• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


Plato's Philosophy Name: Jousianne Propp Subject: Theology and Ethics 1.a) The Allegory of the Cave The Allegory of the Cave can be found in Book VII of Plato's best-known work, The Republic, a lengthy discussion on the nature of justice. It is written as a dialogue between Socrates and his apprentice Glaucon. Plato creates the image of prisoners who have been chained inside a cave since birth. Their limbs and heads are immobilized so that their eyes are fixed to a wall opposite them. Behind the prisoners is a fire and in front of that there is a raised path, along which shapes of various artificial objects are being carried. These cast shadows on the wall. The prisoners assign names to the images they see and which they believe to be real, for this is the only reality they know. One of the prisoners escapes and sees the fire and the people carrying the objects. He continues towards the mouth of the cave and steps outside. The sunlight blinds him and at first he can only make out dark blurry shapes which soon become bright and clear and he observes that everything he has seen in the cave are just images of the reality he sees now. ...read more.


In contrast, the contemporary approach known as British Empiricism held that all ideas come to us through experience, and thus that knowledge (with the possible exception of mathematics) is essentially empirical. At issue is the fundamental source of human knowledge, and the proper techniques for verifying what we think we know. Rationalists typically argued that, starting with intuitively-understood basic principles, like the axioms of geometry, one could deductively derive the rest of knowledge. The philosophers who held this view most clearly were Baruch Spinoza and Gottfried Leibniz, whose attempts to grapple with the epistemological and metaphysical problems raised by Descartes led to a development of the fundamental approach of Rationalism. Both Spinoza and Leibniz thought that, in principle, all knowledge - including scientific knowledge - could be gained through the use of reason alone, though they both accepted that in practice this wasn't possible for human beings except in specific areas such as maths. Descartes, on the other hand, was closer to Plato, thinking that only knowledge of eternal truths - including the truths of mathematics, and the epistemological and metaphysical foundations of the sciences - could be attained by reason alone; other knowledge required experience of the world, aided by the scientific method. ...read more.


While one horse is of noble breed and well-behaved, the other, is unruly and rebellious. He uses this metaphor to describe the soul's partition in three main parts: The divine part - reason The noble part - courage The reluctant part - desire Plato assigns different virtues to these three components; the soul's first task is to become wise through reason; therefore reason's virtue is wisdom. The soul's second task is to obey reason and it's virtue is bravery and the third task is to control desire, so it's virtue is moderation. Plato places a forth virtue above these three: justice (diakaiosýne). Justice can only be done when the three virtues fulfill their individual tasks as one. In the analogy the charioteer represents reason, which should be in control. The fine horse denotes the noble emotions of the spirited part of the soul (courage) and the disorderly horse represents the passions of the desiring part of the soul. The implications of the analogy are clear: if the charioteer has no horses at all the chariot is never going to move; if you have a two-horse carriage and only one horse is yoked to it, the chariot will go askew immediately, so in order for your wagon to move straight you must have both horses properly harnessed. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. In this paper, I am going to compare and contrast Hume's empiricism to Descartes' ...

    According to Hume, the mind does not have its own power to know things without first haven't experienced it.

  2. Compare and Contrast Descarte’s Rationalism and Hume’s Empiricism

    Because he believes that it is equally out of the question either to verify or disprove that anything exists outside the mind, stating that we can never be directly aware of anything outside our own thoughts, he has to be content with suspending his certainty with regards to this.

  1. Compare Hume's Empiricism & Descartes Rationalism

    So we have no rational basis for believing that the sun will rise tomorrow. Yet we do believe it! Descartes said that, most of human behaviour, like that of animals can be explained amd cleverly designed machines could successfully copy nearly all of what we do.

  2. Insider epistemology

    and perhaps not even by her family because they did not have the exact same experiences as she did. This position that "each person has privileged access to his or her own mental states and processes" (Fay, 1996, p.10) is called 'individual methodological solipsism' (Merton, 1972, p.15)

  1. 'The body/soul distinction is a myth derived from philosophers such as Plato.' Discuss.

    determined by the way we live our lives; the consequences of our actions in this life can influence whether we are reborn as a human or as, e.g. a slug. Another fault lies in the very nature of the 'transmigrating soul' itself.

  2. Kant's Philosophy

    experience; we cannot determine this to be true through an analysis of the concepts of "president" or "APJ Abdul Kalam." A priori reasoning, in contrast, does not depend upon experience to inform it. The concept "bachelor" logically entails the ideas of an unmarried, adult, human male without my needing to conduct a survey of bachelors and men who are unmarried.

  1. Explain and discuss the significance of Descartes' work on Epistemology.

    It would be the real thing - guaranteed, indubitable knowledge. Like the philosopher Bernard Williams says in the book of 'The Great Philosophers' - "it's like having a barrel of apples, and some of them are bad and some of them are sound, and you wasn't to separate out the sound ones."

  2. Compare and contrast Foucault's understanding of the Enlightenment with that of Horkheimer and ...

    divorce of humanity from the natural context from which it cannot, Adorno contends, be extricated: "Enlightenment, which depended for its progress on the dialectic of subject and object, ends in the destruction of the resistance (the latency) of nature. Its self-destructive terminus is the cessation of the dialectic in the indifference of subject and object.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work