• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The historians task is to understand the past the human scientist, by contrast, is looking to change the future. Is this true?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?The historian?s task is to understand the past; the human scientist, by contrast, is looking to change the future.? To what extent is this true in these areas of knowledge? By. ------ ---------- The oxford dictionary defines History as ?The whole series of past events connected with a particular person or thing?1. Whilst Human science is defined as ''The study and interpretation of the experiences, activities, constructs, and artifacts associated with human beings'' 2.Many arguments have been made to whether history could be regarded as a human science. Some say that History is indeed a human science merely due to it's use of past events for references of the present. Whilst others disagree because, unlike human sciences, history cannot observe the past. Instead it searches for evidence historians engage in to study the past human events. In this essay I will be analyzing to what extent the statement ?The historian?s task is to understand the past; the human scientist, by contrast, is looking to change the future.? is true. History is an area of knowledge that depends on a blend of both the truth and understanding. ...read more.

Middle

Another example would the way historians scrutinized the black plague. By looking into the housing of people who were affected by the disease they were able to discover a link between rats and the illness. By knowing the source of the bubonic plague, scientists were able to find a cure. This discovery then helped prevent future diseases as people became less affected by it. Commoners and nobles knew that rats were the cause of this and thus were able to apply prevention techniques to their own homes. In comparison, the human sciences rely on both logical understanding and ability to make reliable predictions. Examples of subjects that are part of the human sciences include anthropology, psychology, economics and geography. By formulating theories to predict human behavior, human scientists then develop solutions for the problems identified by those behaviors. The malthusian theory , for example, shows that the human population grows at an exponential rate while food supplies grow at an arithmetic rate. Populations, therefore, will outgrow their food supplies and either famine, disease, or wars will bring the population back down again 3. ...read more.

Conclusion

This response to legitimate authority is learned in a variety of situations, for example in the family, school and workplace' 5. This discovery was not only useful in determining how people were influenced into committing atrocities during the world war, but also succeeded in portraying how human behavior can be altered by another human being who stands as an authority figure. The statement ?The historian?s task is to understand the past; the human scientist, by contrast, is looking to change the future.? can be seen as a true statement for the two areas of knowledge. Historians do often explore previous events to help them understand the past. Whilst Human Scientists seek to make theories and experiments which would help them 'change the future'. However Historians often make observations which can affect the future. The observations made on the Black Plague for example, helped us develop cures to prevent it. Also, human scientists can choose ro move away from looking to 'change the future', for example philosophers may choose to instead better understand the current human behaviors. In conclusion, it is not fair to label an area of knowledge with only one task. These two areas of knowledge explore many different things and giving them only one task would simply not allow them to reach their optimum potential. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    When the interpretations no longer are valid, the conclusions derived from them can no longer be justified. But does this imply that historical knowledge is useless, since it is only temporary? No, 70 certainly not. After all, history does not only depict past times, it is also a mirror of

  2. Capital Punishment and why it should be abolished, with particular regard to the Human ...

    Furthermore since 1973, 123 prisoners in 25 US states have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence. If capital punishment is not abolished and there are innocent people convicted, there are no possible ways of compensating them for this miscarriage of justice.

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    Today, we use this saying in the present, but it originated from a time period much before us in the past, thus affecting the future. Thus, our approach to knowledge about the future is partly based on the past creating a similarity in the difference.

  2. A historian must combine the rigour of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    But, history involves humans all of who interpret what they read differently. If you are learning about a certain aspect of history, where you live will effect what type of information you get. If you are from France you will learn about the French revolution differently then someone who lives in France.

  1. A historian must combine the rigor of the scientist with the imagination of the ...

    happened as a result of an event occurring, based on any evidence they have. Both reason and perception play a key role here. Reasoning, by using their previous knowledge to infer about what is to happen, and perception, by interpreting things, giving them a meaning and stemming out opinions.

  2. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    which may have a direct and far reaching impact on the future but we may and we do choose to rebuff all such attempts to face reality. That is specially so when we start relying on the language of horoscopes, fuse it with a clouded perspective and try to reach a logical conclusion.

  1. Which is the more important attribute of the historians; the ability to analyse evidence ...

    the evidence scientifically (the same reason why we give a special noun "scientists" to people who uses scientific methods), so, the people who possess these techniques and skills are called "historians". Of course, I am not saying historians cannot possess the ability to develop interpretation of evidence using creative imagination;

  2. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    The way we approach the knowledge and the technology used plays a role in how flawed or flawless the knowledge is. Nowadays the technology is advanced and is improving everyday which makes the process of preserving evidence and approaching the knowledge of the past and future easier.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work