• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Role of Juries. One could argue that the use of juries in trials is a cornerstone of the democratic system and that having a trial by ones peers is a right which dates back to the Magna Carta

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

One could argue that the use of juries in trials is a cornerstone of the democratic system and that having a trial by one's peers is a right which dates back to the Magna Carta 1215.1 However, Zander believes this fact to be incorrect. One could argue that it is fairer than trial by judge alone, since it is predicted that the twelve people of the jury will cancel out each other's prejudices. Juries must decide whether the defendant in a criminal court is found guilty based on the evidence given in the courtroom, and therefore it can be argued the juries have one of the most important roles in the judicial system. Indeed, Lord Denning commented on the power of juries: - "It (trial by jury) has been the bulwark of our liberties too long for any of us to seek to alter it. Whenever a man is on trial for serious crime or when in a civil case a man's honour or integrity is at stake... then trial by jury has no equal." The jury is comprised of twelve members randomly selected from the electoral register who must look at the evidence presented from both sides, listen ...read more.

Middle

This shows how the importance of juries is overrated as, when given the choice, most defendants choose to appear before magistrates.5 From the 19th Century onwards, jury service was restricted for owners of property exceeding a certain value but currently, under the Juries Act 1974, based on the recommendations of the Morris Committee 1965, any UK resident between the ages of 18 and 70 on the electoral register are eligible for jury service. Before the Criminal Justice Act 2003 was introduced, ineligible persons included those whom one would consider to exercise undue influence upon the jury's decision by virtue of their professional knowledge of the justice system, i.e. judges, lawyers, police officers etc.6 However, after act was introduced, the only people that could be excused from jury service were those whom were 'mentally disordered.' This contradicts what was witnessed in the Combined Courts of Newcastle recently, where in R v Bell7, Judge Evans deemed it inappropriate for a Newcastle police-man and a Crime Scene Investigator working in Durham to sit on the jury panel, hence showing that the 'law in the books' is not always the same as 'law in action.' ...read more.

Conclusion

Auld L.J's recommendation of empowering trial judges in more complex fraud cases12 was accepted and included in the Criminal Justice Act 200313, meaning cases that would be unduly burdensome on jurors in terms of complexity and length would be put on trial by judge alone. This replacement followed the costly Maxwell brothers' trial 1995-96. Sir Frederick Lawton once argued that jurors 'level of understanding of cases, and perhaps their level of intelligence, are not always up to the task they have to perform'. The importance of the jury recently has declined due to the introduction of such acts as The Senior Courts Act 1981, which stipulates the right to a jury trial is limited to four specific areas; fraud, defamation, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. The first criminal trial held without a jury occurred in 201014. The introduction of The Criminal Law Act 1977 and the Justice Act 1988 also limited the power of the jury. However, one cannot say the Jury does not play an important role as Lord Birkett once said:- "...the jury introduces into the law an element of community sentiment and fairness: a jury can do justice where a judge ... has to follow the law... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE PROBATIVE VALUE OF ADMISSIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES IN TANZANIA

    The section insists that the fact deposed to as discovered must be relevant to the fact in issue and it must be concealed in the knowledge of the accused55. The court in Pulukuri Kottaya v R56 stated that it is fallacious to treat the fact discovered within the section as

  2. Explain the role of juries in criminal and civil cases

    is random, but certain criteria, exemptions and challenges could be considered to make the trial unfair by having non-random juries.

  1. The right of silence long

    The defence would generally need to explain the reason for the advice. Where the defence offer no reasons behind the legal advice to be silent and the jury have only the bare fact of the advice to go on, it may be impossible for them to decide whether the silence

  2. Lord Devlin famously said, "...trial by jury is more than an instrument of Justice ...

    It is arguable that his conclusions with regard to juries hold 'something for everyone', as it were. He categorically requires that jury trial continues for serious offences, pleasing the pro jury trial camp. He recommends a reduction in jury trials by removing the defendants elective right to such at the

  1. the jury

    Jurors are not law experts and in certain circumstances, the law applied in the cases might just be a level above their understanding. It is therefore more reliable to have a judge to handle them22. Furthermore, some proposed reforms, such as those advocating that jurors be permitted to take notes

  2. The trial judge will have to consider whether, in view of the circumstances in ...

    However, there are arguably other pressing grounds to exclude the confession here under s.76 PACE. Has the confession been obtained by oppression? Once the defence raises the issue and it is accepted by the judge as possibility, the burden is on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that it has not been so obtained.

  1. Who is and who isn't eligible for jury service within the English legal system. ...

    Many able jurors do not understand the court procedure and find it confusing. It is impossible to find out whether a juror understood the case or not as it is illegal to interview jurors about their decision. The jury's decision is reached in secret, the reasons for the decisions are not known.

  2. Examine in the light of the Maltese Jurisprudence, discuss the role, status and distinct ...

    Save as is otherwise provided by the COCP or by any other law, the mode of procedure before an appellate court is by application. The application shall contain the prayer that the judgment appealed from or any part thereof be reversed or varied.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work