• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

People need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events (adapted from John Gray, Heresies, 2004). In what ways and to what extent would you say this claim is relevant in at least two areas of knowledge?

Extracts from this document...


"People need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events" (adapted from John Gray, Heresies, 2004). In what ways and to what extent would you say this claim is relevant in at least two areas of knowledge? In my essay I am going to discuss the importance of chaos and order in real life, and to what extent I agree with the title statement. The key concepts of this title is that belief is a necessity in perceiving order in chaotic events, and whether I approve or disapprove with this statement I shall evident my claim through two areas of knowledge. My claim is that belief is important to perceive order, and that it is necessary for people to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events, because the order is relying on the basis of belief and without believing the order will not be perceptible. This claim is relevant in all areas of knowledge as the chaos theory can be applied to all knowledge, but my main focus will primarily involve history and environmental science as my two areas of knowledge that will be viewed from perception and reason as my ways of knowing. ...read more.


The opposite of chaos is order, and as we are dealing with both chaos and order, I think that including the relevance of order could be beneficial to enhance our understanding further in this matter. Control, or in other words order, is something often discussed about when speaking of chaos theory, if I was to define chaos theory in my own words I would probably put it between determinism on one hand, which could predict everything, and having total chaos on the other hand, in the sense of not being able to predict anything at all. Therefore the chaos theory does consist of both prediction but also probability. So another approach or different aspect of this claim could be the regular muscle contractions of the heart, as the heart does not at all times deliver a perfect rhythm of heart beat. These middle grounds that the chaos theory is lying on can also known as the "ancient dichotomy" which refers to many ancient societies believing that the future is foreshadowed, but also that chance is a different major factor in our lives working simultaneously as predictions.5 Hence as a conclusion to the knowledge issue, I think a reasonable response would be that the attempt of scientific methods to establish truths are relevant to some extent depending majorly on what ...read more.


A theory can always be proved right or wrong with the right measures, but a prediction cannot be proved at all until after something is supposed to happen, consequently it is not possible to draw a clear line between facts and predictions in the past. There can be a lot of factors influencing a prediction, such as a subconscious mind, manipulation of thoughts etc. Evidently predictions can only be factual after and not before the happening. In my conclusion as a knower's perspective, I agree to the full extent with the title statement that people need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events, and by having used personal and factual examples I have tried to justify my standpoint and clarify my belief in why I argue for or against these claims. Without our belief we cannot identify order persistently, our belief is the main key for us to focus on the order rather than the chaos that future brings us. If we do not learn to exhibit our needs in believing then we cannot adapt to our lives and subsist in comfort, in general it is simple to recognize this belief, we live with it and accept it, because we know nothing about tomorrow's future, yet we hope to find peace and subtle living conditions that will keep us happy as a human being and race. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. The knowledge that we value the most is the knowledge for which we can ...

    Strong justifications so far seem to make certain knowledge more reliable than others. However there are also justifications for knowledge that may seem to be strong but can in fact be quite weak. Justifications based on perception are an example.

  2. Doubt is the key to knowledge (Persian Proverb). To what extent is this true ...

    Doubts about discovering United States of America, researchers said that the Australians were the first people who stepped into America, others said Indians existed before Australians, but on the other hand when Christopher Columbus discovered America and found that the Indians were there he concluded that his doubt was right

  1. "There can be no Knowledge without emotion...until we have felt the force of this ...

    If scientists were not driven by passion, curiosity and hope emotions, they would surely not spend enormous sums of money and time on Mars explorations. Without the powerful urge to know if there is life beyond our planet, we would not hear of so many investigations of this kind in the outer space.

  2. To what extent can knowledge produced by history and science be used to foretell ...

    The prediction that Paul the octopus will be able to predict the future of the game is based on a historical event that had happened previously, but it does not mean that it is 100 percent correct, in fact, it cannot be proven correct until the end of the game, where there is a clear winner.

  1. To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas ...

    be that you shouldn't rely on reason too much because you might lose sight of the bigger picture. After contemplating this point I've come to the conclusion that it's important to engage the creative and emotional aspects of the mind; because without learning from others through language our reason would be insufficient for logical conclusions.

  2. TOK. Consider the extent to which complete certainty might be achievable in mathematics and ...

    Seeing what can?t be seen 2. Being seen by the seen 3. Seeing what you want see. Scientists tend to concentrate on objects that can?t be seen, and tend to have different views of the matter. Secondly, the subject might know that he/she is being watch end and might tend

  1. Free Will and Determinism

    On the other hand, a believer in free will would say that the man is guilty due to his free decision to choose from his wife or the prostitute. With that being said, ethical implications could lead to arguments on whether or not an individual?s actions are just according to how much the populace believes in free will or determinism.

  2. "That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow." Consider some of ...

    Another example that draws my attention to the knowledge issue is man?s long-term belief in old knowledge pertaining to digestive disorders. It was commonly believed that peptic ulcers were caused by stress and heavy intake of spicy foods and alcohol.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work