• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"When The Emperor Was Divine". Confession: Who is speaking? Is the speech ironic? Why has Otsuka chosen to end the novel this way? What does this imply about our ability to separate out the enemy, the other, in our midst?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

When The Emperor Was Divine Q: Confession: Who is speaking? Is the speech ironic? Why has Otsuka chosen to end the novel this way? What does this imply about our ability to separate out the ?enemy?, the ?other?, in our midst? In the chapter titled ?Confession? the speaker admits to the reader the truths of the story. This person talks about how the manner in which the police gathered and questioned them was true. This person confesses all the real life truths the Japanese went through whether it was in the camps or back at their home life. They confess their thoughts and feelings on the matter. The father is the speaker in the duration of the confession. He is the spokesperson for all the Japanese during this time and saying their inner most sacred thoughts and feelings since most didn?t have the voice to do so themselves. It is in the confession after some time spent with the police that he just breaks down and tells the police what they want to hear. ...read more.

Middle

He holds so much sadness and anger, but knows nothing will change and that is the truly sad part about it all. In the confession it continues even further on with the father saying, ?So go ahead lock me up. Take my children. Take my wife? (142). The father is proving a point in this moment. Usually when a parent?s child is in danger they will fight for their child to stay and make an exchange but not in this case. The father has already been stripped bare of his culture, heritage, and home by the American government. That has taken away his supposed freedom and rights. Has desecrated his home and made him public enemy number one, so why not finish the job off by taking his family away from him too. He feels lost and like he has nothing left to give or live for. All the things that made him, he has been taken away quite forcefully, and then he?s being told to act more American. ...read more.

Conclusion

She wanted to show how there really are no lines between ?other? and ?enemy.? The lines become blurred somewhere along the way. People do not know when or how but they just get associated with the enemy. For instance when 9/11 happened, people were quick to judge and assume every Muslim had something to do with that terrorist attack. When really the ones being attacked were the Muslims not associated with the terrorist group. They had nothing to with the group but were bunched with them because of the same religion they shared. Like when the father says, ?Who am I? You know who I am. Or you think you do? (142). You don?t know a person until you get to know them and their beliefs. You can?t just bunch them together to make things easier because then you are only closing yourself off to the world where there is no possibility of hope for generations to come. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. Is divine law or human law better?

    It is a rather ironic declaration because no sense of the expected familial piety from the uncle is shown. He expresses his strong disgust, singling her out using a hyperbole "the traitor, the only one in the whole city," to place emphasis on the gravity of the situation - how

  2. How are the plot, point of view, tone, setting, and theme of the First ...

    The little boy showed a marked reluctance to proceed; he affected to be very interested in the shops-windows. (first paragraph, page 1). The setting, which changes, is a very influential factor in the development of this story's internal conflict. As Jackie heads to the church, his view of his surroundings is colored by his thoughts and emotions.

  1. For this task, my main objective was to look at the world through the ...

    But I couldn't really tell her that, she'd think I was jealous or something, which I wasn't. I meen he is probably with someone else now and does not even remember what Jane name is. That poor bastard. 'Yeah I know, Stradlater told me he was going out with you.'

  2. Atticu's closing speech

    Atticus' defences were well-thought: Mayella Ewell was savagely beaten up by someone left-handed, but the only hand Tom could have used was his right one. Hadn't him been seen by Mr Ewell, Tom wouldn't have even touched her. What is unbearable by all the society in Maycomb is Tom's evidence:

  1. Othello made his last speech in that way because he wanted the audience to ...

    He commanded Lodovico to record his story faithfully. "I pray you in your letters" the word pray could mean that he is begging Lodovico to do what Othello says. "Then you must speak Of one that loved not wisely, but too well; Of one, not easily jealous, but being wrought Perplexed in the extreme..."

  2. Tesman and Lovborgs ability to fulfill Hedda's needs

    Lovborg was one of the furthest men from ideal but yet Hedda chose to have a relationship with him. Through the play it is evident that Lovborg and Hedda had many meaningful conversations as well as sexual experiences. Ibsen mentions Lovborg and Hedda having sexual connection to highlight the excitement

  1. Social Distinction in the novel Pygmalion

    Since Shaw philosophically wanted to do completely away with the lower class, he is pleased to force Doolittle into accepting a position where he will not be comfortable being one of the "undeserving poor"; Shaw undoubtedly was secretly delighted at the discomfiture that Doolittle was undergoing.

  2. In William Goldings Lord of the Flies, and in John Knowles A Separate Peace, ...

    Gene is a scholar who is very serious about his schoolwork, and does not enjoy sports quite as much as Finny does. To sum up Gene?s personality, he is almost the opposite of Finny. Gene gets jealous easily and in Knowles? novel allows himself to be taken by mankind?s inner evil.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work