• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Role of Juries. One could argue that the use of juries in trials is a cornerstone of the democratic system and that having a trial by ones peers is a right which dates back to the Magna Carta

Extracts from this document...


One could argue that the use of juries in trials is a cornerstone of the democratic system and that having a trial by one's peers is a right which dates back to the Magna Carta 1215.1 However, Zander believes this fact to be incorrect. One could argue that it is fairer than trial by judge alone, since it is predicted that the twelve people of the jury will cancel out each other's prejudices. Juries must decide whether the defendant in a criminal court is found guilty based on the evidence given in the courtroom, and therefore it can be argued the juries have one of the most important roles in the judicial system. Indeed, Lord Denning commented on the power of juries: - "It (trial by jury) has been the bulwark of our liberties too long for any of us to seek to alter it. Whenever a man is on trial for serious crime or when in a civil case a man's honour or integrity is at stake... then trial by jury has no equal." The jury is comprised of twelve members randomly selected from the electoral register who must look at the evidence presented from both sides, listen ...read more.


This shows how the importance of juries is overrated as, when given the choice, most defendants choose to appear before magistrates.5 From the 19th Century onwards, jury service was restricted for owners of property exceeding a certain value but currently, under the Juries Act 1974, based on the recommendations of the Morris Committee 1965, any UK resident between the ages of 18 and 70 on the electoral register are eligible for jury service. Before the Criminal Justice Act 2003 was introduced, ineligible persons included those whom one would consider to exercise undue influence upon the jury's decision by virtue of their professional knowledge of the justice system, i.e. judges, lawyers, police officers etc.6 However, after act was introduced, the only people that could be excused from jury service were those whom were 'mentally disordered.' This contradicts what was witnessed in the Combined Courts of Newcastle recently, where in R v Bell7, Judge Evans deemed it inappropriate for a Newcastle police-man and a Crime Scene Investigator working in Durham to sit on the jury panel, hence showing that the 'law in the books' is not always the same as 'law in action.' ...read more.


Auld L.J's recommendation of empowering trial judges in more complex fraud cases12 was accepted and included in the Criminal Justice Act 200313, meaning cases that would be unduly burdensome on jurors in terms of complexity and length would be put on trial by judge alone. This replacement followed the costly Maxwell brothers' trial 1995-96. Sir Frederick Lawton once argued that jurors 'level of understanding of cases, and perhaps their level of intelligence, are not always up to the task they have to perform'. The importance of the jury recently has declined due to the introduction of such acts as The Senior Courts Act 1981, which stipulates the right to a jury trial is limited to four specific areas; fraud, defamation, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. The first criminal trial held without a jury occurred in 201014. The introduction of The Criminal Law Act 1977 and the Justice Act 1988 also limited the power of the jury. However, one cannot say the Jury does not play an important role as Lord Birkett once said:- "...the jury introduces into the law an element of community sentiment and fairness: a jury can do justice where a judge ... has to follow the law... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree English Legal System section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree English Legal System essays

  1. Lord Devlin famously said, "...trial by jury is more than an instrument of Justice ...

    With regard to the representative nature of the jury, it was found that the ethnic make up of the juries mirrored that of the general population. Similarly, the occupational make up of the juries largely mirrored that of the general population.

  2. Explain the role of juries in criminal and civil cases

    Anyone who has done jury service within 2 years can refuse if called up again. Any person summoned may also be excused if he or she can persuade the court officer that there is good reason to do so. Otherwise it is a legal obligation to attend jury service, but

  1. The trial judge will have to consider whether, in view of the circumstances in ...

    special need for caution before convicting Charles in reliance on the confession Lamont18. The admissibility of Bill's confession will be discussed now. What has happened is that, without a caution, Nolan has confronted Bill with a part of Charles's confession in such circumstances as to invite comment on it.

  2. the jury

    and to submit questions for witnesses during the trial, are modest designed changes to assist jurors in reaching well-considered judgments, to improve the comfort of the conscripted citizens who serve as jurors, and generally to optimize jury performance and juror satisfaction.

  1. In this assignment, we must assess the admissibility of various aspects of evidence in ...

    We must therefore establish whether these previous convictions are admissible as evidence. 'In general, evidence that a party or witness has been convicted of a criminal offence on some previous occasion is inadmissible in both civil and criminal cases as part of the opposing party's own case, unless it is

  2. Who is and who isn't eligible for jury service within the English legal system. ...

    Lord Denning argued that some jurors are not up to the task and commented on the 1988 incident where jurors were intimidated in Leeds Crown Court; "You may get girls or lads of 18 serving on a jury who may be an easy prey to bribery or intimidation".

  1. Development of Jury

    fact, and that matters of law are the province of the judge. It may be the ideal case, but most of the time, the verdict decided is based on a consideration of a mixture of facts and law. In fact, the role of early jury is different from that nowadays.

  2. Examine in the light of the Maltese Jurisprudence, discuss the role, status and distinct ...

    If there is no service (and there has not been an exemption in terms of the proviso to section 152(1)) the registrar must within 10 days inform in writing the advocate of such party that the notice has not been served.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work