• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Freedom - I have always been free ever since I was born.

Extracts from this document...


FREEDOM I have always been free ever since I was born. My parents never hindered my dreams and my ambition even though they wanted me to be something more than what I wanted to be, they never failed to support my dreams. Freedom differs because there are three levels of it: freedom from, to and for. In my younger years, I did not have much experience on what it is to be free from. Whenever there are parties of my friends, or school trips, I am not usually allowed, and if I am permitted, there is always a condition that I have to bring a nanny. Even just to play outside our very house is a no-no for me. Nevertheless, I am thankful that my parents deprived me of not doing those things and I understand and appreciate their most noble reason of keeping me safe. There was a time when I thought the world would crumble down if I am not allowed to go, but I was wrong.... ...read more.


I experienced freedom to when my parents gave me the right to at least choose some things I am capable of handling at my age. There was an experience wherein I felt freedom to.... I was never hindered from choosing my own course. I often ask my mother what course I should take, she just tells me whatever course I am happy with. With those simple words, she is giving me the freedom to be someone I want to be. Freedom to is a more liberating experience compared to freedom from because it gives the person more meaning in his life and a sense of responsibility. This type of freedom not only makes us choose, it also determines our life or end. It is however, not enough. There is a higher type of freedom. Freedom for is the type of freedom that needs commitment. I am experiencing freedom for since I am committed in serving God as well as my family and friends. ...read more.


Being free makes a person feel better and relieved. It gives him a sense of worth and responsibility. Freedom from is a very steep level and does not fulfill a person. It is just a short-term freedom, like in my experience, after joining the trip, who knows when I will be permitted again.... Freedom to is related to freedom for. When I am free to be the person I want to be, I commit myself in fulfilling that commitment, therefore, it gives my life meaning. Every individual longs to be free. However, most of the people settle to be free from chains and parents. They do not use their freedom properly, instead of developing their freedom into a more meaningful sense, they prefer to use it for pleasure, not knowing that they will become prisoners of their actions. My experiences made me realize the freedom is not just being allowed to do whatever I desire but it also involves responsibilities and making commitments. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. The Problem of Free WIll

    I knew that my house was not on the way, but since they were willing to drop me off, I guess it wasn't too much of a bother for them. We were on the freeway, about to make a turn, when another car swerved passed us and crashed right next

  2. How has the concept of free will and individual freedom been adapted

    A slave was seen as a tool and "despite being human, he is a piece of property; and a piece of property is

  1. Language as Freedom in Sartre's Philosophy

    It is emptiness of the In-itself. Sartre states that the For-itself never "exists For-itself but only for the object, and that subjectivity is a consciousness without Subject." (8) In other words, for the For-itself to remain free it must also be immaterial; it can never be an object, not even that of its own.

  2. The Free Will Debate

    If one were to believe that contradictions exist and are not simply errors in our thinking, all rational thought would be broken down.

  1. Is Freedom Always a Good Thing?

    Where is my free will to begin with? Paradigmatic acts of free will are the lîbêra arbitria voluntâtis, the "free judgments/decisions of will". We get the word "arbitrary" from arbitrium because of the sense that a free will can make a decision between indistinguishable alternatives, for which no preference, or no reason for preference, can be discerned.

  2. Hobbes & the concept of the free will

    This result, that man is really an automaton, was of course implicit already in the account of 'sense' as being itself a form of motion in matter. It was that classification of 'mind' with 'matter' which rendered it, along with every other part of the universe, subject to all the

  1. Is free will compatible with causal determination?

    There is no choice open to them, and it is as if the right hand path simply does not exist. In this instance, when they go left they could not have acted otherwise and thus, free will is not present.

  2. When, if ever, is coercion exercised by governments and political institutions legitimate?

    Hobbes believed that the only way to subdue such individual powers would be to create a greater one. A sovereign, who creates conditions, to securely follow laws of nature, thus legitimising the act of coercion. However, it is difficult to say who would be chosen to rule if everyone wants

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work