• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

People need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events (adapted from John Gray, Heresies, 2004). In what ways and to what extent would you say this claim is relevant in at least two areas of knowledge?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"People need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events" (adapted from John Gray, Heresies, 2004). In what ways and to what extent would you say this claim is relevant in at least two areas of knowledge? In my essay I am going to discuss the importance of chaos and order in real life, and to what extent I agree with the title statement. The key concepts of this title is that belief is a necessity in perceiving order in chaotic events, and whether I approve or disapprove with this statement I shall evident my claim through two areas of knowledge. My claim is that belief is important to perceive order, and that it is necessary for people to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events, because the order is relying on the basis of belief and without believing the order will not be perceptible. This claim is relevant in all areas of knowledge as the chaos theory can be applied to all knowledge, but my main focus will primarily involve history and environmental science as my two areas of knowledge that will be viewed from perception and reason as my ways of knowing. ...read more.

Middle

The opposite of chaos is order, and as we are dealing with both chaos and order, I think that including the relevance of order could be beneficial to enhance our understanding further in this matter. Control, or in other words order, is something often discussed about when speaking of chaos theory, if I was to define chaos theory in my own words I would probably put it between determinism on one hand, which could predict everything, and having total chaos on the other hand, in the sense of not being able to predict anything at all. Therefore the chaos theory does consist of both prediction but also probability. So another approach or different aspect of this claim could be the regular muscle contractions of the heart, as the heart does not at all times deliver a perfect rhythm of heart beat. These middle grounds that the chaos theory is lying on can also known as the "ancient dichotomy" which refers to many ancient societies believing that the future is foreshadowed, but also that chance is a different major factor in our lives working simultaneously as predictions.5 Hence as a conclusion to the knowledge issue, I think a reasonable response would be that the attempt of scientific methods to establish truths are relevant to some extent depending majorly on what ...read more.

Conclusion

A theory can always be proved right or wrong with the right measures, but a prediction cannot be proved at all until after something is supposed to happen, consequently it is not possible to draw a clear line between facts and predictions in the past. There can be a lot of factors influencing a prediction, such as a subconscious mind, manipulation of thoughts etc. Evidently predictions can only be factual after and not before the happening. In my conclusion as a knower's perspective, I agree to the full extent with the title statement that people need to believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events, and by having used personal and factual examples I have tried to justify my standpoint and clarify my belief in why I argue for or against these claims. Without our belief we cannot identify order persistently, our belief is the main key for us to focus on the order rather than the chaos that future brings us. If we do not learn to exhibit our needs in believing then we cannot adapt to our lives and subsist in comfort, in general it is simple to recognize this belief, we live with it and accept it, because we know nothing about tomorrow's future, yet we hope to find peace and subtle living conditions that will keep us happy as a human being and race. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. TOK notes. The problem of knowledge There are three ...

    Eye-witness testimony - single eye-witnesses are unreliable since they tend to commit perceptual errors and the element of time plays a major role as well. Distinguishing appearance from reality Perception causes problems since: We may misinterpret what we see We may fail to notice something We may misremember what we

  2. People Need To Believe that order can be glimpsed in the chaos of events

    Natural scientists seek to find answers and explain questions regarding biology, physics and chemistry.1 This urge to find the answers and finding further knowledge in the sciences implies, not in a too vague way, that not knowing and understanding would make us uncomfortable and unrest which would in this case represent chaos in us.

  1. For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view ...

    It is here that we encounter the "Problem of Induction", first introduced by David Hume in the mid-18th century and further explored by Karl Popper two centuries later. This problem calls into question all empirical claims made in everyday life or through the scientific method.

  2. To what extent are areas of knowledge shaped by their past? Consider with reference ...

    Instead, all mathematical knowledge must have a rigorous proof that uses reason alone to delineate how it arises logically from axioms which are more or less universally accepted. Thus, accepted mathematical knowledge has an objectivity that is unmatched by any other area of knowledge and this means that the same

  1. That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow. Consider knowledge issues ...

    old in house servant Hemraj which happened on 15-16 May 2008 in the Indian town of Noida. Bharti, the family?s housemaid was usually received by Hemraj. However on Friday morning, Hemraj who lived in the same house, separated by a wall, hadn?t come to receive her .

  2. TOK. Consider the extent to which complete certainty might be achievable in mathematics and ...

    to act differently towards the observer and might result into false observations. Thirdly, scientists may decide some of their observations based on what they want to see, which is of course biased. So if all these factors affect the certainty of an observation, how can you be certain of the subject and its observations which are assumed to be true?

  1. TOK Essay - Can we trust reason in the pursuit of knowledge? Consider 2 ...

    as being expression of anger on Pollock?s part since the brushstrokes are quick and aggressive as evidenced from the huge splash marks made by the drips. One could also reason that the use of colors suggests a certain mood, perhaps excitement and confusion.

  2. Doubt is the key to knowledge ( Persian Proverb ). To what extent is ...

    Philosophers and scientists are always drenched in doubt. It is uncommon to allow any theories to pass unchallenged. Be it the Babylonians, who thought that the earth was hollow, or the Egyptians, who thought it to be square - all the claims had to be justified and proved by factual evidence backed by sound reasoning; but above all, only because someone somewhere doubted the claim.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work