Fathers and Sons Analysis on ending was Turgenev trying to depict the novel as optimistic or pessimistic?

Authors Avatar

Fathers and Sons – Analysis on ending – was Turgenev trying to depict the novel as optimistic or pessimistic?  

I would like to show how the novel, Fathers and Sons is more optimistic than pessimistic, through the way in which nature is often seen to depict hope, or signs of love and romanticism in a good light.

The first important part that nature play in the novel is in Nikolai's perspective, after he realises how his son has changed (on page 131) thus leading him back to his old memories.  He uses nature as an escape, and it's not pessimistic in any way because Nikolai clearly still knows how to love and appreciate nature, music is one of his great hobbies Mind us that the memories he links nature with are about happiness, beauty, all those sweet memories that he likes to reminisce about. “He would look up into the red sun…sweet memories.”

Although we know he doesn't really want to think about the real life hardships, such as his landowning business, we can still see that even Nikolai, the older generation in this novel can show signs of hope, and we later see in the novel that happiness does again come to him. Nikolai is like a symbol for the older generation here.

Join now!

Bazarov, the contrast to Nikolai, is not that at all as 'pessimistic' as you think. His downfall was because of his pride, and less about his philosophy. In fact, he doesn't seem to be that much of a nihilist. IF we look at page 166 , we can see that he and Anna had 'set off on a botany expedition' and came back just before dinner, which clearly is a long time. Nature has brought the two characters together, and we can even see that Bazarov's face was even  “cheerful and even tender”.

And is it not ...

This is a preview of the whole essay