• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do we agree with Lord Diplock's view that the British Constitution is firmly based on the separation of powers?

Extracts from this document...


"It cannot be too strongly emphasised that the British Constitution, though largely unwritten, is firmly based on the separation of powers" Duport Steels v Sirs [1980] 1 WLR 142, per Lord Diplock The question here is, do we agree with Lord Diplock's view that the British Constitution is firmly based on the separation of powers? In addressing Lord Diplock's view, the first point to consider is the meaning of the doctrine, 'the separation of powers' and its origin then consider whether or not there's a separation of powers in the British constitution in which the overlaps between the legislative, executive and judiciary arms of the British constitution will be examined. The doctrine of separation of powers has emerged in several forms at different periods and in different contexts and is traceable back to Aristotle; it was developed by Locke; its best known formulation, by the French political philosopher Montesquieu, was based on an analysis of the English constitution of the early eighteenth century. The doctrine, formulated by Montesquieu in L'Espirit des Lois briefly stated the following. * There are three main classes of governmental functions: the legislative, the executive and the judicial. * There are (or should be) three main organs of government in a State: the Legislature the Executive and the Judiciary. * To concentrate more than on class of function in any one person or organ of government is a threat to individual liberty. For example, the executive should not be allowed to make laws or adjudicate on alleged breaches of the law; it should be confined to the executive functions of making and applying policy and general administration.1 In other words, the doctrine of separation of powers believes that each of ...read more.


[1994, p 18]9 However, this overlaps will no longer exist, as the judicial function of the Lord Chancellor is to be abolished and replaced by a Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs which means he will not fulfil the judicial function or role of the Speaker of the House of Lords. There is already a temporary exercise where the office of Lord Chancellor gained a temporary reprieve and Lord Falconer of Thornton was appointed as the new Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs.10 The doctrine of separation of powers provides that the judiciary should not have law making power. However, judges in a sense do have a law making power as they can develop common law. The 'declaratory' theory of precedent - the theory that judges do not make law, but only declare the common law or common customs of the realm - persisted, into the 19th century, but is more generally recognised that the judges in the UK do exercise some law making function, with the intent acquiescence of Parliament.11 A striking example of this creative function was the House of Lords decision in Burmah Oil v Lord Advocate12where the House of Lords held that the oil company had a common law right to be compensated for the destruction of the installation by British forces which were acting under prerogative.13This case illustrates how the courts may develop common law in order to take account of new situations. Equally, however, the courts have been prepared to rely on the doctrine of the separation of powers to justify a refusal to create new rights. Hence in Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner14. ...read more.


PLEASE, E-MAIL ME WITH YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS AND CRITICISMS, IF ANY. I HOPE I'M NOT TAKING TOO MUCH OF YOUR TIME BECAUSE I CAN'T THANK YOU ENOUGH FOR THE PART YOU'VE PLAYED IN HELPING ME (A TERRIBLY CONFUSED AND SCARED 1ST YEAR STUDENT!) WORD COUNT: 2,605 WORDS. 1 Brazier, R. (1998) Constitutional and Administrative law. London: Penguin 2 Vile, MJC. (1967) Constitutionalism and the Separation of powers. Oxford: Clarendon 3 For the eighteenth century, Holdsworth finds Montesquieu's analysis inadequate and misleading: History of English Law, Vol. X. pp.713-724 4 Parpworth, N CONST AND AD pp199-200 5 Parpworth, N p45 6 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union [1995] 2 WLR 1 7 Bagehot (1993) The English Constitution, pp 67-68 8 Stafford v United Kingdom [2002] NLJR 880 9 Barnett, H (2002) Constitutional and administrative law. London: Cavendish, p 111 10 www.telegraph.co.uk 'Reform blocked by 1,400 years of tradition' by Joshua Rosenburg and George Jones (14/06/2003) 11 Molan, M, T (1999) Constitutional law: The Machinery of Government. London: Old Bailey Press 12 Burmah oil v Lord Advocate [1965] AC 75 13 Parpworth, N (2002) Constitutional and Administrative law. London: Butterworths, p 240 14 Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1979] Chapter 344 15 Entick v Carrington [1765] All ER Rep 41 16 See 13. 17 M v Home Office [1992] 2 WLR 73 18 See 13. p 25 19 Definition of Judicial independence by former Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern Barnett, H Constitutional and administrative law (2002) London: Cavendish. 20 Bill of Rights 1689, Article 9. 21 R v Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, ex p Al Fayed [1998] 1 All ER 93 22 [1964] 2 All ER 348 ?? ?? Abisola Oshinusi Constitutional and Administrative law essay 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. The rule of law and a separation of powers are constitutional principles, which seek ...

    We have in this country what might be described as a weak separation of powers, in that the executive and the legislature are fused, but the judiciary is independent of both Parliament and the executive. However the office of Lord Chancellor links them.

  2. Examine the implications of the doctrine of the separation of powers and the concept ...

    The Lord Chancellor not only has the power to see that judges are appointed by referring them to the Prime Minster but can also influence whether they go further up the hierarchy. No current or past strict separation of powers has ever existed in the English constitution assigning constitutional laws

  1. Confidence and privacy torts

    providing guarantees against the activities of the government or other public bodies. But the European Court has developed an idea that in some respects the Convention puts a 'positive obligation' on the member states to make provision in their laws for other rights as against the government or as against

  2. The 1999 Immigration and Asylum Seekers Act

    Labour in opposition believed the party could implement more effective migration policy than the Conservatives when in reality the 1999

  1. Lease or Licence

    how is this to be differentiated from a contractual licensee, who essentially has the same limited rights? What about freedom to contract and privity of contract?

  2. Discuss Dicey's three propositions on the concept of the Rule of Law in the ...

    Official Secrets Act or the activities of Britain's secret services (though they may not know if they are being investigated or not!) It is agreed with some justification that a modern society needs bodies like MI5 and MI6 simply because there are a tiny number of individuals who wish to subvert society and have to be dealt with accordingly.

  1. Constitutional law - In this county, our constitution does not embody a full separation ...

    Some constitutions believe that the powers of the legislature, executive and judiciary should be put into effect by different people or groups. The point of this is to make sure that power does not fall into the hands of a single group or person.

  2. In a modern state the separation of powers must be based on the rule ...

    As Dicey noted: "no man is above the law; every man and woman, whatever be his or her rank or condition, is subject to the ordinary law of the realm and amenable to the jurisdiction of the ordinary tribunals..." No one is above the law, which is, after all, the creation of the people, not something imposed upon them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work