• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

English Law has so far failed to reconcile the demands of the emerging European human rights jurisprudence with its instinctive tendency to create 'public interest immunities' in respect of the negligence liability of public bodies.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"English Law has so far failed to reconcile the demands of the emerging European human rights jurisprudence with its instinctive tendency to create 'public interest immunities' in respect of the negligence liability of public bodies. Reform of the law is needed." Introduction The aims of this essay are to critically discuss the statement, "English Law has so far failed to reconcile the demands of the emerging European human rights jurisprudence with its instinctive tendency to create 'public interest immunities' in respect of the negligence liability of public bodies. Reform of the law is needed." From this I will establish reasoned arguments as to whether or not I agree or disagree with the statement, illustrating my answer by reference to case law and statutory provisions. What is the relevant law? Relevant laws for the argument is contained within Human Rights Acts 1998, section 6, Acts of public authorities, which I extracted from Common Law (Law 103/220) 2002 - 2003 Statutory Materials Handbook. Which states: (1) It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with a convention right. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an act if - (a) as the result of one or more provisions of primary legislation, the authority could not have acted differently; or (b) ...read more.

Middle

And so I believe a way around this problem would be to privatise the public services, so that if any citizens would like to take the services to court then the immunity would not apply, and so a fair and impartial hearing would be able to take place, meaning justice will be done. Where immunity has been exercised by the courts In the case of Osman v Ferguson4 the courts dismissed the applicants claim that the Police had negligently failed to arrest Paget-Lewis, who was Ahmet Osman's former schoolteacher. The Police had failed to arrest Paget-Lewis on any charge after interviewing him on the basis of complaints made to them from the Osman family. Tragically for the Osman's, Paget-Lewis went on to conduct the threats he had made, and on the 7th of March, Paget-Lewis seriously injured Ahmet Osman, and killing his father. And so the courts found that this case satisfied the proximity requirements that were needed to show that the Police did infact owe the Osman's a duty of care as their relationship was sufficiently proximate. However the case was a failure, as the English court applied the immunity from Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire. ...read more.

Conclusion

Who would it benefit more? Would the public / Police be getting a better deal? And would changing any of the above mean that Police officers could not do their job properly because they are unable to work to serve the public to the best of their ability because they are too busy thinking if their actions will attract a court case. Concluding statement Furthermore on concluding this argument I believe that for the reasons set out in my arguments in the above section, "What are the problems with the law?" There can be no straight answer as to whether or not the Police or any other public service for that matter should be entitled to immunity from the courts. As there will always be tests that have to be satisfied before the courts, that go on to prove some matter of fact. And then each case is individual in its own right, and so has to be examined and judged upon its own merit. Having said that I do believe that the Police and other services should be able to do their job to the best of their ability without having to worry about the public taking them to court. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Sources of English law.

    Economic interpretations Marx: Law and state are repressive instruments of the class domination. In the transition to Communism , which has no need of coercion because is the government of the people, they will wither away. Max Weber: Factors in particular civilizations are taken into account, including the existence of accepted systems of values.

  2. Confidence and privacy torts

    if newspapers do not publish information which the public are interested in, there will be fewer newspapers published, which will not be in the public interest" (see Appendix 2) A person who takes a photograph of another person in a hospital bed, without his knowledge, is not under an 'obligation of confidence' to the person whose photograph he has taken.

  1. Critically analyse the extent to which the right to respect for a private life ...

    which occurs when a person's chromosomal sex is used directly or expressly to limit their choices, opportunities or benefits48. Such discrimination is most often used to enforce the socially traditional sex roles, channelling chromosomal men into one role and chromosomal women into another49.

  2. Describe the Composition and Role of the European Court of Justice and Evaluate the ...

    Finally the Advocate-General's opinion is read out. The judges retire to consider the verdict after oral proceedings have concluded. This is done in concealment as no one is to know the language they deliberate in. (It is common knowledge that French is used throughout). Judgement is a highly formal affair and must follow particulars of Article 63 of the Rules of Procedure.

  1. The European Court of Human Rights was set up in 1959 as part of ...

    human rights disputes is X, Y and Z v the United Kingdom (1999)3. This case was referred by the Commission, to the Chamber, within the three month period laid down by Articles 23 and 47 of the Convention. The reason for the request was to decide whether the facts of

  2. The right to freedom of expression is probably the most universally accepted human right.(2) ...

    It stressed the media's crucial role in reporting matters of public interest. Freedom of the press provided the public with "one of the best means of discovering and forming an opinion of the ideas and attitudes of political leaders"(16). The Court stated: "More generally, freedom of political debate is at

  1. Charitable trusts are public trusts that confer a benefit to the community.

    The committee expressed that they were satisfied with the meaning and believed that no problems concerning fiscal privileges should arise when deciding whether a trust is a valid. However they recommended that a new statutory definition should be enacted based on Lord MacNaughten's classification; a recommendation which has not been implemented.

  2. Lon Fuller - professor of Jurisprudence at Harvard.

    Failure to do so constitutes plagiarism. When you paraphrase someone else's words or use an idea or interpretation that is not your own, you must also identify the source. Of course, turning in someone else's work as your own, or turning in a paper for which you have already received credit in another class, is prohibited.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work