• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How do Medea and Hedda Gabler combine tradition and unconventionality within their roles as women in a constraining society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How do Medea and Hedda Gabler combine tradition and unconventionality within their roles as women in a constraining society? The eponymous characters featured in both Medea and Hedda Gabler have perpetually been cast as unconventional women, defying every aspect of feminine behaviour expected of them in their respective societies. However, in truth, both women conform to convention far more than it would seem, albeit in contrasting ways. Medea dreams of the same future as any ordinary Greek woman would even despite her refugee status. In the end it is circumstances that drive her to the unexpected and terrible acts she commits. Hedda differs within her relationship with the culture surrounding her and fights at it. She is forced to live the life of a traditional woman in her society and hates it, as we shall see, she makes any effort she can to escape it. This combination of propriety and unconventionality contribute to the power of both plays as tragedies. There is some debate, though, on whether the playwrights intentionally did this, or, due to the cultural era they inhabited, they could not possibly see women totally unshackled from their roles in society. Medea appears to be a traditional wife in many ways therefore the cataclysmic breakdown of her marriage with Jason is more of a surprise to the reader; the way in which it dissolves into such violence. Throughout the play, there is evidence that Medea approached her family life in a very traditional manner: treasuring her children and respecting her husband's authority over her. ...read more.

Middle

There is one moment where she indulges in tempestuous conversation with Ejlert Lovborg however she still carefully maintains the appearance of respectability by wearing the fa�ade of two friends perusing a photo album. In contrast, Medea is totally unafraid of scandal. Whilst Hedda's only conventional trait is her fear of social disapproval, Medea was completely ready and willing to take on the role as a traditional wife in order to please Jason. Given this attitude, then, one would imagine that Medea a very meek and submissive figure. However, this is not so as when love turns to hate after Jason's betrayal, as she volunteered herself into this role she has total power to break away from it. It becomes clear when she says, "Love, did you say? It is a mighty curse." This is the first time we begin to see the cracks in Medea's marital bliss with Jason. When she begins to contemplate killing Creon and his daughter, an act no respectable Greek woman would even consider, we see her complete lack of fear of scandal. She says, "(Creon) lets me stay one extra day, to make three enemies corpses: ha! father, daughter, and my husband" Her greatest worry is for her own physical safety, which is assured by her extraction of a promise of sanctuary from King Aegeus. There is only one fear that Medea has which even resembles a fear of scandal and that takes the form of the totally masculine fear of humiliation before one's enemies: the only thing men were truly afraid of in Greek society. ...read more.

Conclusion

He said himself that he had to know his characters through and through before he could begin writing as was stated in an interview for The Humanitarian in January 1987. He said, "Before I write down one word, I have to have the character in my mind through and through. I must penetrate into the last wrinkle of his soul." It would therefore appear that Ibsen's plays have always been driven by the characters as opposed to the plot, and all the events within the plot are a direct result of the natural progression of the storyline due to the personalities of the characters. The story of Hedda Gabler is totally driven by Hedda's internal conflict between her great longing - breaking the restrictive shackles of society - and fear of social condemnation. Therefore, it would appear that Ibsen deliberately crafted her character to be a cess pit of battling emotions in a maelstrom of resentment. Medea and Hedda Gabler both manage to combine traditional and untraditional aspects of their roles as women, albeit in distinct ways. For Hedda, the end is bleak and tragic as she is trapped and defeated by the social constraints she wants so desperately to defy, whilst in the meantime Medea uses her social role to her advantage, exploiting the degrading position in puts her in to achieve her final victory. Euripides made the mythical murderess Medea somewhat traditional because it would make her character worthy of the audience's pity, while Ibsen made Hedda a character torn in an internal battle between tradition and rebellion because he was intrigued at the aftermath this dual nature would create. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

This world literature essay on Medea and Hedda Gabler is well-written and focused into comparing the novels with respect to the ability of the eponymous female characters to mix tradition and unconventionality within their roles as domineering women in a ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This world literature essay on Medea and Hedda Gabler is well-written and focused into comparing the novels with respect to the ability of the eponymous female characters to mix tradition and unconventionality within their roles as domineering women in a constraining, male-dominated, chauvinistic society. The introductory paragraph is aptly placed to introduce the essay topic, introduce the works discussed, shortly comment on the skeletal framework of the essay and mention lightly the cultural context of the works. In subsequent paragraphs, the writer discusses the characterization of Hedda and Medea with respect to the novels. While this is done separately, the writer manages to create links within each point to establish a comparative perspective, which is something markers look out for. The writer uses numerous quotations to justify the interpretations, which enhances the quality of the report. Throughout the report, the writer inserts information about the context of the texts, especially the role and treatment of women in the past and then links to the text to show the constrained positions of Hedda and Medea. Hence, the writer has definitely answered the question to a certain extent.

