• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Science Essay TOK

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Alex Kluivert Theory of Knowledge I IB 4 March 2009 Facts vs. Facts Henri Poincare once said that "Science is built of facts the way a house is built of bricks: but an accumulation of facts is no more science than a pile of bricks is a house", this is a very interesting quote that one could derive many meanings from. The first thing that the quote shows is that there is more to science then just a random jumble of facts. It also poses the question that if science is built on facts yet facts do not always make up science, is there more than one type of fact? People certainly use the term fact loosely. Many times you will hear someone say that this is a historical fact, or this is a scientific fact. Is there a difference between these two? Yes, there is a huge difference, if one is to believe in a correspondent society the empirical truths of science should always come before the truths of history. Yet this is not always the case. ...read more.

Middle

The quote says that science is more than and jumble of facts. This is true. To use the analogy given in the quote, if you want to build a house you will not only need the materials such as bricks, but you also must have plans or blueprints. In science the bricks are facts and the blueprints are the scientific method. This is a universal method that gives the steps for finding a scientific truth. It is true that facts supply the building materials for science but the scientific method supplies the plans for it to be built. History has some problems when it goes up against science in questions of facts. The first problem is histories rankings on the correspondence truth ladder. As long as we can not go back in time history can never be tested. This excludes the empirical truth test from histories arsenal. Without this test it cannot match up with science. At best I could see a logic claim for a historical fact. ...read more.

Conclusion

After a crime takes place forensic scientists will use historical evidence to create the probable physical features of the criminal. Then forensic specialists can use any DNA found at the crime to run tests and get more specific data on the criminal. However sometimes in these cases the scientific evidence disputes the conclusions drawn from historical facts. In these cases the forensic science is always believed over the historical conclusions. One example is in the case of the serial killer in Baton Rouge, past serial killers tended to be white men in there twenties and thirties, however when the DNA sequencing was run it turns out that they were looking for a black man. When this information arose the forensic scientists were correct and the killer was apprehended. History and science can both have facts so when head to head which fact is right? I would have to say that science is the victor. It is important to have a class system within these facts in the future when problems arise. If there was a universally believed system then there would be no disputes in the subjects of abortion, evolution, or any other of these questionable topics. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Matrix Essay; Red v.s Blue Pil?

    The only decision you will be able to make for yourself is when you are in the "real world" and if you want to plug in temporarily or not. There is one final very dominant reason influencing my choice to take the blue pill over the red pill.

  2. ToK Essay What similarities and differences are there between historical and scientific explanations?

    A scientific formula doesn't change because the nature of the world is something constant, unlike history. History is changing every day, yet the course of history can be changed by the development of new technologies. An example of this is the use of steroids.

  1. ToK: "Science is built of facts, the way a house is built of bricks.."

    What distinguishes History from the other areas of knowledge is that in History you should not apply only the usual scientific method - you can't make experiments, you can't test. You should use your logical ability of interpretation by all means in order really to appreciate what was the significance

  2. Tok essay 2009

    Entonces el conocimiento que cada sujeto tome del objeto ser� diferente para cada uno de los sujetos que observen un mismo objeto, es decir tendr�n una imagen distinta en funci�n de la percepci�n que cada uno realice sobre el objeto.

  1. Science is built of facts the way a house is built of bricks: but ...

    does a brick contain the imagination of the scientist used for coming up with the idea of why the fact has occurred in the first place?

  2. TOK: Science and History

    It is imprecise to a point, but it ends up being useful beyond doubt, as the global idea is always there. However this global idea is often what people who were influencing History wanted us to think. An easy example would be, that if we did not know details about

  1. Science and an accumulation of facts -TOK essay

    For example,I always thought the earth was flat when I was young until I questioned my parents about the truth of my thoughts. My thinking process immediately changed after their explanation of the earth being spherical. I began to imagine and think of things differently!

  2. As an IB student, how has your learning of literature and science contributed to ...

    Reading the autobiography of Hitler we can understand his ideology and his role as a Fuhrer in the Nazi society. We can understand the reasons that urged the Germans to worship him. By reading the book, Schindler?s List we can feel the horrors and uncertainties of life of the Jews that were incarcerated in the concentration camps.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work