• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do we need to grow up in a human community in order to develop ways of knowing, or are we born "hard wired" to be able to use them? Is community more important in some ways of knowing than others?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do we need to grow up in a human community in order to develop ways of knowing? Sense perception, language, reason and emotion) Or are we born "hard wired" to be able to use them? Is community more important in some ways of knowing than others? Man is a social being, so it is very difficult to claim to be sure about the development of the ways of knowing in a completely detached from society human being, given that, since the beginning, technical problems arise within fields such as psychology as, according to the evidence of the US National Science Foundation, "humans have a more prolonged period of infant dependency than other species", and in order to survive, need their mother until the age of 10. This means that if the mother is not present, the baby dies, and if the mother is present, it therefore means that through the mother's experience (that is sure to have been built in a certain society for the reasons above) ...read more.

Middle

impact on this way of knowledge, since it creates language (and although humans have the potential ability to learn it, we are not born knowing any language, nor each individual creates its own language independent from everyone else's) We are born with sense perception and emotion, as a baby is susceptible to touch, can see, smell and taste, as well as it laughs and cries. However, these ways of knowing are developed depending on the community he/she is brought up in, or on its own personal context: This can be proven by the fact that the blind develop their other senses more acutely in order to be more conscious of their surroundings, or that in the community of knowers of psychologists that treat mentally ill people, their emotive perception is sharper in order to identify certain patterns of behavior or approach their patients with more delicacy. Reason can be said to have certain coherent steps that take you to a coherent conclusion. However, in practice, reason is based on our world-view and what is coherent within our knowledge, thus it is relative as our knowledge can be based on bad judgment and wrong second-hand knowledge taken as truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

With individual experience, one's reflection over it and ability to learn from it, one might develop good judgment; and by also developing self knowledge (having the courage to question our convictions), responsibility and intellectual humility, one can therefore obtain wisdom, attain great achievements, and consequently, through culture, his community of knowers makes progress by building on the accumulated achievements of past generation and nourish the community he was once determined by. As I mentioned before, the other ways of knowledge (sense perception, reason and emotion) take part in our individual acquisition of knowledge as we individually process the information that is given to us. Also, much of our knowledge is based on personal experience, we reason the facts in order to understand them, and many times we learn from our emotions. However, as language is the only "community way of knowledge" and the only predetermined one that is imposed by the outer world, this molds the other ways of knowledge, and is their basis. Humans grow up limited to their community's perspective of reality, who's frontiers are parallel to those of their own language (as language is their tool for describing their reality). Luc´┐Ża Uribe ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Oversimplication in the Ways of Knowing

    or through the senses (he or she has seen on a map that Washington D.C. is indeed the capital of the United States). Through perception, one can come to the conclusion that Washington D.C. is the capital of the United States.

  2. What is Gentleman? What are the characteristics of the Gentleman? Is it possible to ...

    The Master said 'The gentleman is no vessel!' [Book II.12, "Analects"]. It is the statement that shows one of the similarities between them. The word "vessel" means to be narrow and this statement means that "the gentleman" was not born as the gentleman, he becomes the gentleman. Moreover, it means that the gentleman is no specialist who is designed for a specific purpose only.

  1. People Need To Believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events

    We human beings cling to life through things we know and understand. But understandings and knowledge are ambiguous. The fact that there is right and wrong knowledge implies that those believing in the wrong knowledge are living with the wrong assumptions and things are out of the ordinary.

  2. Are some ways of knowing more likely to lead to truth than others?

    If you or I had been there at that time, the people would tell us that exact statement.

  1. TOK. "Truth is that to which the community ultimately settles down" (Charles Peirce). Analyse ...

    The idea of settling on truth is itself problematic because the term 'settles' is ambiguous. How do we know when a community has finished settling? A resting place along the road to truth need not be the destination. The community may be at a lull in its growth.

  2. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    is somewhat true, but not precise enough, whereas natural sciences have one correct answer and no other. In general, I am trying to prove that emotions can be explained in so many ways, that it is hard to get one exact answer.

  1. Are some ways of knowing more likely than others to lead to truth?

    sealed cave with no access to any human being, so it is unable to develop linguistic abilities. Would that baby be able to think? It certainly seems that such wouldn?t be possible because if he does not learn language, then he is not able to think, as language is what enables thought.

  2. Is it possible to justify the different ways of knowing?

    In the areas of Arts and Ethics, though emotion is considered by many to be the most important Way of Knowing, reason nevertheless plays a fundamental and essential role in these two areas of knowledge. In the Arts, reasoning is needed to allow us to make sense of the subject

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work