• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Article 38 of the statute of the International Court of Justice(ICJ).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INSTITUTIONS M07914 COURSEWORK NAME: JACQUELINE YEE-BING, LEE STUDENT NUMBER: 01228801 NUMBER OF WORDS: 895 In relation to Article 38 of the statute of the International Court of Justice(ICJ), Schwarzenberger. defined; 'In order to enable the World court to apply any asserted rule of international law, it must be shown that it is the product of one, or more, of three law creating processes.'1 These processes are; treaties, international customary law, and the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations. References to judicial decisions or to the teachings of highly qualified publicist are secondary sources of international law. However, in accepting that there is a material and formal distinction between the sources of law, it is reasonable to assume that there is some form of hierarchy within the Article 38 as the sources cannot be equally important. Treaties are of growing importance and the 'maids-of-all-work'2 in international law. Often, they resemble contracts in national system of law, but they also perform functions, which in national systems, would be carried out by Acts of Parliament. The only distinction between a 'law-making treaty' and a 'contract-treaty' is one of content. However, there had been argument as to whether treaties are a formal source of law as opposed to simply being a source of obligation. Fitzmaurice explained through reference to the principle pacta sunt servanda3 (Gabcikovo-Nagymaros4 Case), there is an antecedent general principle of law5 that the obligation must be carried out, but that the obligation is not, in itself, law. ...read more.

Middle

In effect, this is what creates a hierarchy of the sources of law. When a treaty comes into force, it will overrides customary law as between the parties to the treaty (Wimbledon Case)12. States make treaties because they regard the relevant rules of customary law is inadequate. However, treaties can come to an end through desuetude13, which often takes the form of the appearance of a new rule of customary law, conflicting with the treaty. The only difference between treaties and custom is one of type, treaties representing an express agreement and custom characterising an implied agreement. . General principles is the third source of law, where principles that are common to all or most national systems of law is used to fill the holes in international law. Today, it has come to regulate certain contracts made by individuals or companies with states or international organizations such as, contracts of employment in international organizations. Treaties and customary law contain limited rules applicable to such topics and the gap has been filled by recourse to general principles of commercial and administrative law, borrowed from national legal systems. However, it is important to note that treaties and custom prevail over general principles of law in the event of conflict. Nevertheless, there may be other hierarchies based on other grounds as in Hulsroj article14, who thinks general principles of law is a better source of law than customs. ...read more.

Conclusion

* Sir Robert Jennings and Sir Arthur Watts, eds., Oppenheim's International Law, 9th ed. (London: Longman, 1996). 1 Schwarzenberger, The Inductive Approach To International Law (1965) 2 Akehurst's Modern Introduction To International Law-1997 Routledge p.37 3 Art. 26 Vienna Convention On The Law Of Treaties. 4 Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Case (1997) ICJ Reports, (1998) 37 ILM 162 5 Fitzmaurice, "Expression of Consent to be Bound by a Treaty as Developed in Certain Environmental Treaties" in Klabbers and Lefeber, eds., Essays on the Law of Treaties (1998), pp. 59-80. 6 Rosalyn Higgins -Problems and Process, Ch 2 7 Right Of Passage over Indian Territory, International Court of Justice (ICJ) Rep. 1960, p6 8 North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, ICJ, Rep. 1963, p.3 9 Asylum Case, I.C.J. Rep. 1950, p.266 10 Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case, I.C.J. Rep. 1951 p.116 11 Lotus Case, P.C.I.J. Rep., ser. A, No.10 (1927) 12 Wimbledon Case, P.C.I.J. Rep.,Ser. A, No.1 (1923) 13 Desuetude - a term used to describe the situation in which the treaty is consistently ignored by one or more parties, with the acquiescence of the other party or parties. 14 Hulsroj, Peter - Three Sources - No River .A Hard Look at the Sources of Public International Law With Particular Emphasis on Custom and ' General Principles of Law' Austr. JIL 54 (1999), 219 15 Nicaragua Case (Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua) (Nicaragua v. The United States) Case (Merits), ICJ. Rep. 1986 16 Rosalyn Higgins, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon, 1994) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Case Note on Belgium v Spain [1970] ICJ Rep. 4: Barcelona Traction Case: Its ...

    company representing foreign capital, the general rule of international law authorized the national State of the company alone to exercise diplomatic protection for the purpose of seeking redress. No rule of international law expressly conferred such a right on the shareholder's national State.

  2. To what degree of harm should Article 8 protect the right of the individual ...

    In the first instance a determination of the level of harm that should be tolerated by the law in situations where the victim consents is a matter for the State concerned. However, the court has reasoned that the State must still have regard for a balance, on the one hand,

  1. What is the status of the precautionary principle in International Law?

    traditional burden of proof.10 Apparently, two prominent characteristics of the precautionary principle are: proposition of action to address a serious threat to the environment while there is still some scientific uncertainty, and the shift of the burden of proof upon those who seek to continue the potentially harmful practice, or

  2. Public International Law.

    I will start with the UN resolution, a UN resolution cannot be seen as formal sources of law, states are not bound to follow resolutions even if they are adopted unanimously, therefore even if they voted in favour of the 1975 resolution, it has no binding effect.

  1. Ethics in practice

    However, the immunity in this particular case was not based on the usual barrister-client premise of the absence of a contract, but on public policy in that: (a) the administration of justice required that a barrister should be able

  2. The right of silence long

    whether the defendant was genuine in accepting the advice but is clearly not decisive in determining that question. The meaning of the distinction between "genuine" adoption of advice and opportunistic use of it to cloak the absence of an innocent account was aptly stated by Kay L.J.

  1. Discuss the origins of international law by examining a number of theories, which have ...

    He thus conceived of law as the positive creation or result of the will of the sovereign. He also reasoned that "strictly speaking, every law properly so called is a positive law" (Clarke 2003:10). Thus, Austin's attitude towards international law was colored by his theory of law in general.

  2. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is one of the six principal organs of ...

    However, in certain circumstances, related matters may be the subject of discussion in other organs of the United Nations.10 It is commonly accepted that the jurisdiction of the Court extends only to legal disputes. Dispute can be defined as 'a disagreement over a point of law or fact, a conflict

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work