• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Language Instinct - theories of Pinker and Chomsky

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Language: A Divergence of Instinct and Knowing Including an Analysis of Chapters 1-4 Rishi Seshadri TOK 5/2/13 Word Count: 1167 Pinker outlines his argument: ?Language is a distinct piece of the biological makeup of our brains. Language is a complex, specialized skill, which develops in the child spontaneously, without conscious effort or formal instruction, is deployed without awareness of its underlying logic, is qualitatively the same in every individual and is distinct from more general abilities to process information or behave intelligently.? He claims cognitive scientists describe it as psychological faculty, mental organ, neural system, and a computational mode, he prefers the term ?instinct.? Pinker?s two main arguments are the infinite variety of sentence combinations and utterings and the lack of formalized instruction in very young children. He supports Chomsky?s view that language is an evolutionary adaptation. In the third chapter, Pinker dissects the issue of linguistic determinism and criticizes the work of Whorf and his language studies. He suggests that one cannot use language to think because its ambiguous, it lacks logical explicitness, co-referencing issues muddle it, and the use of deictic terms. ...read more.


We can imagine a thought that is not communicated, or that is not expressed in language, but we cannot imagine one that could not be communicated. When you are not sure how to express yourself, that means you have a half-formed thought, or a vague thought, not a crisply-defined thought that defies expression. With this in mind, it is interesting to look at the examples that Pinker uses to argue for the primacy of thought over language. For most thought, the medium of communication is language. But more primitive behavior can communicate very simple thoughts. This is what is happening in the example of a baby looking surprised when it sees one object suddenly turn into two. Pinker seems to imply that the baby is not just thinking "wow!", but something more sophisticated, such as "I assume that things don't split into two like that, but this sense data is inconsistent with my assumption. I must look more closely." These sentences may be related to what is in a good cognitive science model of the baby's behavior, but to say the baby is actually thinking this is silly. ...read more.


Meanings belong, according to the universal grammar thesis, to a deep semantic structure while sounds belong to a surface phonological structure; and what connects the two are syntactic rules. Secondly, he presents the view that essential idea that such a system is both required by all human languages, and acquired too quickly by human individuals to be accounted for by a range of cultural, social or environmental stimuli. It seems that every sentence must exist in some ready-made form before it can go through some transformational process. However, this account seems to miss a key aspect of language production: that most sentences develop in time. While a well formed sentence may be reverse-engineered into its constituent parts, it seems unlikely that this is how such sentences are always generated in the first place. This view, in a sense, misses the key aspect of absurdity in language. Humans do not consider the vast implications of their words, neither do they consider the grammatical constituents that form the basis of language. There is a sense of randomness present in language. Moreover, the extent to which randomness or instinct plays in the individual's use of language is even greater than one's understanding of language. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Does Language Determine or Limit Thought?

    quote, 'The limits of my language mean the limits of my world', supports this theory in saying thoughts are determined in language so our thoughts are limited to the frame that language provides us.10 If the Sapir-Whorf theory states that language determines thought, then how come sometimes we have a

  2. Tok Chap 1-3

    Levels of Knowledge * Much of what we claim to "know" is second-hand knowledge that we have acquired from other people and do not understand in any great detail. * Children who ask "why?" are irritating because they bring to light the superficial nature of our understanding.

  1. we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Tu Bao : Yes, I agree. Novels and scientific psychology basically portray both human life and personality. But it also bugs me that, to what extent can we gain reliable knowledge of human personality and human life through these two mediums?

  2. We will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    I believe your use of the word emotion is misplaced. You would be better off using the word "consciousness" instead. Scientific psychology attempts to reach a conclusion through reason. The way scientific psychologists use two methods to reach a conclusion; they observe patterns of human behavior and tendencies, establish a

  1. Belief System or not?

    The most important and conclusive fact is that Buddhists do not clearly follow the teachings of a specific deity. Many would (wrongly) say that it is clearly the worship of Buddha that is the focal point, while in fact, Buddha is not one entity, but the idea of an elevated

  2. "...we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    Then, to what extent can we gain reliable knowledge of personality through these media? The fictional descriptions of personality in literature are subject to a great deal of subjectivity. As a novel is in most cases a non-scrutinized work by a single person that can have a very broad range of characteristics according to the novels sub-genre.

  1. Problems With Interpreting Meaning. What do the problems with interpreting meaning discussed by ...

    When one wants to understand the meaning of 'circle,' a dictionary can give an exact definition, such as: a set of points equidistant from a single point within a plane. Since mathematics is concerned with numbers and special configurations, an exact definition is required, and thus, this theory is perfectly applicable to the area of knowledge of mathematics.

  2. we will always learn more about human life and human personality from novels than ...

    "Everywhere I go I find that a poet has been there before me," said Sigmund Freud.1 This quote demonstrates the close relationship between scientific psychology and fictional literature. Part of what psychologists have achieved over the years is that they have managed to set patterns and give explanations for aspects

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work