• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reason and emotions in justifying moral decision

Extracts from this document...


Reason and emotions in justifying moral decision Reason and emotion are both assumed to be the ways of knowledge required in justifying moral decisions. This essay will explore the knowledge issue of reason and emotion being equally necessary and important in justifying moral decisions. Reason is a way of knowing that involves different elements. It is also embracing the rationalist approach, where we can ascertain truth by thinking and the process of reflection alone. The use of reason is a way of extending our knowledge from known facts. One of the roles traditionally attributed to reason is to find balance or equilibrium between two extremes. In a very general sense, reasoning is a collective endeavour by which people construct meaning together by exchanging, modifying and improving their ideas and opinions. The use of formal logic, the study of form in argument irrespective of the subject matter, is required in reasoning. There are two types of logic being used here: deductive logic and inductive logic. Deductive logic involves giving the truth of some information, where the conclusion must also be true. One example is the following statements, A: all humans are mortal. ...read more.


The major emphasis here is how we know or justify what you ought to do. To do so, we can use reason or emotion as a way of knowledge to justify our actions. When using reason to justify a moral judgement, there may be separate reasons for people to have an argument. If it is based in fact, the argument is open to settlement by evidence, though the evidence may be very difficult to obtain and interpret. However, if it is based in principle, it is very hard to use evidence to solve the dispute as everyone's principle differs from each other. Making such a distinction is important as arguments of principle and arguments of evidence are solved differently. Thus, morality may come down to just a personal opinion. In this case, the prospects of finding the' correct' form of morality are and trying to persuade someone that one course of action is 'morally better' than the other, is like trying to convince them that apple taste better than oranges. After making a vital distinction between principle and evidence, the choice of premises when justifying a moral judgement is also equally important. ...read more.


She reasons that if she tells the teacher, she will be living up to her morals, but her if she does, she will fail the test and she will be upset. In this case, reason and emotions are both factors that will contribute to her moral judgement. In the end, the student decides to tell the teacher of her error as she felt that it was logical and 'morally right' to do so. Although she failed the test, she had a net gain of happiness as the teacher had praised her for being an honest student. Reason and emotion are both equally necessary in justifying a moral decision. Utilitarian, duty-based and virtue-based theories of ethics all rely on both reasons and emotions to differing degrees. Each system has its own flaws and despite the reams of profound books we can turn to, we will still be doubtful if any of these systems will pose severe difficulties and if a compelling theory would arise. However, theories are only 'guidebooks' and do not make a moral decision as this is what humans do. As it is hard for a human not to have any emotions, justifying a moral decision would require both the use of reasoning and our emotions play a role in decided what we 'feel' like doing. 1573 words ?? ?? ?? ?? 3 http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/framework.html 1 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-inductive/#1 2 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotion ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Knowledge and Emotions

    The question however, should be whether Bennett's claim holds any relevance to valued knowledge. If the knowledge being pursued by the knower has significance to the person then wouldn't it result in a certain degree of emotional response? Despite some knowledge having no emotion connected to it, I believe that

  2. Free essay


    This shows that emotional reasons cannot actually help justify a decision one has to use reason too. Even in places where one is not emotionally attached to a person, both, reason and emotion are required to justify a decision. Take the example of law in the area of human sciences.

  1. Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

    So long as we take into account any objections from ourselves or others and resolve those, decisions made by consensus satisfy both emotion and logic without contradicting one or the other. This is the ideal. This tells us that both reason and emotion are necessary for this process.

  2. TOK essay Inductive logic is one of the ...

    are not explicit, clear and sensitive enough, it would easily cause a hasty generalization. If he says that a four-legged, furred animal is a dog, so all four-legged, furred animals are dogs, he would be mistaken. Also, if he saw a dog having three legs due to a traffic accident, he would hesitate to label it as a dog.

  1. Are Reason and Emotion Equally Neccessary in Justifying Moral Decisions?

    In this case, reason plays a greater part in justifying a moral decision. Meanwhile, Rodrigue's emotions appear to make him susceptible by delaying his in retrieving the honour of his name and preventing him from feeling any pride once the act is committed.

  2. What are the differences between "I am certain" and "it is certain", and is ...

    This requires experimental method to prove new concepts. They are operationalized by specifying the observations that will distinguish their referents, by subjecting them to controlled experiments, and by trying to find results that are maximally independent of place, time, observer or means of observation. Moreover, subjective interpretation is minimized by formalization of the theories and concepts.

  1. Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

    In war, the ultimate way of pitting humanity against humanity, moral decisions are either extremely dominant or completely ignored thus this provides an excellent subject of investigation. The politics behind war, such as strategic offenses and defenses as well as motives for the war itself, can either be extremely selfish or completely selfless.

  2. Are reason and emotion equal in justifying moral decisions?

    decide never to be a polygamist due to all the negative experiences endured by him in his polygamist family. For the first decision, emotion influenced emotion as the parents? beliefs influenced the child?s conscience whilst for the latter decision, the child?s decision was influenced by experience which involves reason and emotion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work