• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the artist. To what extent, then, can the historian be confident about his or her conclusions?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

IB Theory of Knowledge Essay 2: History Title 2: "A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the artist." To what extent, then, can the historian be confident about his or her conclusions? Thursday April 29th, 2010 When studying or learning history, will anybody ever achieve a state of absolute certainty? Is there even such a thing as certainty? The hardest part of studying history is the gathering of evidence that supports information that is being processed. This evidence is necessary to unravel information about events that have occurred in the past. Evidence is ultimately the main factor that leads to the understanding and knowledge of the occurring of an event. It plays a role in the 'difficult aspect of studying history' because there is a question of reliability and credibility of the piece of evidence. The degree of reliability is correlated to the creation of different opinions and points of views that are developed over past events. Different conclusions are made based on the different evidences presented, and even though the historians who make these conclusions believe in them, they know that absolute certainty is unrealistic. Because the evidences that some interpret are biased, the historians need the 'rigor of the scientist'. And because the 'rigor of the scientist' will most typically not tend to fill in every question mark, the 'imagination of the artist' helps fill in the voids. ...read more.

Middle

Some reasoned that because he suffered from these problems, he was dead. This of course is based on some evidence of injury however there is no solid evidence that proves his death; therefore, imagination has played an evident role. The mind develops the point of view. The people who had a particular form of perceiving and reasoning assumed and believed he was dead. However, not everyone, of course, agreed on this opinion. Because of the fact that every person has different perceptions, emotions, language and reasoning, its likely to have several different conclusions drawn from the same piece of evidence. This is why, unlike rigor, imagination refers more to the subjective part of history. Both rigor and imagination are necessary to history. While rigor allows the objectivity and main facts to enter into the historian's knowledge, the imagination fills in the voids uncovered by the rigor. This imagination is -of course- influenced by the individual historian's perception, reason, emotion and language. He or she will connect the dots brought upon by the rigor using his or her mind. The fact that ones imagination is unique to that of someone else's proves that it is possible to reach new perspectives on events. This means that new ideas flourish around the world and wide varieties of conclusions are drawn. ...read more.

Conclusion

All these sources of uncertainty play a role in the confidence of the historian. Because historians imagine things differently, depending on their individual reasoning and perceiving of the real world, they are each going to have individual conclusions that would differ from other historians. Because there are so many perspectives towards historical events, there is increased uncertainty. When a historian takes into consideration these two important sources of error-large number of opinions and lack of certainty-, it's hard for them be confident about conclusions. Anyhow, since historians trust that evidence is real and believe in their analysis of the events, they are confident about their own conclusions. After they undergo the twofold process of rigor and imagination, they can make a conclusion based on the evidence. This doesn't mean that they are absolutely certain about what happened. What they record is what they believe, but they of course leave a leeway and are open to error, inaccuracy, and opposing ideas. In conclusion, since the role of rigor and imagination are crucial to the interpretation of historical events, they are also crucial to the creation of opinions. Because rigor and imagination shape the way in which history is presented to us and since opinions stem from different interpretations of history, rigor and imagination are related to opinions. The creation of more opinions and the difference in thought both increase uncertainty, whose degree describes the confidence that the historian has. Word Count: 1,377 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    But history involves humans, and the information and facts of history can only with human imagination be 25 interpreted and put into a context. While scientific and artistic knowledge are both strong forms of knowledge, in which the knower has a high degree of confidence about his conclusions, they contain

  2. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    Does this mean that we can never know anything for certain? Or is this view just self-refuting? If all we know is nothing, how can we know that we know nothing? I do not believe this view is correct and for the purpose of this essay it will not be so.

  1. Tell me how youre conducting your search and Ill tell you what youre looking ...

    are not perfect and that the axioms that we invented could actually be not truthful, which would result in the 'garbage-in, garbage-out' scenario where because of the original axiom being false, all theorems based on this will also be false.

  2. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    Hence, it can be said to be a subjective or personal kind of knowledge. Finally, 20 between these two poles there is historical knowledge, regarded as a combination of both the former. Like in the Natural Sciences, the historian gathers information, for instance documents and accounts, and with the same rigour scrutinises his procedure and criticises his sources.

  1. Which is the more important attribute of the historians; the ability to analyse evidence ...

    Evidences do not speak for themselves and are only valuable when people use them. Using evidence, people can use scientific method to falsify previously established theses which would require the ability to analyse evidence scientifically, such maybe for example when the anti-Semitism originated from.

  2. Theory of Knowledge Essay -Discuss how using different methods of justification enables one to ...

    However, when it comes to ethics even though they differ from one person to the other and from one group to another, whenever an ethical claim is made I justify it using a different kind of logic than the one I use in maths, here I look if this ethical

  1. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). ...

    No one dismissed these claims basically because it suited them. One might then raise the knowledge issue whether a knower dismisses or accepts assertions because of the evidence or because of convenience. As far as the Human Sciences are concerned, evidence is not always to be found.

  2. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). ...

    Thus in matters of security and safety claims without evidence must be considered seriously, even though they may be tipoffs. Many knowledge claims that may not be able to be justified simply by reason or are not accepted by many people are dismissed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work