• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Role of Juries. One could argue that the use of juries in trials is a cornerstone of the democratic system and that having a trial by ones peers is a right which dates back to the Magna Carta

Extracts from this document...


One could argue that the use of juries in trials is a cornerstone of the democratic system and that having a trial by one's peers is a right which dates back to the Magna Carta 1215.1 However, Zander believes this fact to be incorrect. One could argue that it is fairer than trial by judge alone, since it is predicted that the twelve people of the jury will cancel out each other's prejudices. Juries must decide whether the defendant in a criminal court is found guilty based on the evidence given in the courtroom, and therefore it can be argued the juries have one of the most important roles in the judicial system. Indeed, Lord Denning commented on the power of juries: - "It (trial by jury) has been the bulwark of our liberties too long for any of us to seek to alter it. Whenever a man is on trial for serious crime or when in a civil case a man's honour or integrity is at stake... then trial by jury has no equal." The jury is comprised of twelve members randomly selected from the electoral register who must look at the evidence presented from both sides, listen ...read more.


This shows how the importance of juries is overrated as, when given the choice, most defendants choose to appear before magistrates.5 From the 19th Century onwards, jury service was restricted for owners of property exceeding a certain value but currently, under the Juries Act 1974, based on the recommendations of the Morris Committee 1965, any UK resident between the ages of 18 and 70 on the electoral register are eligible for jury service. Before the Criminal Justice Act 2003 was introduced, ineligible persons included those whom one would consider to exercise undue influence upon the jury's decision by virtue of their professional knowledge of the justice system, i.e. judges, lawyers, police officers etc.6 However, after act was introduced, the only people that could be excused from jury service were those whom were 'mentally disordered.' This contradicts what was witnessed in the Combined Courts of Newcastle recently, where in R v Bell7, Judge Evans deemed it inappropriate for a Newcastle police-man and a Crime Scene Investigator working in Durham to sit on the jury panel, hence showing that the 'law in the books' is not always the same as 'law in action.' ...read more.


Auld L.J's recommendation of empowering trial judges in more complex fraud cases12 was accepted and included in the Criminal Justice Act 200313, meaning cases that would be unduly burdensome on jurors in terms of complexity and length would be put on trial by judge alone. This replacement followed the costly Maxwell brothers' trial 1995-96. Sir Frederick Lawton once argued that jurors 'level of understanding of cases, and perhaps their level of intelligence, are not always up to the task they have to perform'. The importance of the jury recently has declined due to the introduction of such acts as The Senior Courts Act 1981, which stipulates the right to a jury trial is limited to four specific areas; fraud, defamation, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. The first criminal trial held without a jury occurred in 201014. The introduction of The Criminal Law Act 1977 and the Justice Act 1988 also limited the power of the jury. However, one cannot say the Jury does not play an important role as Lord Birkett once said:- "...the jury introduces into the law an element of community sentiment and fairness: a jury can do justice where a judge ... has to follow the law... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Lord Devlin famously said, "...trial by jury is more than an instrument of Justice ...

    He cites instead the Survey part of the Crown Court Study carried out for the Runciman Commission in 1992. Over eight thousand jurors were questioned immediately following the trial they were involved in. Seventy four percent found the experience very interesting and only four percent were negative about it.


    The prisoner confessed that he was involved in a drug racket. It was held that "though the interrogation was done in a barbaric way, yet the confession was admissible as evidence. Statements leading to discovery need not amount to confession provided that the facts discovered and statements made must be in relation to the crime and the accused person.

  1. Explain the role of juries in criminal and civil cases

    Anyone who has done jury service within 2 years can refuse if called up again. Any person summoned may also be excused if he or she can persuade the court officer that there is good reason to do so. Otherwise it is a legal obligation to attend jury service, but

  2. Examine in the light of the Maltese Jurisprudence, discuss the role, status and distinct ...

    and the hour appointed,13 in order to show cause why the claim contained in the writ of summons should not be allowed. Form and contents of the writ of summons The writ of summons is to be made in writing (presumably this is why it is called a writ)

  1. Who is and who isn't eligible for jury service within the English legal system. ...

    Many able jurors do not understand the court procedure and find it confusing. It is impossible to find out whether a juror understood the case or not as it is illegal to interview jurors about their decision. The jury's decision is reached in secret, the reasons for the decisions are not known.

  2. The trial judge will have to consider whether, in view of the circumstances in ...

    of PACE would arise. The fact that Charles did not want to see a solicitor would not make any difference. In any case, a wrongly authorised delay in obtaining legal advice does not render the confession automatically excluded under either s.76 or s.78 PACE.

  1. The right of silence long

    34 CJPOA 1994. The difficulty this created for the accuser's lawyer was recognised in Argent,6 but he CA stated that whilst the legal advice given is a circumstance to be considered by the jury, it cannot preclude consideration by the jury of the issue which Parliament has left to the

  2. 'Critically evaluate the role of the jury in defamation actions. Is it time to ...

    In 'Goldsmith V Pressdram'3, the COA held that a trial by jury would be inappropriate due to the requirement of frequent references to complex documents and relevant legislation, ''having regard to its undoubted complexity (the case) and the difficulties which a jury will have in following the detail of evidence,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work