Level of analysis

The writer’s depth of analysis is competent yet moderate for many reasons. Firstly, the use of quotations to interpret the text and justify this interpretation is apt. Secondly, the use of cultural details on the societal context and background of the novels to provide insight into the texts is notably done. Thirdly, the interpretation of audience reaction to what is happening in the texts is essential and the writer manages to include this throughout the text. Fourthly, the use of details on literary aspects of the dramas is evident, especially in the use of details on diction, language, characterization and thematic ideas. Of course, the interpretation of characterization is significantly important to this essay specifically, and to suit this, the writer manages to interpret not just the characterization, but is able to compare the techniques and depth of the characterization. On a higher level, the writer also links this to the thematic ideas if the text. However, there are also some lapses in the level of analysis. For example, the writer scarcely mentions the use of literary devices utilised and these include techniques such as similes, metaphors, symbols and imagery. Since the plays are rather symbolic plays, the details on symbols and motifs are especially lacking. Moreover, the texts are dramas, so there must be some inclusion of dramatic techniques such as flashbacks, asides and notably the use of deus ex machina in the case of Medea. More importantly, the writer needs to realize that while similarities need to be mentioned, the more subtle differences between these similarities should e mentioned to score in the range of 17-20 for the world literature commentary.

Quality of writing

The use of grammar and vocabulary is satisfactory, but as mentioned above, the writer needs large improvements in the use of technical terms, especially those relating to literary devices and dramatic techniques. Overall, a good world literature commentary with rooms for improvement.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by Arcturus 21/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. Catcher in the Rye written task + Rationale. To be able to sound ...

    For instance, I made Phoebe sign in a lot of entries like "Phoebe Weatherfield Caulfield" as we are told in the book that she constantly changes her middle name. I also used a lot of the elements referred in the book like the movie of "The 39 steps" and situated

  2. Marked Essay.Compare and Contrast the effect of the narrative point of view in 'The ...

    Throughout the novel there is a theme of a quest for knowledge and understanding, on the part of Bruno. To the reader the subject matter of the novel is very clear but the way the reader is kept engaged is to see how Bruno comes to an understanding of the events happening around him.

  1. In Medea, Euripides uses Medea to portray his views on the unfair treatment of ...

    Medea even murders her children in order to emasculate Jason and to save her children from being killed by others. Euripides shows the audience through Medea's acts that she is not the typical weak female character in most tragedies but rather a strong and spiteful female lead.

  2. Analysis of "The verger" by William Somerset Maugham. (Text of story in Vietnamese).

    First it?s tragic and at the end funny. - Albert is a very calm person, not stupid, even if he can?t write and read - The vicar work in a fashionable church. He wants to make it more fashionable, but he didn?t see the spiritual sight of it.

  1. The supremacy of fright in The Tiger by S. Rajaratnam.

    After listening to a twisted story from Fatima?s mother, the village, ?was in panic? the women, clucking like hens at the sight of a wheeling hawk? [and] the men rushed around anxious.?(2) Clearly, the villagers show no form of patience nor sense to hold a group meeting to negotiate what needs to be done about this tiger.

  2. Who is to blame for the death of Dido in Virgil's Aeneid?

    life, hence indicating that she herself may be responsible for her own death. This is proven in another instance, when her love is prefixed with the term "fatal", converting the phrase to "fatal love". The dramatic irony here, apart from clueing the reader as to what is to come of

  1. So Long a Letter, by Mariama Ba, and Song of Lawino, by Okot pBitek, ...

    Lawino describes Clementine as ?[t]he beautiful one [who] aspires to look like a white woman; [h]er lips are red like glowing charcoal [s]he resembles the wild cat that has dipped its mouth in blood?. (p37) Towards the end of the poem, Lawino takes a different stance and is no longer angry at Clementine.

  2. Analysis of two Australian poems- Australia by Alec Derwent Hope and Enter without So ...

    Australia for him is destitute of culture. Which is ?without songs, architecture, and history? here he also says ?rivers of water drown amidst inland sands?. Though he still believes that it has the competences to do so, yet the ideas drowned as inland sands the river of her immense stupidity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work