• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theory of Knowledge Essay -Discuss how using different methods of justification enables one to reach conclusions in ethics that can be supported just the same as those conclusions provided in mathematics

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Discuss how using different methods of justification enables one to reach conclusions in ethics that can be supported just the same as those conclusions provided in mathematics By: Mariam Jamjoom Ms. Mahalia The two Areas of Knowledge (AOK) discussed here are Mathematics and Ethics where reaching conclusions and justification are the linking issues. Defining the key terms is an essential part in order to fully understand the question. According to Oxford Dictionary Ethics is "a set of moral principles, especially ones relating to or affirming a specified group, field, or form of conduct" and Mathematics is "the abstract science of number, quantity, and space either as abstract concepts (pure mathematics), or as applied to other disciplines such as physics and engineering (applied mathematics)". Methods of justification also need to be defined to be able to link conclusions found in ethics and mathematics to one another. The four different Ways of Knowing (WOK) which are emotion, reason, sense perception and language can help us understand conclusions made in ethics and mathematics. However, in order to be able to justify those conclusions we need different types of justification methods in order to do so. ...read more.

Middle

with my own religion and what I have been raised to believe, only then can I claim that this ethical example is a logical one when it comes to my opinion. I noticed that when I defined logic when it come sot both subjects I used deductive reasoning because I looked at the theory first then confirmed it after I observed it and looked back at the proof I then confirmed or justified it. The difference I am trying to explain is that even though we need substantially more evidence to justify a "right" mathematical formula after that justification is found it will be accepted by all or at least a large group of people. This differs when it comes to an ethical claim because both little or numerous justification will never lead to everyone accepting that ethical claim to be right or wrong. I do understand that when it comes to ethics there is more than one major division. Ethic absolutism and relativism are two of the major divisions that have been recognised globally and that are contradicting. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is not found in ethics because although we know the effect of correctly applying a mathematical formula will always get you the right answer, there is always uncertainty when it comes to applying "right" or "correct" ethics. We can never know for sure what the effect of an ethical decision will be. The reason behind that is because we we do not have sufficiently well-defined ethical axioms as we do in mathematics. To conclude, I understand that the question I was given was not a "yes or no question" rather it was a question where I have to outline and discuss the ways in which ethics can be justified as it is justified in mathematics. I can not reach such a confusion or fully elaborate all the deep meanings of justification when it comes to both these subjects. But what I can do is tell you is that the factors that must be assessed when it comes to ethics and the criteria used to assess them are much more problematic and complicated than the ones in mathematics. Basically, ethics are rational, but can never be as concrete as the answers to math. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, the arts, and ethics?

    And one must note that when ethics are used in this way, reason plays a large part because one must think objectively. For instance, I have a reasonable amount of education on a few of the major religions in world - Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

  2. Theory of knowledge essay outline

    Put interpretation of the apple may be different than any other * Objects can rarely be described without the use of sensory perceptions. * What we see is true: part of our culture * Learned to recognize and see what wrongs is what is not.

  1. TOK Mathematics and Sciences Essay

    do a problem if in a similar mood because they might think it is immoral to do so. In addition, if a mathematician does a problem wrongly, he or she is able to refer to a more certain proof that shows a valid way of solving the problem.

  2. TOk Discussion - Do we impose mathematics upon nature or is it naturally inherent ...

    Not only would that be visually awesome, it could provide an answer to using solar panels as a main source of energy. Mathematics and nature is all around us, so putting them together in design would make something incredible. A: Although we have discussed at length about mathematics, and how

  1. Is knowledge in mathematics and other Areas of Knowledge dependent on culture to the ...

    Language is a cultural trait and limits one's ability to chare a mathematical idea, but since numbers are the same universally, we can overcome that barrier and get our point across because math problems have only one solution and with the common language of numbers you can see the procedure.

  2. To what extent is truth different in mathematics, arts, and ethics?

    A more complex case study is the area of ethics, which is defined as a philosophical study of moral values and rules, along with the very standards that distinguish between right and wrong. It is no surprise that ethics is a particularly difficult subject to analyse, for after all, the

  1. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better it is. Discuss.

    If a falsifiable theory has passed the test without finding a case like that, then it could be accepted as a scientific truth.

  2. Justification, what distinguishes a good justification from a bad one?

    So when a person claims that he truly believes that there are eight planets orbiting the sun but he does not justify it, then he cannot claim he knows it. Or if he justifies it by stating that he dreamt about it, then he still does not know it for a fact because his justification is unacceptable and unreliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work