• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Rent Restructuring

Extracts from this document...


RENT RESTRUCTURING The rent restructuring (RR) debate was triggered by the publication of the 2000 Green paper 'Quality and Choice: A decent home for all'. The following paper is a response to the numerous policy developments and subsequent implications that have resulted from this document. The paper will be presented in two parts. Firstly one is concerned to deal with the policy and the decisions that have been taken by the Labour Government over that last few years. Here I will comment on rationale that lay behind the decision to abolish the old system of rents. Also I will attempt to uncover why the Government is so keen to seek convergence of rent levels between the two social housing sectors. In the second part of this paper I am more concerned to identify the real life implications of the shift in direction of the policy. Below I will discuss what the policy shift actually means to those organisations and self interest groups affected by it. Particular attention shall be paid to the implications arising from the policy which affect social landlords. Due regard shall be paid here because some landlords believe that a question mark hangs over their future viability. Another major point of concern for me in this paper is how tenants of social housing will be affected by the changes that will result from rent reform. ...read more.


The tenant who accepts less favourable circumstances perhaps a smaller property in less desirable location can expect to pay a cheaper rent. Obviously sandwiched in between such statements in the documents are those reassuring statements about fairness and affordability. Seemingly the Government were anticipating the disquiet that rent reform would create amongst some self interest groups. The text in the policy statement stresses how landlords and tenants will be affected. Landlords are partially reassured as the statement promises flexibility. An attempt to reassure tenants also appears. The housing corporation produced guidance in October 2001 for HA's. This guidance came in the form of a document entitled: 'Rent influencing regime: Implementing the rent restructuring framework'. The guidance offered by the housing corporation stressed that HA's were expected to implement Government reforms. However the document went to some considerable lengths to reassure associations that they have flexibility to fulfil whatever obligations they may have. It was stressed by the Government that social tenants will pay at most no more than inflation plus £2 in any one year. More details on how this was going to work were detailed in the April of 2000. The document contained advice and guidance for landlords on how to use the rent setting formula to calculate correct rent levels. The maths was as follows. Seventy percent of the rent that a landlord could now charge was to be based on the relative earning capacities of individuals in the local area. ...read more.


The Government, however, remains steadfast in its support of the new system. They claim that more not less people will benefit. By striving to close the gap between sector rents "we will offer tenants wider choices and be more equitable" (Mauthe, 2001). It is also the case that under the new scheme tenants will be more educated so that they understand rent pricing systems more and are aware of their rights as housing tenants. The government also points out that that the system implemented was chosen after much consultation and that it was the best option on the table by some way. The 2000 Green paper Quality and choice: A decent home for all was a groundbreaking document. Rent reforms began in April of 20002. It is at this time too early to evaluate how successful or not RR will prove to be. However, concerns exist, particularly amongst landlords and tenants. HA landlords are particularly worried. Many feel that there is too much Government intervention. They are also worried about meeting financial obligations and attracting more investment. Tenants groups are also suspicious of the new reforms. It is obviously very early days but affordability issues are worrying many tenants particularly those in the south. The Government understands the implications of RR. They are far reaching, and the future direction of rent reform must be carefully considered on the basis of the evidence that will be collated by our social landlords over the coming years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Land Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Land Law essays

  1. Co-ownership on Family Home

    Mere 'common intention' is usually insufficient. There must be detrimental reliance on such an intent, as emphasized in many cases, e.g. Chan Pui Chun v Leung Kam Ho17. The mechanism for proprietary estoppel is similar to that of constructive trust.

  2. Registration of land

    in trust, will hold the money received from sale in trust for the equitable owner. Hence, this simplifies the process of conveyancing as the purchaser does not have to worry about communicating with the equitable owners of the land. However, this principle does have it flaws as well, as for

  1. Tenancy case question. The problem faced by Linda is whether or not Terry, Tina ...

    We can see this in Markou v Da Silvaesa5, where it illustrates the fact that attendance or services provided by the landlord even though exclusive possession has been given does not equate to a lodging agreement. This is better emphasised, that "a mere promise by the landowner to provide such

  2. This essay will attempt to critically evaluate some of the legal and policy issues ...

    The main issues that this Act attempts to resolve include that of legal and policy issues. The former regarding the over-saturation of legal attention that these party wall disputes seek; and the latter regarding the lack of directives in the existing legislation in prescribing to the parties the basics in handling party structure matters in England and Wales.

  1. The property legislation of 1925

    In Jones v. Smith, for example a purchaser who had been told that a marriage settlement existed but that it did not affect the property, was not fixed with notice when this proved to be untrue. It was said: "If notice of the existence of a settlement, declared not to affect the husband's

  2. Tenancy Type. Mary owns a residential property in Putney, London. Five months ago ...

    bring the tenancy to an end on one or more of the grounds specified in the grounds specified in Schedule 2 to the Housing Act 1988 (as amended). Some of these grounds are mandatory in which case the Court must make an order for possession i.e.

  1. The 1925 Legislations Aims.

    Things such as Fee Tails, and Life Estates could now only exist as equitable interests. Under the Law of Property Act s 1 only 2 legal estates now exist; "(a) an estate in fee simple absolute in possession (b) A term of years absolute" There were also only 5 types

  2. Land law problem question - access

    and profits à prendre, https://laws.elearning.london.ac.uk/pluginfile.php/39040/mod_resource/content/3/land-subjectguide2013-08.pdf Proprietary Estoppel: http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/2-2-essays/proprietary-estoppel-essay.php Cases Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] AC 56. Antoniades v Villiers [1988] UKHL 8.. Asburn Anstalt v Arnold [1989] CH 1. L & T. Bailey v Stephens (1862) 12 CB (NS)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work