• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the operation of Judicial Precedent.B. Identify and explain the advantages and disadvantages of precedent as a system of law making

Extracts from this document...


In this essay I will be looking at the questions below which are: A. Describe the operation of Judicial Precedent. B. Identify and explain the advantages and disadvantages of precedent as a system of law making A. Describe the operation of Judicial Precedent. Answer: The operation of the Doctrine of judicial precedent is where the past decisions of the judges create law for future judges to follow. English precedent is based on the Latin, stare decisis, meaning stand by what has been decided. This system relies on the hierarchy of the courts. Every court is bound to follow any decision made by a court higher in the hierarchy and in general appellate courts are bound to follow their own decisions. At the top of the hierarchy is the European Court of Justice, this court only has jurisdiction over some areas of the law such as European law. ...read more.


Below the Court of Appeal are the divisional courts (Queen's Bench Division, Chancery Division and Family Division). The divisional courts have to follow their own decisions but again there are a few exceptions. Below the divisional courts are the High Court. The High Court has to follow all precedents of the higher courts and it binds the lower courts, it does not have to follow decisions but I generally does so. If the precedent was set by a court or higher status to the court deciding the new case, then the judges in the present case should follow the rule of law established in the earlier case. - But if the precedent is from a lower court in that hierarchy, the judge in the new case may not follow but will certainly consider it. ...read more.


The later court may confuse to follow the previous decisions. b) Fixity - if the previous court has an unjust decision, later court must follow so there's unjustices. c) Unconstitutionality - claims that judges do not make law, they only state the law. d) Arguments over whether the previous case even represents the new one can arise. The judge must decide on what happens in cases like these, as both parties (or even their lawyers) will not find common ground between which previous ruling represents the case as a whole. e) On the matter of previous ruling, there is a variety of cases that could apply. Some cases are even still in the progression stage therefore its rulings cannot be used until after the case is over. The judge has many cases to choose from to refer to and this could take a while - prolonging the court hearing and even resulting in witnesses to forget the event ?? ?? ?? ?? Dominique Howe Judicial Precedent 26th Jan 05 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Explain how the doctrine of precedents operates through the hierarchy of courts within the ...

    The power to overrule the decisions of lower Courts is used sparingly in order to maintain the respect and authority of the lower Courts. (Elliot & Quinn, (2009) English Legal System, 10th Edition, Pearson and Longman: pg 20 When reversing a precedent, the case in which the precedent concerns would have been appealed to a higher court i.e.

  2. Does the law of nullity continue to have any valuable role to play in ...

    Another possible argument in favour of abolishing divorce would be that in fundamental respects the effect of a decree of nullity is almost identical with that of a decree of divorce. In 'The Law Commissions Working Paper No. 38' the law commission said: 'The essential effects of an English nullity

  1. There are many advantages and disadvantages to law making in parliament; however the advantages ...

    will be reviewed in the original house the bill started, the next stage is the third reading is the last vote and is more a matter of form, it is improbable the bill will fail at this late stage, the bill is passed across to the next house to repeat

  2. Sources of Law - Judicial precedent.

    Does the obiter dicta widen the ratio or give an alternative situation - Alternative, had there been no disclaimer then there would be a duty of care owed. Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees Housing Ltd (1947) - Contract Facts: By a lease under seal made on September

  1. Discuss the operation of the doctrine of precedent in the Australian courts

    With reference to Blomley vs. Ryan, the vendor, Blomley was heavily drunk at the time of making the sale of grazing property to Ryan. In the common law, this transaction would be void. But the equity looked at the matter having regard to all circumstances.

  2. To what extent do the doctrines of precedent curb judicial creativity?

    Of course, it doesn't necessarily have to follow its previous decisions according to a practice statement released in 1966, issued by the LC. Which basically stated the House Of Lords 'would treat its decisions as normally binding unity it would depart from these when it appeared right to do so'.

  1. Law Making - Judicial Precedent.

    The ratio and the obiter are decided later by fellow judges, Barristers, Solicitors, legal academics, and students of law. Persuasive Judicial Precedent Where no binding precedent exists but a judge needs to reach a decision. E.g. a new piece of legislation being tested for the first time.

  2. The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent.

    In the earlier case the claim did not succeed as their was no intention to create legal relations however in the second case the couple were separated and the agreement was in writing and was meant as an enforceable contract, differing from the earlier case.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work