• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In areas of knowledge such as the arts and the sciences, do we learn more from works that follows or that breaks with accepted conventions?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In areas of knowledge such as the arts and the sciences, do we learn more from work that follows or that breaks with accepted conventions? The relationship between the arts and the sciences was described by Albert Einstein as "...being branches from the same tree." One normally does not equate these two areas of knowledge, as art is believed to be a creative form of communication, while science is about establishing one's findings through verifiable facts. Although, the aspect that brings these areas of knowledge together is that they both strive to teach or inform the observer of something that is already known (accepted conventions), or break what we believe to know. The question that arises from this is whether the observer learns more from these areas of knowledge when they follow, or when the break with accepted conventions. The fact is that we do learn from both teachings, although the question clearly states which we learn more from. I believe that if the arts or sciences follow or prove something we already know, it reinforces what we believe but might not teach us anymore than we already know. Although, when these areas of knowledge teach us something that breaks with accepted conventions, we learn more as it changes our outlook on the subject. ...read more.

Middle

People believed in this theory as it was advocated by the Christian churches and that there was no other theory to challenge it. This theory was finally disproven mainly in the 19th century through experiments conducted by Louis Pasteur. Pasteur's experiments indicated that microcosms were the actual cause of diseases. Although it was highly controversial when proposed as a theory, it is now the cornerstone of all medical research. This theory broke accepted conventions and has led to many important innovations such as antibiotics and hygienic practices. If spontaneous generation were still an accepted theory, medicinal science would not have progressed as far as it has come today. Not only have humans learned from the immediate experiments of the germ theory, but it had also led to other discoveries and understanding of the human body. Thus, humanity in general has learned more from the breaking of accepted conventions as it has permitted science to progress to a level much beyond where it begun. Moreover, in my opinion the arts are another example of how we have learned more from work that has broken accepted conventions. Art is an area of knowledge where creativity and innovation are not only promoted, but also expected. Fashion is an expression of ones self and is considered as an art form. ...read more.

Conclusion

We learn more from works that break accepted traditions as they help us gain knowledge of the world and "...recognize truths we were previously unaware of and reignite our sense of wonder in the world." (Theory of Knowledge - Richard van de Lagemaat). Thus, breaking accepted conventions in the form of art paintings helps us to gain knowledge of the painter's perspective on a certain issue while also helping us to identify the realities of life that we had not noticed before. In conclusion, it seems that works that break accepted conventions enable humanity to progress. We are able to learn more from these works as they go against what we believe to know and portray a new perspective that was either not thought of or was not proven. Although we do learn from works that follow accepted conventions as it reinforces our beliefs in that subject. The arts and the sciences are two very different forms of communicating ideas, although they both attempt to make sense of the world which gives the observer different perspectives of sometimes a similar situation. Thus, the arts and the sciences are complimentary areas of knowledge as arts give an inside look into a subject, while the sciences provide an outside look. Accepted conventions are meant to and should be broken in order for the progression of society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK - Accepted Conventions

    This essentially fulfills one of human nature's greatest desires: a need to belong. In addition, without universally accepted social conventions, tourists would quite often be misconstrued and unclear in their meaning, as customary beliefs and actions would be unknown to foreigners of a country.

  2. In Areas of Knowledge Such As the Arts and the Sciences, Do We Learn ...

    The Surrealist Movement, which started during the 1920's and lasted about two decades, had the intention of producing art with abstract images. They represented dreams, fantasies and even nightmares through their paintings by appealing to the viewer's emotion and ability to interpret what was shown.

  1. "In areas of knowledge such as the arts and the sciences, do we learn ...

    In my English and Theory of Knowledge classroom, it is very fascinating to see the variation of opinions and interpretations amongst every student willing to emancipate their opinions. When a teacher introduces a topic or question to the class, there are many viewpoints with most students concluding to similar reasoning.

  2. That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow. Consider knowledge issues ...

    It is often seen that if an argument contains two true premises then the argument itself is valid. It is an important point to note that the validity of an argument is independent of the truth of the premises it contains 2.

  1. Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the ...

    Society in those regions objected towards this on the basis of ethics, the banning of this work of art that is supposed to be an objective for future generations deprives others of this opportunity to gain knowledge. This piece of work was not taken with the same intention that the

  2. Ethical judgments limit the methods available in the production of knowledge in both the ...

    Would taking a dying form of art and reviving it in the society of the people who created it be ethically correct or incorrect? This, in one place, will give them employment, promote and package the product properly. And will alongside aid the local economy of the indigenous people.

  1. "That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." Consider some of ...

    According to this practice a widow, who was shunned by the Orthodox Hindu society, was considered a pure and chaste woman if she immolated herself on the pyre of her dead husband. This knowledge was deeply rooted in the minds of many sections of Hindu society to such an extent

  2. That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." Consider some of ...

    I want to explore the answers to these questions in the light of knowledge areas such as natural sciences and human sciences. Not long ago it was believed that life could be generated from dead matter. Scientists who believed in the theory of spontaneous generation gave many evidences, such as the growth of maggots in the decaying matter.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work