• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Language Instinct - theories of Pinker and Chomsky

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Language: A Divergence of Instinct and Knowing Including an Analysis of Chapters 1-4 Rishi Seshadri TOK 5/2/13 Word Count: 1167 Pinker outlines his argument: ?Language is a distinct piece of the biological makeup of our brains. Language is a complex, specialized skill, which develops in the child spontaneously, without conscious effort or formal instruction, is deployed without awareness of its underlying logic, is qualitatively the same in every individual and is distinct from more general abilities to process information or behave intelligently.? He claims cognitive scientists describe it as psychological faculty, mental organ, neural system, and a computational mode, he prefers the term ?instinct.? Pinker?s two main arguments are the infinite variety of sentence combinations and utterings and the lack of formalized instruction in very young children. He supports Chomsky?s view that language is an evolutionary adaptation. In the third chapter, Pinker dissects the issue of linguistic determinism and criticizes the work of Whorf and his language studies. He suggests that one cannot use language to think because its ambiguous, it lacks logical explicitness, co-referencing issues muddle it, and the use of deictic terms. ...read more.


We can imagine a thought that is not communicated, or that is not expressed in language, but we cannot imagine one that could not be communicated. When you are not sure how to express yourself, that means you have a half-formed thought, or a vague thought, not a crisply-defined thought that defies expression. With this in mind, it is interesting to look at the examples that Pinker uses to argue for the primacy of thought over language. For most thought, the medium of communication is language. But more primitive behavior can communicate very simple thoughts. This is what is happening in the example of a baby looking surprised when it sees one object suddenly turn into two. Pinker seems to imply that the baby is not just thinking "wow!", but something more sophisticated, such as "I assume that things don't split into two like that, but this sense data is inconsistent with my assumption. I must look more closely." These sentences may be related to what is in a good cognitive science model of the baby's behavior, but to say the baby is actually thinking this is silly. ...read more.


Meanings belong, according to the universal grammar thesis, to a deep semantic structure while sounds belong to a surface phonological structure; and what connects the two are syntactic rules. Secondly, he presents the view that essential idea that such a system is both required by all human languages, and acquired too quickly by human individuals to be accounted for by a range of cultural, social or environmental stimuli. It seems that every sentence must exist in some ready-made form before it can go through some transformational process. However, this account seems to miss a key aspect of language production: that most sentences develop in time. While a well formed sentence may be reverse-engineered into its constituent parts, it seems unlikely that this is how such sentences are always generated in the first place. This view, in a sense, misses the key aspect of absurdity in language. Humans do not consider the vast implications of their words, neither do they consider the grammatical constituents that form the basis of language. There is a sense of randomness present in language. Moreover, the extent to which randomness or instinct plays in the individual's use of language is even greater than one's understanding of language. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. "...we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    However, even though there is a problem when extending the knowledge gained from novels, one can gain the notion of culture through it. My teacher in Swedish during my 9th year of schooling said that "behind every book is a man, behind the man is a culture, and behind the

  2. Problems With Interpreting Meaning. What do the problems with interpreting meaning discussed by ...

    This is one example of how private mental images could form the basis of both the many understandings and the many misunderstandings of social life ( 1). Van de Lagemaat's fourth and final theory of meaning is the meaning as know-how theory.

  1. we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Charis : So, for example, when someone is happy, they smile and we as the knower knows that they are happy and we also know that they are sad or angry when they frown. Therefore, what people do and how people act is what is summed up as personality, no?

  2. we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    of human nature that have already been described in novels and poetry. There are numerous works of literature that bring us characters and personalities, in which we manage to find ourselves, to experience pains and worries so familiar to us, and eventually to find new perspectives, giving us better insight to things that seemed unclear before.

  1. Does Language Determine or Limit Thought?

    around them.8 Therefore, we cannot express feelings and convey messages without language as a form of language is required to achieve this. Some think language is the main means of thought, as we think with language and communicate using it.

  2. We will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Try not to confuse the emotional content of a novel with the novelist himself.) about a particular topic or situation, which, once understood by the reader, will allow the reader to empathize and feel it as well. Novels explore the depth and variety of human consciousness; they exemplify our individuality and uniqueness; which is what scientific psychology fails to do.

  1. Are the WOKS controlled by language?

    The shape of a wave is just many points in two-dimension that together forms the shape of the wave. And the waves change in time. This is just a simple example, if you examine all the concepts we have, you will find that they are but made of a few very fundamental concepts.

  2. Does language determine or limit thought?

    (zettel ´┐Ż413)5. Language can limit thought in the way that it can be used to abolish thoughts and ideas. An example of this is Orwell's book "Nineteen Eighty-Four". In the book, the official language spoken in Oceania is "Newspeak" which is a version of the English language.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work