• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theory of Knowledge Topic 2 Essay

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Anyone can be angry-that is easy. But to be angry with the right person to the right degree, at the right time, for the right purpose and in the right way- that is not easy."[Aristotle] In justifying moral decisions, reason and emotion are symbiotic. Emotions, the feelings, moods and passions that a person has, have both a physical and a mental aspect. They are quick, appealing and unforgettable. They are independent from thinking and are reactions to a person's perception. Reason on the other hand, derives from logic. Without reason one cannot validate his/her ideas and this often results in urgent and short-sighted moral decision making. However, without emotion one has no operative long-term memory process, obliterating decision making and appreciation. One must also consider culture and belief however, for it is not only the ways of knowing concerning emotion and reason that justify moral decisions. In the area of knowledge, ethics, emotion without reason can result in hasty generalisations and blind one of the true realities of morality. Having lived in the Islamic nation of Indonesia, people are often prone to associating this country with terrorists and suicide bombers. If the moral decision at hand would be to define Islam, one would immediately respond upon his hidden contents. He/she would remember the feelings evoked upon hearing the word Islam; disgust, spite and hatred. For this is the image a person would retrieve, upon seeing pictures of debris and shrapnel in the news followed by the word Islam. ...read more.

Middle

Too strong of an emotion at a given state of mind nonetheless can also make one justify moral decisions based on rationalisations and emotional prejudice. If a person has an emotional prejudice against African Americans, she/he will only consider the culprits and overlook the Samaritans. This makes it very difficult to be objective as this assumption is based on an emotional fallacy. She/he would conclude in saying that they are 'criminals' and 'only harm people.' Reason in this case would allow one to remonstrate the assumption and consider the wider context. Emotion nevertheless is a vital source of energy and not purely a manufacturer of bad reasons. Emotions do not only distort reasoning however, they also make a person make short-sighted decisions in a situation of a turbulent emotion, such as anger. It is often the case that a person regrets this decision afterwards and justifies this irrational behaviour on temptation. After a person has finished his IB exams and hasn't reached his desired points, she/he would most likely be angry and this would be passed on to his moral decision making and furthermore result in emotive language. The conflict between emotion and reason and is often one of heart vs. head. Though a person might clearly see an emotion as an obstacle to justifying a moral decision, it is often the case that emotion distorts reasoning. In Germany, after finishing primary school, there area four types of school that students can go to depending on their intellect. ...read more.

Conclusion

She had to decide between both reason and emotion (scorn her son and family) or belief (family, regardless of culture). Emotion of course, whether conscious or subconscious told her to tell her son to find another woman, advocated by reason, as accepting this German women would logically disdain the Dutch family. She then told me that she no longer saw my mother, brother and me as Germans, but as her daughter in law and grandchildren, respectively. Irrespective of emotion and reason, belief has lead to a change in the corresponding emotion and reason. Both reason and emotion can easily result in bad reasoning to justify a moral decision. Too much of one is as irrational as too little of the other. Too much emotion can often distort ones beliefs and blind a person of the reality, as is often the case that with prejudices. Reason allows one to check the emotional conviction against the roots of reality, but too little emotion would mean that a person would have no medium of long term memory and manner of appreciation. To arrive at an objective sensible position, emotion is a key player both mentally and intellectually. In justifying moral decisions it is however, both an intuitive matter of the heart and rational reasoning of the head. One needs to weight down the two ways of knowing to arrive at a balanced outlook. Belief and culture on the other hand can also cloud ones judgement and justification of moral decisions, as this is central to an individual's mental mind. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. 12 Angry Men

    The last way of knowing is through our emotions. It is important because emotions help us make rational decisions about things by narrowing down our options so we can choose a number of manageable items. Also it is the main way to let us judge something.

  2. Matrix Essay; Red v.s Blue Pil?

    of solitude and depression as you wouldn't be around the people you had lived with, you wouldn't be eating the food you had enjoyed and you would have to deal with the emotional stress of accepting your life wasn't at all what you had imagined.

  1. Tok essay- context is all

    An example of this is whether there is an alligator under the bed- a child may be convinced that they can see it but when put in proper context it becomes a clear impossibility, since it would be very hard to get an alligator under a bed or to keep it alive.

  2. are reason and emotion equally necessary in the justifying a moral decision

    How can this statement be justified? By logical reasoning: * Honour killings are wrong. * Honour killings are considered as murder. * Murder is wrong. * Murder is the unnecessary taking of life. * The woman is alive. These are a few reasons as to why it is wrong.

  1. Extended Essay. How do social class and gender affect the pursuit of happiness ...

    It was a time were image was everything; people wanted to be known and the only way to do that was by being rich. It?s an interesting to see that perhaps attitudes like this still exist, to a lesser degree.

  2. Can we have beliefs or knowledge which are independent of our culture?

    In other cases, when accepting many beliefs from other cultures carries to gullibility, it may end up with a distorted and fantasy-ridden picture of the world (Van de Lagemaat, 2008). In conclusion, people decide what to decide or not, depending on their level of certainty.

  1. We want to investigate on whether the development of computer technology brings more positive ...

    classmates, your boss or your colleagues can easily track what you are doing. Certainly, we must make personal communications throughout the day, whether it is e-mail or Instant Messenger, just as a normal course of our daily lives, sending an email to a friend, or chatting to a classmate about

  2. Debate Topic - Individuals have a moral obligation to assist people in need.

    Contention one: Our moral responsibility requires us to be altruistic. Moral responsibility is a natural and direct component of moral agency; these actions have a capacity to have a moral quality.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work