• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Religion & the 2000 Election

Extracts from this document...


Religion & the 2000 Election The Separation of Church and State and the Separation of Religion and Day to Day life. The 2000 Election campaign has seen Joseph Liebermanask the American people to allow the spirit to "move [him], as it does," we have been told by Bush that the philosopher that influenced him the most is Christ, Al Gore commented that he would base his decisions on what Jesus would do, and Bill Clinton has publicly talked about his struggle to rebuild his life after the scandal he incurred with a certain white house intern. When did American politicians suddenly start sounding like a church devotional group, and why has this election campaign become a race where the candidates were constantly trying to out do each other in the area of which of them was the most Christian?[1] Has this represented a swing in the ideals of the average American? It seems odd in the face of all the cultural liberalism that we are seeing that suddenly politics has become the forum where, unless you have God in your campaign speeches you will be unable to make it to office. In order to try to explain this seemingly sudden preoccupation, this paper will both look at the history of American politics, and put forth a few theories as to why the change has occurred, and reasons for the actions of parties involved in American Politics. What we first need to take a look at is if this sudden swing towards more god speak in politics is really anything new, or if it is simply more noticeable, or something in between. The history of the legal separation of church and state in America can be traced back to the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. ...read more.


" They teach abstinence from sexual activity outside marriage as the expected standard for all school age children, and that abstinence from sexual activity is the only certain way to avoid out-of-wedlock pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and other associated health problems." The most significant aspect about this passage is not so much what it is saying up front, but the message within that message. It becomes clear that the position of the Bush campaign is that the married two-parent family that includes a mother and a father is the only family that is considered a positive family. A morality that can be directly traced back to the religious teachings of the right oriented churches. Ergo, under the Bush philosophy, it can be inferred that a single woman who chooses to have a baby out of wedlock falls into the negative statistic column. This, and many other examples just go to show you that the idea that religion and politics have been separate is, in fact, not the case. Another theory as to why religion has become a much less taboo subject is because in fact fewer Americans are as religious. As the public has become less religious it doesn't mean as much that they have come to believe in a God any less, it simply means that they are not as divided along religious lines to the extent that the American public has been divided along religious lines in the past. Another interesting fact to this slide is, "at their convention in Philadelphia, the Republicans spoke less in the vocabulary of faith than they did from 1984 to 1996."[8] This is significant in the fact that the religious leanings of the party have, in fact, been lessened when it comes to some of their policy issues. ...read more.


This is why it is possible for Bush to say that the philosopher who influenced him most is Christ, while also supporting the death penalty, something that Jesus made clear as not being an option, when he stepped in and prevented the stoning of the prostitute outside the temple. Or, perhaps Bush would have a hard time explaining how the republican position against gun control fits into the philosophy of Jesus. While the pro-choice and pro-abortion stance of the democrats decidedly does fit into the teachings of the sanctity of life, as they are outlined in the New Testament. Personal religious belief and religious practice aside, when one really takes a critical look at both of the parties, the morality that is required by both God and the Church simply is not there and this fact would be clear to any actually practicing Christian. Thus what should in fact be suggested as one of the major reasons for why it is ok to invoke God's name in all its forms, is the fact that it is, in reality only lip service, to the same extent of the lip service of musicians thanking God in their acceptance speeches. When it comes to the electing of officials, it is the policy and actions of the two parties that people will judge when it comes to their electoral vote. The invoking of the name of God by the politicians is no different then the practices of 'Sunday Christians.' They will statistically fall into the category of religious, but practically fall into the category of secular non-believers, who make their decisions based on what serves their needs best, as opposed to what serves their God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Philosophy and Theology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Philosophy and Theology essays

  1. Kant's Philosophy

    Teleological Judgment65 The creative activity of nature develops itself in a successive series of phenomena connected with one another mechanically, that is, through the laws of causality. Reflecting upon this mechanical succession, one soon notes that the individual elements of the series are harmoniously coordinated toward a common end,

  2. Theology of Marriage and Family.

    Although, I was very upset about the divorce, I was able to adjust to the new lifestyle, and at times, I can remember actually enjoying having two homes. The real blow that came to destroy my idea of what family was, occurred when I found out that my father had

  1. The Two-Part Morality of Machiavellian Politics

    The unnecessary cruelty to those close to him turned friends into enemies, and support into hate. This hate was his death, both literally and figuratively. Aligned with Berlin, Cassirer also describes Machiavellian politics as a game; Cassirer makes the claim that Machiavelli views politics as a game of chess, a game played to win.

  2. Outline the view that there are no rights and wrongs in sexual ethics:To what ...

    Any human behaviour taken to access without boundaries has the potential to become very destructive in an individuals life. Alongside the sexual revolution, a more alarming revolution has also taken place. Marriage and family life is starting to break down; the impact on emotional mental health is starting to become

  1. In The War of The Worlds, what is H. G. Well's view of organised ...

    "Why are these things permitted? What sins have we done? The morning service was over, I was walking through the roads, and then -fire, earthquake, death! As if it were Sodom and Gomorrah!" The curate makes a reference to the bible, concerning "Sodom" and "Gomorrah".

  2. It has sometimes been remarked how much has been written, both by friends and ...

    The whole of the prevalent metaphysics of the present century is one tissue of suborned evidence in favour of religion; often of Deism only, but in any case involving a misapplication of noble impulses and speculative capacities, among the most deplorable of those wretched wastes of human faculties which make

  1. Outline the reasons why it may be claimed that religion and morality are linked. ...

    are actually only what appear to those cultures to be moral. The various norms themselves only show us what different cultures and eras believe is proper moral behaviour. What some cultures believe may not actually be truly moral, but may only appear to that culture to be moral.

  2. United States History. Religion has always had a central role in the history of ...

    This strict adherence to traditional and conservative views and strict theological governance resulted in dissidence towards the leadership of the colony. The neighboring colony of Rhode Island was established justly as a consequence of an uprising towards the puritan institute of Massachusetts and Plymouth as safe havens for those who

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work