts of normality and abnormality

    Diagnosis based on factors like the person?s clinical and medical conditions and to what extent their mental state interferes with his or her daily life. LIMITATIONS Ethical concerns Misuse of the model, since the criteria used for diagnosis are not objective and can be influenced by culture and politics (Gross 2002)

  2. Psychology IB Abnormality Notes

    Conclusion: genetics may have an effect on people getting bulimia. However people may be secretive when asked about bulimia, therefore self-reporting data is not reliable 1. Strober 2000: first-degree relatives of woman with bulimia are 10 times more likely than average to develop the disorder 1.

  1. Where does Schizophrenia Lie in the Spectrum of Nature vs Nurture?

    By having extra support, the schizophrenic will feel have motivation to get better and will have hope. Additionally, many different therapeutic treatments may be done such as individual and cognitive therapy and support groups. If individual therapy is successful, it may allow a schizophrenic to be able to ?differentiate between

  2. Discuss cultural and ethical considerations in diagnosis of abnormal psychology.

    When there they said they heard voices. They said the voices were unclear, of the same sex and saying one single word.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work