• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What do you understand by George Orwells comment that Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past? To what extent do you agree with it, and its implications?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

<Theory of Knowledge> Title: What do you understand by George Orwell's comment that "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past"? To what extent do you agree with it, and its implications? The devils dictionary defines history as "an account mostly false, or events mostly unimportant which are brough about by ruler mostly kanves, and soilders mostly fools". This definition suggests that rulers, the strongest party, creates the past and control the future. Therefore, this supports George Orwell's idea that the "winner" builds the past history and dicates the future events. Indeed, his account can be applied, and can be explictly found throughtout the human history. It was 18 century when James Watt first conceived steam engine. As a result of this invention, Britain and other nation in Europe were able to establish the "Industrialization." The steam engine had enourmus impact on heavy industry in terms of way it dramatically improved the quality and quantity of the outcome. Ultimately, there is no doubt that this accomplishment helped the Great Bratain to colonized countries all around the world. ...read more.

Middle

Moreover, the Europeans came to the new continent in a hope that they could actualize the ideal. However, this did not happen; in fact, they have taught their children that the war was a triump and Native Indian were the people whom hindered their ancesters from establshing the idea, which are in truth, absolutely absurd story. Moreover, this idea of "great triumph" was widely depicted in Amercian movie; you have probably seen in the American movie of cowboy winning over the "evil native Indians". Therefore, again, this anecdoe agree with the idea of George Orwell - Who controls the present controls the past. Indeed, as I have discussed above, George Orwell's comment has seemed agreeable. However, at the same time, his idea does not apply in some area. Firstly, the one who controlled the may not be able to control the future, but rather to be criticized and comtempted. The former leader of "the Soviet Union", Stalin, whom was called as "The Man of Iron", was castigated by the new leader Krushchev after his death; and Krushchev launched new policy of "Destalination" that rooted out all the legacy of Stalin. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, we have also seen the cases where Orwell's idea did not take place; in Russia, the influence of Stalin did not passed onto the next generation; and in Austrailia, the man made history regarding to aboriginals was revised. The reason for such change was mainly people regonized such history was "created and controlled" by the winners and people know that it is not upright to commit does thing especially when it generate grief over other humankind. In conclusion, I certainly agree with George Orwell's comment but it does not apply to all circumstance. And the positive aspect is these wrong, written histories are recently being recognized and being corrected. I believe that his comment is not a wholesome direction that a party that are in charge should be heading toward. And finally, throughtout writing this essay, I have learn that it is vital for our generation to identify those made histories and to bring up ourselves to build ability to see our history in the third person's point of view rather than having strong bias or prejudice. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. The extent and type of our language defines our knowledge of the world. Do ...

    Without words it would be difficult to remember our thoughts. Thinking about something unknown, our imagination, our creativity and the way we are able to discover make human beings different from other species and that is why it can be said that language is a consequence of the development of our knowledge instead of what defines our knowledge.

  2. Humanities Today Paper. Humanities can be considered the combination of culture, history, art, literature, ...

    This modern day art expedition is just one of the many examples of how we examine unique works of the past. As an individual who is inspired by talented musicians, song writers and composers, music has become something American culture thrives on.

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    believed to have established a colony in Newfoundland at around 1000 AD" (article handed out in class - May 20th marked the 500th anniversary of the death of Christopher Columbus). In comparison, since our approach to knowledge about the future is based on the past, the biases and limitations of

  2. Gun Control

    Gun Free; Why have guns? The crime rate has been on the rise for many years in the United States. With the population raising, the crime rates climbs with it. There have been many debates on gun control and the right to bear arms, which is stated in the constitution of the United States.

  1. Compare and contrast our approach to knowledge about the past with our approach to ...

    We are wary of accepting historical knowledge because we know that history was authorized by rulers and people in power. The historical accounts could have been compromised, and can present a distorted, prejudiced version of the past wars and truces.

  2. The historians task is to understand the past the human scientist, by contrast, is ...

    Many of the experiments run by human scientists were actually run with the intent of exploring the present human behavior, but ultimately were helpful for future purposes. An example of this would be the prominent Milgram experiment, which was run in 1963 after the trial of the German Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichman.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work