• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What can be meant by the Panchantantra saying, Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes? Is it necessary to have clear ideas to see?

Extracts from this document...


"What can be meant by the Panchantantra saying, "Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes?" Is it necessary to have clear ideas to see? The Panchantantra saying : "Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes," almost directly contradicts the popular idea held by many today in which "seeing is believing". However to truly understand the question asked, we must firstly define what is meant by knowledge, as the definition for this will surely affect the answer given to the question. Simply put knowledge can be defined as justified true belief. To elaborate, it isn't enough to simply believe something and accept it as fact, what you believe you know must be true, it should be an indisputable fact. For example I know my name is Samirah Musazi, as it is stated on my birth certificate, I am therefore justified in this belief, and can take this to be an aspect of my knowledge. This then leads to the question, what are the different ways of acquiring knowledge? And speaking specifically in terms of the question, are our eyes the most valuable tool in our acquisition of knowledge? To answer these questions I shall first examine the ways that our eyes (or sense perception) ...read more.


This can also be seen in people's exploitation of optical illusions whereby the brain sees something and simply makes up the rest. It builds a whole image as to what it believes should be true, even though it isn't. I have fallen victims to such tricks, a notable one is where you are presented with two rectangles which are of different shades of colour and are angled differently. One appears to be longer than the other, but they are actually both the same size. So in this instance we can say that I am in agreement with the Panchantantra saying, "Knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes", as your eyes do have the power to deceive you. On the other hand, as I previously stated, for many the eyes are the true organ of sight. By sight I mean insight into the world and knowledge of our surroundings, this is demonstrated by the age old proverb: "seeing is believing." Although it can be acknowledged that at times our eyes do deceive us, for many they are the primary object used to discern what is around us. Through our eyes we gain what we perceive to be physical evidence, and for many this is enough. ...read more.


In other words, someone must have held the idea that the DNA had a purpose, which would have driven their desire to find out what the purpose was. So having clear ideas does indeed influence what we allow ourselves to see, or blind ourselves from. So what can be concluded from this? Through my analysis of the question we can see that there isn't a definite answer. In some instances our eyes alone are sufficient in causing us to have justified belief, but in other they can serve only to deceive us. Furthermore, having a certain belief can affect what we allow ourselves to see, or not to see in some cases. Perhaps it is better to use our eyes in conjunction with other senses in the hope that we will not be thoroughly deceived then. Or perhaps we can never fully rely on our senses. This is quite a cynical view, however I draw comfort in the fact that there 7billion human beings in this world, with 7 billion minds and beliefs. These beliefs often shape what we later discover, and there will always be someone willing to push the boundaries and see if something is true or not, leading to the general acquisition of knowledge. ?? ?? ?? ?? Samirah Musazi ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula ...

    Here repetition has worked in my favour allowing to me to induce the dates of the First World War, yet there are cases when repetition doesn't allow one to learn a truth. While I discovered the dates of the First World War, its effects on international relations from 1918 to 1939 are disputed.

  2. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence ...

    Therefore in mathematics, knowledge is not based on evidence, it is based on proof. This does not mean we cannot look at strength of evidence in mathematics. Evidence is used to show theories which might be true, and in this case, strength of evidence is purely based on amount -

  1. What might be meant by Nietzche's comment that "rational thought is interpretation according to ...

    I mean, some sort of religious leader, for example, might want to dismiss some scientific theory (not proof, but theory) because it seems to disproof some religious belief which is important in their religion. For example, Galileo discovered that the earth was the one that orbited around the sun and not the other way round, as it was thought.

  2. Evidence. One of the main differences between I am certain and it is certain ...

    Thus, you could say that 'I am certain' is dependent on the changing ideas of reality and is related to real life, whereas universal third person certainty doesn't change by this. ?? Ethics is reliant on and based upon the problems and differences between the two statements.

  1. One definition of knowledge is true belief based on strong evidence. What makes evidence ...

    As two things with strong connections tend to support each other, evidence with close relationship to the hypothesis, is also able to support the truth within that assumption. Authenticity, on the other hand, is the creditability of evidence. Only when the evidence is valid, will the knowledge that it is trying to justify be accurate.

  2. Two thirds of what we see is behind our eyes Chinese proverb

    The image is different in each mind, because different people image me in different ways. Everyone perceives the world in the different way; hence everyone's world is unique. So while I'm staying in front of the classroom there are at least twenty one projection of me in the different worlds

  1. What can be meant by the panchatantra saying, knowledge is the true organ of ...

    The person?s eyes were not successful in judging the person but once it was connected to the knowledge they received by watching television. Therefore the eyes by itself may not always be completely truthful. Although what would a disabled person or a blind man do in this situation?

  2. In terms of knowledge, when we name things what is won and what is ...

    On the other hand, we tend to lose the reality?s essence and we distortion it. By putting names to things we are categorizing and generalizing without even noticing. There is also certain abstraction or ambiguity linked to the different interpretations and lack of precision when we label things.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work