• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What can be meant by the Panchantantra saying, Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes? Is it necessary to have clear ideas to see?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"What can be meant by the Panchantantra saying, "Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes?" Is it necessary to have clear ideas to see? The Panchantantra saying : "Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes," almost directly contradicts the popular idea held by many today in which "seeing is believing". However to truly understand the question asked, we must firstly define what is meant by knowledge, as the definition for this will surely affect the answer given to the question. Simply put knowledge can be defined as justified true belief. To elaborate, it isn't enough to simply believe something and accept it as fact, what you believe you know must be true, it should be an indisputable fact. For example I know my name is Samirah Musazi, as it is stated on my birth certificate, I am therefore justified in this belief, and can take this to be an aspect of my knowledge. This then leads to the question, what are the different ways of acquiring knowledge? And speaking specifically in terms of the question, are our eyes the most valuable tool in our acquisition of knowledge? To answer these questions I shall first examine the ways that our eyes (or sense perception) ...read more.

Middle

This can also be seen in people's exploitation of optical illusions whereby the brain sees something and simply makes up the rest. It builds a whole image as to what it believes should be true, even though it isn't. I have fallen victims to such tricks, a notable one is where you are presented with two rectangles which are of different shades of colour and are angled differently. One appears to be longer than the other, but they are actually both the same size. So in this instance we can say that I am in agreement with the Panchantantra saying, "Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes", as your eyes do have the power to deceive you. On the other hand, as I previously stated, for many the eyes are the true organ of sight. By sight I mean insight into the world and knowledge of our surroundings, this is demonstrated by the age old proverb: "seeing is believing." Although it can be acknowledged that at times our eyes do deceive us, for many they are the primary object used to discern what is around us. Through our eyes we gain what we perceive to be physical evidence, and for many this is enough. ...read more.

Conclusion

In other words, someone must have held the idea that the DNA had a purpose, which would have driven their desire to find out what the purpose was. So having clear ideas does indeed influence what we allow ourselves to see, or blind ourselves from. So what can be concluded from this? Through my analysis of the question we can see that there isn't a definite answer. In some instances our eyes alone are sufficient in causing us to have justified belief, but in other they can serve only to deceive us. Furthermore, having a certain belief can affect what we allow ourselves to see, or not to see in some cases. Perhaps it is better to use our eyes in conjunction with other senses in the hope that we will not be thoroughly deceived then. Or perhaps we can never fully rely on our senses. This is quite a cynical view, however I draw comfort in the fact that there 7billion human beings in this world, with 7 billion minds and beliefs. These beliefs often shape what we later discover, and there will always be someone willing to push the boundaries and see if something is true or not, leading to the general acquisition of knowledge. ?? ?? ?? ?? Samirah Musazi ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Evidence. One of the main differences between I am certain and it is certain ...

    Generally, authority is the main way of knowing that can successfully be used to justify both the statements. However, authority for 'I am certain' is based upon the perceived reliability of the person making the statement. Authority for 'it is certain' is based upon dependency on a text or a group of people, believed to be reliably informed.

  2. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence ...

    Though full of strong evidence, the prosecution was unable to prove O.J. Simpson was guilty of double murder, thus, this example lead me to think about he problems of strong evidence. The trail of Orenthal James Simpson was considered one of the cases where the prosecution had exceedingly articles

  1. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    And since there is no eternal value, we must will the eternal value of the same state of affairs'. Given this frame of thought, man is capable of abstract thought, perception and manipulation of thought and time. This has enormous implications on the pursuit and understanding of truth and knowledge in society.

  2. Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real ...

    form, with knowledge only to be found in the questioning of the intelligent and those in authority. Who in our age would think that the world and the universe is constant, let alone believe that asking those in authority would provide proof of anything?

  1. Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes". Discuss.

    Following the Gestalt theorem, when we walk into that room, we take in what we are seeing as a whole rather than identifying individual characteristics. It is not until we use our knowledge of that situation to process what we are really seeing.

  2. What can be meant by the panchatantra saying, knowledge is the true organ of ...

    The person?s eyes were not successful in judging the person but once it was connected to the knowledge they received by watching television. Therefore the eyes by itself may not always be completely truthful. Although what would a disabled person or a blind man do in this situation?

  1. In terms of knowledge, when we name things what is won and what is ...

    For example if you are chatting with a friend and he/she uses sarcasm, you will not perceive it as easily as you would if you had been carrying a conversation actually hearing or watching them. Or if you ask them how are they doing, the answer is almost routine and

  2. Two thirds of what we see is behind our eyes Chinese proverb

    The image is different in each mind, because different people image me in different ways. Everyone perceives the world in the different way; hence everyone's world is unique. So while I'm staying in front of the classroom there are at least twenty one projection of me in the different worlds

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work