• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theory of Knowledge Essay

Extracts from this document...


Theory of Knowledge Essay "In order to find out how things really are, one must understand teh filters through which one percieves the world." Discuss and evaluate this statement. The first thing to do when trying to understand and evaluate this statement is to appreciate the different angles from which it can be seen. The first and most obvious thing to do is to take a closer look at the terminology. It is necessary to examine the key words - in this case above all the expressions "really", "filters" and "perception". After doing this, the statement as a whole needs to be examined, and it needs to be clarified to what extent it can be considered true. The first terms to define and clarify are "perception" and "filters". Perception can be defined as "The procession of outside information, taken up by the five senses (seeing, hearing, feeling, smelling, tasting) and sent to the brain in the form of electrical impulses, where this information, in conjunction with the personal experience of the person, creates an image of the outside world." When looking at this definition it becomes clear that there are already three main filters in the process of perception alone: the fice senses, the conversion into electrical impulses and the personal experience of the percieving person. ...read more.


All the noises around us for example melt into one - we don't distinguish between all the diffenrent cars, we just hear traffic. The difference to the scientific filters is that we can percieve them consciously when concentrating on it. This has been found out by neurologists (e.g. Dr Darold Treffert) studying the phenomenon of "savants" (people with extrodinary abilities, such as calculating logarithms in the head or remembering the weather of a random day four years ago) - people in this condition do not process this information sub-consciously, but consciously and are thus overwhelmed by the information arriving in their brain. On top of these scientific filters of information there are also cultural ones. Stereotyping is a good example for this. Stereotyping - putting people into categories - takes away our objectivity and thus reduces the amount of consciously taken up information further. For example when meeting an American tourist, having the prejudice of Americans being not intellectual and having an over-confident view on their own abilities, one might be apprehensive towards this American, not consciously noticing good qualities in him, but rather concentrate on the bad ones. ...read more.


As it has been discussed earlier, perception is extremely prone to mistakes and subjectivity - as perception is a part of the process of reasoning, it must thus be said that reason itself is prone to mistakes and subjectivity too. Thus the concept of using reason to overcome the weaknesses of perception becomes a paradox, because reason itself requires a certain amount of perception, just as perception requires a certain amount of reason ("To gaze is to think", Salvatore Dal´┐Ż). What good is trying to find a reality beyond our own, if we are more than likely to never be able to grasp it anyway? If we consider the cultural and mental aspect, those that we can alter when concentrating on it, it is actually essential. Understanding between different cultures can only be achieved by the acceptance of both sides that one's own perception of reality is not objective, and does not necessarily be as real for everyone else. In conclusion to all this it becomes clear that although the statement itself contains a paradox, it also carries the important message of a non-existent universal reality, whose acceptance is vital for inter-personal and inter-cultural understanding. Words: 1482 ?? ?? ?? ?? Theory of Knowledge Katharina Ziegeler August 2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. There can be no knowledge without emotion until we have felt the force ...

    Most, if not all, ethical situations have an emotive base and thus, give rise to controversial issues such as biasness, etc. We can even take an example in one of the areas of knowledge, for instance, history; history is knowledge that is supposed to be absolutely factual, that is supposed

  2. "There can be no Knowledge without emotion...until we have felt the force of this ...

    Contrarily, since I aspire to become a neuroscientist, I do care about these precise mechanisms.

  1. TOK: Emotion as a Filter to Knowledge

    You may, for example, get the intuition that someone is staring at you behind you and when you do turn around there is some doing exactly so! But this is not reliable as there are times when you turn around and there is no one there!

  2. Coherence Essay

    Unfortunately, these truth tests are not above abuse. To begin with, even empirical tests cannot be considered the ultimate truth. Hitler and his hoard of scientists believed that they had scientific proof that the Aryan race truly was superior to all other races.

  1. Theory of Knowledge Essay

    but in usual people experience the same things but the sense of perception has another element, it is the interpretation. What we sense (smell, sight, sound), we usually interrupt in different ways, that is why we each have a unique view of the world.

  2. Theory of Knowledge Essay on Choices in the World ...

    We choose what features to draw on our map. Homo Sapiens Sapiens, however, is a creature wrought by merciless Nature to fulfil a task, and that task alone: to survive in the Savannah. That the skills evolved for outwitting various predators and prey are any use for anything but hunting/gathering

  1. Hebraism and Hellenism by Matthew Arnold. Applying Arnold's analysis to modern day America.

    If we didn?t play well then we would run. If you don?t follow Gods word then you will be punished. For as often as Hebraism is shown in the Bible, Hellenism is shown in Greek literature. The Greeks believed more in thinking. Some of the greatest thinkers in the world were Greek such as Socrates or Plato.

  2. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better it is. Discuss.

    Therefore, if a theory can be falsifiable, it is better in terms of credence, accuracy and objectivity. And its falsifiability symbolizes its position in the field of science, differed from pseudo-science. It is about ?drawing a line?. This problem was named by Karl the ?problem of demarcation.? Also, since falsifiability

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work